User talk:HereToHelp/Archive 6

iPodNova

HereToHelp

I acually dont get it, I started the Ipodnova page, placed some references, & I know Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. So why do you want to delete it?--Szayat 09:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

To me, it looked like it was not very well written and somewhat biased. The second and fourth sentences seem more defensive then factual; as does the thing about it not logging IP addresses. The rest looks like a big effort to get people to join to VIP service. In a word: adcruft. It looked to me, frankly, that the article could never overcome that limitation; but instead, how about you rewrite it?--HereToHelp 12:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Single Wiki-Wide disambiguation

Hi. I noticed that you removed my bulletin board posting about a proposition to create a Wiki-wide single disambiguation scheme. True that the discussion on the page I pointed to is not "major" - but elsewhere, namely on the Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements), debate (over the "City, State" convention and the comma disambiguation in general) has been raging since three years. The problem with this debate is that it has involved the same players, a majority of which seem to be from the US (I would like to say "and other countries where the comma practice is common", but this doesn't seem to be the case) - the goal of posting to the signpost post was to widen the debate to contributors from other countries. People don't come to Wikipedia to read only about their own country, after all - and the objective input would be very helpful to this deadlocked discussion.

The proposition to create a convention around a single, universally recognisable disambiguation scheme is a serious one, and one, I think, in the interests of the international media that is Wiki.

Best,

THEPROMENADER 10:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

And if really is a raging discussion, go ahead. But from what I saw—and I could be wrong—it looked like just a new heading with one post (yours) with no long debate about the topic.--HereToHelp 12:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind your input here - have a look at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements) (and all the archives) and let me know what you think - perhaps the page linked to or proposition context could be changed. THEPROMENADER 13:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

That, you're welcome to put up. I frankly have no intrest in getting involved in what appears to be a very complicated discussion, but someone else might.--HereToHelp 13:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry - I wasn't asking you to get involved, just wanted to hear whether you thought the subject suitable for the Pump. Thanks for that. Cheers! THEPROMENADER 15:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Freshmen magazine

You deleted the Freshmen (magazine) article on 23 November 2006 with the notation "(prod, notability)". I somehow missed the prod altogether (no one follow the procedure of notifying editors of articles about prods; I'm guilty of not doing it, either). Since this is one of the top two or three gay porn magazines in existence, I have to believe that the article was deficient. Is there a way for you to restore it long enough for me to do some work on improving it? I don't know how this process is supposed to work. Thanks.—Chidom ^talk  05:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay...on the condition that you really do improve it, while keeping it away from sounding like an advertisement, mind NPOV, etc.--HereToHelp 13:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

That's odd...it doesn't seem to let me restore it, but I can view the text. Here's the article without the prod notice:

'''''Freshmen''''' is an [[North America|American]] erotic magazine. Its target audience consists of [[homosexuality|homosexuals]] and [[bisexuality|bisexuals]]. The magazine contains [[Nudity|nude]] male photography, erotic fiction, video reviews and other adult features. ==External links== *[http://www.freshmen.com/ Official website] {{mag-stub}} {{LGBTQ-stub}} [[Category:LGBT pornographic magazines]] [[Category:American magazines]] [[Category:LGBT media in the United States]]

Wow. No wonder it got canned. As for advertising, etc., take a look at Falcon Entertainment and Mark Dalton (porn star), both of which I worked on extensively. I know how to cite sources, etc., so if I can't find any, there won't be an article. Thanks for your help.—Chidom ^talk  23:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Main Page Vandalism

Actually, it was a template on the Main Page that was vandalized. See the history of Wikipedia:POTD row/December 24, 2006. The vandal utilized several tools to make the vandalism especially difficult to eliminate. -- tariqabjotu 15:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Ah. People need to protect those things!--HereToHelp 15:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Change to Common.css

Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. --ShakingSpirit^talk on behalf of Kaldari 01:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. Taken care of.--HereToHelp 03:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

List of best selling downloads at iTunes

My article has been deleted yet again and I have a message on my talk page to seek an admins permission before reposting.

So here it is, can I repost or am I wasting my time? Glen.leaf 04:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

On one hand, it was unfair to have it deleted when we were still improving it. On the other hand, if the list really isn't notable, there's nothing that can save it.--HereToHelp 13:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

iPod shuffle image

Is the copyright tag supposed to be this instead?

This image is copyrighted, however the copyright holder [[:User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] allows the image to be freely redistributed, modified, used commercially and for any other purpose, provided that their authorship is attributed.

Sorry I got it wrong. It was the first image I uploaded.--Coolkid602006 16:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

It's okay; we all make mistakes. However, I'm afraid that Apple hasn't allowed for the image to be free distributed. I realize that Apple produces better images, and that the media uses them, but here, we have to use our own photographs. Anything that Apple made or that comes from something Apple made is off limits (for hardware, since we can make our own; we get by with fair use on software screenshots). Yes, I know it bites. But that's the law. And don't be intimidated by the giant "possible copyright violation" template, either. It's just a bunch of policy that we have to go through...ugh...--HereToHelp 18:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

iPod 5.5 gen image

I believe it might be a good idea to keep my image. You can see how the screen is apparently brighter on the outside. Hello32020 19:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Not in the tumbnail! Furthermore, your image is blurry and unfocussed, and the background could be edited out, as well.--HereToHelp 20:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Israel-coa-medium.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 05:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

i didn't really upload it, just a revised version...but it is indeed a seal, so I put that tag in there.--HereToHelp 21:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

6th gen Hype

I re-added the section "6th gen. hype" section to the iPod article. I also included the "apple's patent" of the product. And please remember the word Hype means theory so please be-sure to understand the terms and conditions before removing article.

And also remember, there might not be 100% proof of what the product looks like but there is proof of a new ipod ~cooljuno411

There's no proof at all. Apple hasn't said a word about a new iPod generation. They just updated the fifth one. All of your references are from the same site, and it's a year old! I've seen such speculation before. It's probably a takeoff of Zune's bigger screen. It was rightfully removed, and removed again by another user who shares my views.--HereToHelp 14:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Why the revert on the iTunes article?

I know that you might feel that the iTunes Art Importer is unnotable, but that's exactly its problem - it's not nearly as well known as it should be. I discovered it back in the days of iTunes 5, and it's served me well since AND through iTunes 7. It's far better than the built in Art-Adder with iTunes 7.

I strongly ask of you that my revision be allowed, as I hope more people will use it and that it will encourage the author to write a final version of it (instead of just the beta copy that I've been using for quite a while)

Thanks, ~Zach —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Admiralthrawn 1 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC).

It may have served you well, but that's the problem. Wikipedia does not allow original research; basically, anything you did yourself. If you can find a reliable source not affiliated with you or the company that makes it, go ahead and put it back in. Furthermore, a source proves notability. If nobody else talks about it, why should we?--HereToHelp 04:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I understand...makes sense. I don't suppose that Digg counts as a reliable source? *chuckle* : http://digg.com/software/iTunes_Art_Importer Admiralthrawn 1 04:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Community Portal

Well spotted! I'm the Loganberry in question, so thanks for cleaning that one up. Loganberry (Talk) 03:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Stage Debut

I am not the one who created Stage Debut but I would like to have access to the undeleted version of the page to attempt to add references, screenshots, and notability to the article. I have a magazine with a paragraph or two on it. Leave me a line. TheListUpdater 20:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure. You'll have to find references and assert notability; why is this cancelled game worthy of an article when dozens are cancelled each year?

{{Infobox CVG| title = Stage Debut | image = | caption = | developer = [[Nintendo]] | publisher = [[Nintendo]] | designer = | engine = | released = Cancelled until further notice | genre = [[Educational game|Creativity]] | modes = Unknown | ratings = | platforms = [[Nintendo 64DD]], [[Nintendo GameCube]] | media = | requirements = | input = }} '''Stage Debut''' is an unreleased video game that was originally planned for the [[Nintendo 64DD]], then the [[Nintendo GameCube]]. The game was about taking a picture of the player's face & inserting it in the game. This was done through the use of the GameEye, a peripheral planned for the [[Game Boy Advance]] which was going to be the successor to the [[Game Boy Camera]] for the original [[Game Boy]]. The game featured characters from [[Animal Crossing series|Animal Crossing]] & [[Pikmin]] and others. It is a sequel of sorts of the 64DD's '''[[Mario Artist#Mario Artist: Talent Studio|Talent Maker]]''', which was released only in Japan. There have been no news about the development of the game for a few years now, so it's considered by most to be in [[development hell]] or simply cancelled. There are rumors that a Wii version is planned {{fact}}, though there is little if any evidence to support this. Nintendo Power gave a good amount of coverage on the game in 2003. ==External links== *[http://cube.ign.com/objects/482/482801.html IGN Entry] *[http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/stagedebut/index.html?q=Stage%20Debut GameSpot Entry] {{Nintendo-stub}} [[Category:Nintendo games]] [[Category:Cancelled 64DD games]] [[Category:Cancelled GameCube games]]

That was the last version, minus the prod template and unformatted. It doesn't want to let me undelete it, but I got the code.--HereToHelp 20:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Irony?

From your user page: language errors. (There's no no "U" No, no, huh? Almost seems intentional.-- feb^talk 17:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't remember is that was intentional or not—but I'm keeping it it!--HereToHelp 17:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Fermat's last theorem

You reverted somebody's additon of the term Fermat-Wiles theorem, asking for a source. A simple google search would have shown you many uses of the term, including one in Mathematics magazine. CMummert · talk 01:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Alright. I stand corrected.--HereToHelp 02:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

{{Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/banner}}

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 20:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

POTY voting

I know they are all beautiful but only 5 votes are allowed! - Alvesgaspar 00:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry! I didn't see that. I'll revise my vote.--HereToHelp 03:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

While cruising down a list of administrators

your name pretty much jumped up at me because - you guessed it - I need help. I wish to create a category Category:Buildings with sculpture by Corrado Parducci, but don't know how (luddite). Parducci produced sculpture on about 600 buildings and there are perhaps a dozen in wikipedia now and more on the way. I don't know if you need a few to get it started, but Penobscot Building, Meadow Brook Hall Kirk in the Hills and St. Peter Cathedral, Marquette are some, the last two being what I've been working on tonight. I might try one or two other administrators in case you're in hospital or jail or something. Life is supposed to be interesting. Carptrash 10:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Wait. Did you do that or did I? So fast------------------------------------------------------> Carptrash 10:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, somehow in writing to you I created this category, and somehow you are in it. Please believe that this is NOT some vandel or your ex-Mother-in-law or anyh-thing like that It just happened. And for a bit, you are going to be in that category. Carptrash 10:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

That's a little bug in the category syntax. [[Category:Buildings with sculpture by Corrado Parducci]] will put the page in that category, unless it's in <nowiki></nowiki> tags. Try [[:Category:Buildings with sculpture by Corrado Parducci]] (there's a colon right after the two opening brackets). Add the first tag I showed you to the pages you want to categorize.--HereToHelp 00:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Stage Debut: Ready for Takeoff?

I've been working on it some, but here's a small preview: User:TheListUpdater/Stage_Debut TheListUpdater 23:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Possibly. Try to address the question that it got deleted for: why is this noteable?--HereToHelp 00:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikisurgery

Hello,

I hope you can help me at a very basic level.

I am wanting to upload my first article onto Wikipedia, but all I get is a message that the file I want to upload is empty.

Can I check with you what I should be doing? My email address is below, since I am so new to Wikipedia that I am not sure how to find this page again.

I am a surgeon on the board of Wikisurgery (www.wikisurgery.com). The idea of the article is to alert Wikipedia users of Wikisurgery's existence.

Wikisurgery contains numerous absolutely unique detailed operative scripts. The scripts aim to provide all the expert information that a surgeon uses when operating. This is a completely new approach to training in surgery.

Wikisurgery also contains detailed information leaflets to help patients understand about their operations.

Many thanks in anticipation.

Michael Edwards

North Yorkshire

UK

email michaeledwardsok@aol.com

First: welcome! I'm glad to help you. Second: Wikipedia strives for openness, and email is not used used very often; it is preferable to respond here. (Go ahead, that's what it's for!) Third:please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. If you want to write an encyclopedia article on Wikisurgery, follow this link and create Wikipedia:your first article. Articles are typed in to the editing window, just like how you typed in the above message. The "Upload file" button on the left is used for media (pictures, sounds, animations) in specific file formats. If you want to write an encyclopedia article on what Wikisurgery is, you should read over the Simplified Ruleset first. (A brief understanding of basic Wikipedia policy is sufficient for most cases.) If you want to enhance Wikipedia's articles on specific surgery topics, you can edit those pages (use the search bar to the left) or go to Category:Surgery and List of surgical procedures. You can also add external links (links to non-Wikipedia sites) to the applicable page on Wikisurgery in the "External links" section of the article. If you want to upload Wikisurgery media, you should do it on the Wikimedia Commons. That's what called a sister project, another, separate Wiki associated with Wikipedia. The great thing about the Commons as opposed to Wikipedia is that all sister projects in all languages can use the media, instead of just the English Wikipedia. Media uploaded to the Commons should be of a "free" license: Public domain, GFDL, or certain Creative Commons licenses. Another useful sister project is Wikibooks. This is probably the best place to write articles similar to Wikisurgery: instruction manuals and guides for patients, which do not belong in an encyclopedia. You can use second person and be less formal, too: "make sure your tools are sterilized" instead of "the surgeon must ensure the sterilization of his instruments".

As you can see, there are a number of ways to contribute. I hope that wasn't too confusing.--HereToHelp 22:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello H2H,

Many thanks for your most helpful reply to my email.

I hope I have not jumped the gun, but I have succeeded in uploading two articles on to Wikipedia.

They are "Surgical scripts" and "Pantogen surgical scripts". The articles differ only in the presence of the word Pantogen in the title of the second one.

I should be most grateful if you would check that the procedure has been OK. I should like to delete the second article if you agree.

Best wishes.

--M H EDWARDS 17:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Michael —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M H EDWARDS (talk • contribs) 17:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC).

No problem. In time, these articles will help Wikipedia's coverage of surgery. By the way, you can create links by using a pair of brackets, so [[Surgical scripts]] becomes Surgical scripts.--HereToHelp 22:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Your edit

Hi. Regarding your edit to Mac OS X. Logos are standard on operating system articles. My reproduction of the logo mimics the actual current one to the extent that I don't know why you call it unofficial. According to Mac_OS_history, the finder logo is also the actual logo for Mac OS, and my reproduction is the only one of the most current version of the logo on Wikipedia. I addressed your reasons for removing it. I would appreciate your response, and maybe we'll decide together if it is best for the article or not. Thanks Althepal 02:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Since when is another Wikipedia article a source? Also, this makes two copies of a fair use image, the other being Image:Finder icon.png.--HereToHelp 02:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I see your point. Truth be told, "logo" is part of the "Infobox OS" template. Furthermore, my version of the finder is more up-to-date than the other version. So it looks like what should be done is that Macosxlogo.png should replace Finder_icon.png (also because my version is large enough for Wikipedia uses, but, being fair uses, isn't too big), a delete tag should be put on Finder_icon.png, and Macosxlogo.png should be put back on the OS infobox. What do you think? Althepal 04:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry to butt in. I checked on Apple's site for media guidlines on logo usage. The "smiley face" logo doesn't just represent the Finder, it represents Mac OS X. Older systems have their own versions of the smiley face, back to 7.6. Check out their logo program. MFNickster 04:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think you're right, MFNickster. HereToHelp, I value your opinion. Has it changed with this new information? I hope you now see that logos are standard, that my logo is superior to the current logo on the finder article, and that Macosxlogo.png should be on both articles. What do you say? Althepal 05:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to also butt in, but that isn't the Mac OS X logo. It is the "Mac logo". It represents the computer, not the operating system. That is what the logo program linked above says anyway. If the operating system has a logo, it is probably the big metal X. AlistairMcMillan 05:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The only Mac OS X logo discussed in the above linked article is the "Mac OS X Universal Logo", the blue Yin-Yang logo. AlistairMcMillan 05:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

According to History_of_Mac_OS#Mac_OS_X, this is the Mac OS X logo. By the way, here's a reproduction of the OS Leopard logo.

Image:OSLeopard.png

The only thing is that the "X" is different for every version and is not a "Mac OS X" logo. For example, this X I just made is for Leopard - not OS X. Althepal 06:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Please look at the article that MFNickster linked above. It clearly says "Mac Logo Program", not "Mac OS X Logo Program". And HereToHelp is right, Wikipedia is never to be used as a source. AlistairMcMillan 06:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Admittedly, the "Mac Logo" is probably best considered as the logo of the Mac platform as a whole rather than of the OS or the hardware independently. Did you read Apple's usage guidelines, though? They say "The Mac logo is designed to enable easy identification of software products and hardware peripherals developed specifically to run on Mac OS X and take advantage of its advanced features." Doesn't say anything about the Mac hardware at all. MFNickster 06:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, in other words, "We'll let you stick this on your products so that people know they run on the Macintosh platform." AlistairMcMillan 06:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi AlistairMcMillan. I did look at the page you directed me to. At the bottom with the logo, it does say "Mac logo". However, at the top, with that logo and the universal logo, it says, "Mac OS X Universal Logo Program". And this version of the logo was only introduced with OS X. Althepal 07:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Althepal, the "Mac OS X Universal Logo" is the Yin Yang logo and yes Apple are suggesting that both it and the "Mac Logo" are slapped on the side of packaging, because the "Mac OS X Universal Logo" would be pretty meaningless on its own. That doesn't change the fact that the "Mac Logo" is the "Mac Logo" and not the "Mac OS X Logo". AlistairMcMillan 09:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

It is interesting that you get the Apple logo on boot where you used to see the "Mac OS" splash screen, and the smiley logo when you choose "About Finder." You get the Apple logo when you choose "About this Mac," right above the text reading "Mac OS X." By that indication, the Apple is actually the logo for Mac OS X, huh? :) MFNickster 07:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Note also that in the top left corner of Mac OS X you always have the Apple logo. Also you know the "Powered by Mac OS X" images, they use the Apple logo,[1] while "Made on a Mac" uses the Finder icon.[2] AlistairMcMillan 09:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually if either of you are on a Mac right now, try typing "macosxlogo.gif" into Spotlight. Big blue X. Either way, definitely not the square smiley face. AlistairMcMillan 09:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

But judging by Image:All boxes of apple os x releases.jpg, that i for Cheetah/Puma, not Mac OS X in general. I say that there is enough confusion to just leave the logo out.--HereToHelp 14:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I'd say that there is enough reason to have a logo, and it does seem that the reflective mac face is new to OS X. Therefore, this should be on the OS X article. The X is specific to the subversion and cannot be as the infobox logo. Althepal 18:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Althepal, can you point to a single source that says the face is a logo for Mac OS X? On this issue I'm with HereToHelp. AlistairMcMillan 18:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I already mentioned history of mac os article. That is what I'm basing myself on. But we can all agree that the link to Apple's site indicates that the logo is for either Mac OS or Mac OS X. It is also known that before OS X came about, the logo wasn't reflective. So I can see your point, but it seems that this is indeed specific to, or at least correlated with, OS X. But either way, even if this logo applies to all Mac OS, why wouldn't if fit in the article? Althepal 19:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

For xth time, Wikipedia itself is not a valid source. And we cannot agree that the Apple page says the logo is for either Mac OS or Mac OS X. The logo on the Apple page is for "Mac". Not "Mac OS". Not "Mac OS X". "Mac".

We don't need to have a logo on the Mac OS X article. The article is perfectly fine without a logo. AlistairMcMillan 19:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, fine. Althepal 22:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Protecting Bible Buffet

This page has been constantly vandalized by this IP. Could you put a real semiprotect so only normal users can update it? TheListUpdater 18:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

It seems to have stopped. Next time, there's Wikipedia:Requests for page protection (WP:RFPP) for that sort of thing.--HereToHelp 00:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

iPod nano RED image

The old image is blurry. Look at the borders around the LCD screen, they blur into the body of the nano. Look at the strange halo effect around the top of the nano. My guess is that the old image was originally a much smaller resolution and was then resized up to its current resolution, possibly part of a much larger image showing the whole range of RED products or the whole range of nano colours. That is pretty much why as soon as I noticed the new image posted to the iPod article, I went around and replaced the old image. The new image is cleaner, crisper, and doesn't have strange artifacts from being resized.

Two other things. The old image, although it appears to be turned off, looks like it is sitting on a brightly lit surface exactly like the displays Apple sets up in their stores and their demos. And I'm not sure why you think head on with a neutral background is better for an encyclopedia, I would respectfully disagree, I think the tilted image with the non-neutral background helps at least give a real impression of the shape and at least a vague idea of the size of the nano. AlistairMcMillan 00:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thanks for the explanation.--HereToHelp 02:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back!

I've been kind of inactive of late but hope to get back here more as time permits. And, happy upcoming 1st Adminiversary ;-) --hydnjo talk  13:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!--HereToHelp 13:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Golden Sun problem

I've a problem about the Golden Sun video game. I've tried to complete it but I can't. Now I'll tell you my problem that is in Mercury Lighthouse, when Isaac goes to a room which is blocked and he falls down and comes in the room in which there is a statue of goddess and there is written {{cquote He who honors the heart of goddess shall stand at centre of all like a swan in springling water}} Please help me and if like this there will be any other problem then give me solution and tell me whole about when Isaac talks with Saturos. Edit it in the article of Golden Sun.

Kolima

When Isaac goes to Kolima, you know that everything is changed into tree and there is a bad tree who says Hdroom and he wants Isaac and his friends to be turned into trees but we spin around a blue barrier. When the speech ends then Garet asks: Isaac, you have an idea what to do. Isaac says Yes. When Isaac goes to Kolima Forest, he meets two trees one is female and the other is that enemy. He goes into that tree and is called Tret tree. He captures Breeze that is a Djinn of wind but when he comes out of Kolima Forest, there is no solution of turning the trees into people. Please help me and give answer to my these two problems. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dick Mark (talk • contribs) 15:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

This isn't exactly what Wikipedia is for...but (a) use Ply when standing on the goddess's hands and (b) go to the uppermost level of Tret, fall down through the central hole, fight the boss. Then you'l need to bring him the Hermes water, which involves fighting the boss in the Mercury Lighthouse and using the empty bottle (or whatever it's called) found in Imil.--HereToHelp 23:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

You've failed HereToHelp

I think so I've used Ply when standing at goddess's hands and I've used all the psynergies that we can use in the Mercury Lighthouse and if we use moving pysnergy when we are travelling in the lighthouse there are some blocks which become shining red. If you've any cheat or code please tell me, I'll do my best to go to up of Mercury Lighthouse. You know when we reach up, we find Breeze there. How we can fall in the hole because when I reach up I've found only Breeze. We can use ply to cure the heroes but if you say something then I'll try my best --User:Dick Mark 16:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I haven't failed. Wikipedia is not a discussion for this sort of thing; I volunteered information but made no guarantee it would help you. Go to another site, If you can't figure out that which hole to fall in in the top level, or that the platform lets you walk on water after you've aplyed my hints, don't bug me.--HereToHelp 01:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Problem and Thanks

Please forgive me for whatever I gave you the heading. Because of you, I completed my mission in Mercury Lighthouse and I've saved people of Kolima as you told. I went through the Kolima Bridge to Xian and then to Altin but please tell me, where to go and by which way, I had made the water gone in Altin and there is an enemy at the deepest of the peak of Altin. I've also defeated him. There is treasure chest and something in it. Please tell me if I've to go back to Vault or I've to go to any other place. Please help me. Because of your help and what you said, I've done. Now give me the next instruction as I've asked. Remember that from Moghal Forest, I've come to Xian. Now if you'll forgive me than I'll be very thankfula to you--User:Dick Mark 05:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I can get you past that problem...but it's really your game. It wouldn't be any fun if I told you how it worked. Think what you can do in each dungeon, and if you haven't changed something or gotten something extremely useful, you aren't done with the dungeon. Now play your game and find your own path.--HereToHelp 22:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Killer whale FPC

Hello. A Featured Picture Candidate you commented on, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Killer whale mother and calf, is now in the section for "Older nominations requiring additional input from voters." Contributors have tried to improve it after you commented, and your opinion is welcome as to which, if any, of the available versions deserves promotion. I am sending this message to everyone who participated in the FPC. Thanks! Kla'quot 06:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)