Image Tagging for Image:LondonNautical.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:LondonNautical.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:GordonWilson111.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:GordonWilson111.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Archimedes Plutonium

edit

Hi. Please check talk pages and page history before putting a "speedy delete" tag on a page. Note on Talk:Archimedes Plutonium that there was already discussion and the article went through the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion process with a decisision of keep. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 10:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Belated welcome

edit

It looks like no one has extended you an official Wikipedia welcome yet, so let me take care of that:


Welcome!

Hello, HenvY, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Cheers, -- Infrogmation 10:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Ernst Beaux

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Ernst Beaux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Redfarmer was coorect in tagging it for a speedy; it was only a sentence. It's true Beaux invented Chanel No. 5 based on a Google search, but there is no biographical info on him which I could find. Good catch on what is clearly a notable figure, but without content, it's beter off as a red link or as a redirect. I redirected it to the main article on the perfume. If you can find any biographical info, by all means expand it into an article. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Glad to help. In fact, it's grown quite a bit already. I did, in fact, find some hits under your spelling, but not that many. The red link at the Chanel No. 5 article had the correct spelling. One quick Google search and here we are. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LondonNautical.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 22:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply