User talk:Henrik/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Statistic tool

Hi, I would like to understand how your the statistic tool work : do the ip of a contributor counts? going several times with the same ip counts?

thanks for your work, Fatapatate (talk) 21:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The traffic statistics tool is off for Feb 25

Yes, the traffic statistics tool is off for Feb 23. Why ? Thanks a lot.

IP, February 26th 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.88.219.92 (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I cannot find statistics for Feb 25 on any Wikipedia article - is this tool broken? Ottawahitech (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Userfication request on Speed-deleted article

Could you please userfy the recently deleted article "Jessica and the Silver Eclipse" for me? The article was speed-deleted for "not being notable" (which I disagree with), so I would like to revise it and try to get it posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elah806 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

page view stats

Your page view stats tool - which I find extremely useful - has not been working for the past couple of days. Ipigott (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

YES, I also find them extremely useful. Am even thinking about a donation to cover some of your expenses. But the Lithuanian section has been dead for five days already - since the morning of February 22nd. And now is 9:14, 27 February 2010 (EST) KVZ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.80.95 (talk)

The traffic statistics tool

[1] ;( 188.105.143.27 (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

esoteric healing

Hi Henrik. I have waited for your answer and the removal of the tags since my re-editing and improved article on the subject, along with a lot of references to prove its neutrality... but I haven't had a reply yet. So I've decided to try to contact you directly. Please may I ask you to read the article and remove the tags as they are now irrelevant in the context. Sorry if I am jumping the queue! I look forward to hearing from you. See below for my messages to you. Alanhopking (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I look forward to hearing from you.re the neutrality tag on esoteric healing

I have again worked through this article so that it conforms with wiki's neutrality requirement. Please reassess and consider removing the tag referring to dispute etc, thanks. Alanhopking (talk) 23:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Alanhopking (talk) 23:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I have done some substantial referencing for the page esoteric healing. Is this enough to have the neutrality tag and dispute tab removed? Thanks. Alanhopking (talk) 19:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

stats.grok.se Latest link

When wikipedia links to stats.grok.se/lang/latest it shows stats for 2009-12-xx. Maybe time to update to 2010-02-xx ? ;-) 201002 may be added as a date as well. A modification to "Latest" is to actually use the last 30 ays, rather than the current month. Seems it would be useful to script this instead of manually modify it over nd over? Electron9 (talk) 01:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it definitely would be useful to script it. I think that every month, I have no idea why I haven't gotten around to it yet. :) henrik•talk 07:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

It's usually the trap of keeping everyday activities running. Instead of taking a small break and do stuff that saves time from there on. The thing is to make a conscious to deal with it and put other things away for the day :-) Electron9 (talk) 15:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

simon hatley

Hi

I have been trying to correct the entry for Simon Hatley, which is incorrect in a number of details, but the original entry keeps returning. The point I want to stress is that Hatley did not sail on three known voyages to the South Pacific but only on two. The reference for him sailing with Dampier on the St George is incorrect (this comes from 'Pirates of new Spain' by Peter Gerhard who also states incorrectly that Hatley deserted to the Spaniards, when in fact he was captured). There is no evidence at all for Hatley sailing with Dampier on the St George in the source documents, in particular in the main source: 'A Voyage round the World' by William Funnell.

I suggest that whoever controls this entry refers to the Real Ancient Mariner' by Robert Fowke, just published by Travelbrief Publications of which I am the director. Fowke makes no claim to have discovered the link between Hatley and Coleridge's poem, this was established by Wordsworth, but he has written the first proper account of Hatley's life with original details of his place of origin and travels. It's fascinating stuff and Hatley perhaps deserves a bigger entry anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Greg (talk • contribs) 13:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

• Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed

• News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more

• In the news: Idealizing the Star Spangled Banner, Curious Announcement, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Hello Henrik. I was wondering if there is a guide somewhere to using the Wikipedia article traffic statistics? Please answer on my talk page or give me a {{Talkback}}. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Page View Stats

I really (like many others!) appreciate your page view statistics tool. Is there any way to modify it to show the cumulative total of page views since the article's first appearence? TIA

Macadavy (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Macadavy

I thought about that same thing; nope; the only way is to count each month; also it's not accurate unless you count each REDIRECT to the article. No one ever thinks of that. Daniel Christensen (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Wanted to say I've appreciated it too. -- James26 (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Henrik,

Thank you for providing the statistics tool.

Just wondering, other than top 1000, do you have a page that shows the bottom 1000 pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.176.13 (talk) 05:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I'd wager that if he did those pages would soon become the most-watched pages on WP to stem vandalism. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 05:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

• News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones

• In the news: Pentagon shooter used Wikipedia, soon iPhone OS will too

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Java

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Your excellent traffic statistics tool

Hi Henrik, I used to write for Wikipedia, now I write for Citizendium. I would LOVE to get your excellent traffic statistics tool on Citizendium. Do you have any idea of how to go about this? thomaswrightsulcer@yahoo.com tom sulcer (formerly User:Tomwsulcer on Wikipedia) --68.38.86.208 (talk) 22:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

• News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs

• In the news: Studies on collaboration and student usage, Main Page drives traffic to Time.com

• Dispatches: GA Sweeps end

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The stats are dead

They are. 83.57.61.52 (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Not anymore, I hope. (it was a disk space problem, back when this occured.) henrik•talk 22:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Bugs?

Hello, Henrik.

I am a frequent user of your stats page since I am an editor.

Why are there some days where the stats are not showing at all? That's too bad since your counter is just great.

Gabriel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.232.129.233 (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

The causes differ, but the most common case is that the raw data collection malfunctioned for some reason. That sometimes happens, and is regrettable, but there is very little I can do about it. I've chosen to be conservative and not interpolate any missing data, which means that even a one hour downtime will mean the day will be blank. henrik•talk 22:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Statistics

Hi Henrik, I would find it interesting if there was a choice to select a certain period over serval months. Also, as there is a way to cover a year maybe it would be ok to add this to the menu as a choice. Thank you! -- Simplicius (talk) 10:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

For example, would it be possible, to connect a period of several months to one chart? Simplicius (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Pro tip, if you delete the month from the stats.grok.se URL, it'll show the year. I'm (slowly) working at making something that can show longer periods of time better, but I have no eta yet. Perfectly valid questions. :) henrik•talk 22:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

one of these would be cool on the history web page

http://www.gmodules.com/ig/creator?synd=open&url=http://visitormap.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/visitorMap.xml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.30.162 (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Yep, it would be. But the data is depersonalized, and doesn't reveal any details about where the user might be. henrik•talk 22:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

sockpuppet returns

I believe that Monopolees (talk) is the banned sockpuppet User:Escapeeyes|Escapeeyes]] (talk). (UTC) Purrum (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah, the advantages of being away for a while. Problems are magically resolved when you return. Sorry, hope everything worked out even in my absence. henrik•talk 22:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Statistics site

I know you probably get this a lot, but I just wanted to thank you for your wonderful article statistics site. It has been infinitely helpful in many decisions made by the gnomes, especially at WP:RFD. Anyway, it always made me feel a bit better when someone recognized something I did, so I just wanted to extend my appreciation. Have a wonderful St. Patrick's Day! AP1787 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, it's very much appreciated! It's been surprisingly useful that stats site: I just wanted to find out how many views my own articles were getting in the beginning, but people are finding all sorts of uses for it. :) henrik•talk 22:28, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Where is Henrik

I looked up his contributions, and it he has not been active on Wikipedia since Feb 9, 2010? Ottawahitech (talk) 14:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

OMG WTF BBQ! Away for 3 weeks?! Wikipedians should be banned from having holidays. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 13:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm one of those users who occasionally forget to edit for a while. Doesn't mean anything other than that I've been doing other stuff for a little while. :-) henrik•talk 22:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Great to see you here again. Ottawahitech (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Monthly basis of stats.grok.se ?

Hi Henrik, thank you for making Wikipedia article traffic statistics on stats.grok.se
Please consider making a similar tool showing statistics on a monthly (and/or weekly) basis in addition to the daily basis as now, in order to provide a long-term view easily. Perhaps even on a yearly basis?

Thanks, Thomas —Preceding unsigned comment added by TGCP (talk • contribs) 21:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

my article has been deleted

Hi,

my article has been deleted and i do not disagree, but i would like to receive a copy of it / have it emailed to me. Could you please help me with this. Also i need some guarantee that my article, will then not be republished or copied without my consult due to its academic nature. Can you provide me with such a guarantee? and if not, then please explain how can i regain full author's right to the theme that i published in the article.

Best regards,

Lanelanaiilani--Lanelanaiilani (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

It would help if you had said which article you meant, but I assume you meant Depth of the second dimension? You can access it here User:Lanelanaiilani/Depth of the second dimension. Let me know when you're done, and I can delete it again if you don't want it to be accessible.

As for the rights, the text under every edit box says "you irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL", and thus that license will apply in perpetuity. However, I very much doubt that someone will undelete the text and make it accessible again once you're done copying it and I've deleted it again. henrik•talk 08:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Statistics in Armenian Articles

Dear Henrik, Please reply, if it is possible to join Armenian language Wikipedia to the statistics count - [2]. Best wishes, --Zara-arush (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done (I hope. The language code is hy, right?) henrik•talk 08:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear Henrik, I did not find the name of Armenian in the list of the laguages. Please reply, when it will be seen. And yes, the language code is hy . Thank you in advance (before we see it in operation at our pages)! Best wishes, --Zara-arush (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

It's the third to last entry. henrik•talk 08:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Shnorhakalutyun! --Zara-arush (talk) 13:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

• Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts

• News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page

• In the news: Campaign for video, costs of crowdsourcing, iPhone app, brief headlines

• WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Statistics also for other projects?

Hello Henrik, I love your stats.grok.se for Wikipedia page views, but does this also work for other projects (Wikisource, Wikibooks, Wikiversity etc.)? Kind regards --Ziko (talk) 10:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Help me with my new page?

I wrote an article about my dads rapidly growing company ( website ) on wikipedia. It had zero advertising. It was just about what the company was about, how it formed etc etc.

First, Can you mail me the code of my deleted page Infolona

Second, Can you pin point the errors so i can work on them? Help me out please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanmayajain (talk • contribs) 13:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

I am the originator of the page "John Byng, 5th Viscount Torrington". I wonder whether the box "This article does not contain any references or sources" could be deleted as I think the article is amply provided with references and sources now.Aimsworthy (talk) 09:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

New Topic

Henrik,

Thank you very much for the article page statistics. It was very useful to me this way:

I was reading something about Executive Order and is really amazing that the page had a big spike of visitors and editors when the president makes news, and it reflects how amazing how we as human beings try to stick to a definition, but sometimes that definition seems to change or seems not to have a concrete meaning for everybody.

I mean, even paper dictionaries either show different definitions or they add more definitions trough out time. These explains why do we have judges that interpret the meaning and application of every single definition on legal battles.

It's very interesting for me, that when Bush mandated E-verify really hurt many companies that relied in the available labor (skilled and unskilled).

Tonymynd (talk) 22:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Antonio Garciarivas Electrical Designer

Just wondering if you meant to say Executive Order? Ottawahitech (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Ping

You have mail. :-) Risker (talk) 07:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Missing stats from March 1 to 21

Hello Henrik

In this Article in German Wikipedia and also in the English Edition same Article there are stats missing from March 1 to 21. Why is that? Thanks for your help. --KurtR (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Please forget this issue. Need new glasses. :-) --KurtR (talk) 04:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Missing image

Hi,

I really would like to see this image:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chinese_political_system.jpg

From Wikimedia commons, I think it was deleted by mistake:

1. 12:56, 25 September 2008 Kontoenmin (talk | contribs) uploaded a new version of File:Chinese political system.jpg ‎ ( )
2. 18:50, 24 September 2008 Kontoenmin (talk | contribs) uploaded "File:Chinese political system.jpg" ‎ (

File information

Description	English: Model of the chinse goverment system
Source	Own work by uploader
Date	24.09.08
Author	Kontoenmin
Permission (Reusing this file)	See below.

Sources: http://english.people.com.cn/data/organs/court.html wiki)

Can you help? It would really be helpful

--Ghormax (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

• News and notes: Usability rollout, downtime, admin phishing, Wikimania scholarships and more

• In the news: Overdue correction, Critical Point of View conference, brief headlines

• Sister projects: A handful of happenings

• WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Page stats

Hello my friend

[[3]]

Page stats went from hundreds to 0

Know this is a beta but it was a very useful tool

Just wondered what happen

God bless

Steven1969 (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Parrot of Doom/WP:TFASTATS

Hello Henrik

You're a busy man but do you know of a quick and easy way to determine which TFAs gained page views over 150,000?

Regards, Parrot of Doom 13:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the new feature: Wikipedia article traffic statistics .!.

Thanks for the new feature: Wikipedia article traffic statistics .!. Very useful. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Just thanks for the Stats feature.

Just wanted to let you know that I found the Stats tool a real motivator. I very much doubt if it is possible, given that it is internal to the browser, but it would be even "greater" if one could see how often a given heading is clicked on, on a given page.

What likely is possible however is gathering together all the redirects to a specific heading and the number of times that a link from another page is followed to a specific heading.

Thanks again. Dave3 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Hitting your server

Hi, I'm hitting stats.grok.se from the toolserver ATM. If it's too much traffic, tell me... I hope we get all that set up on the toolserver soon! Cheers, --Magnus Manske (talk) 23:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

What counts?

Sorry but does the statistics also count hits by wikipedia robots? Angry bee (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

John O'Connor Power

There are no page statistics this month for the John O'Connor Power site. I am completing a biography and am keen to watch the growing numbers visiting the site. Thank you for all your work Jane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.77.28.255 (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Traffic Stats Tool does not allow viewing of recent stats

Because the drop down list does not have a selection for the current month, one has to wait until the end of the month to see that months statistics.

Keep up the good work
Dave3 (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Nobel Prize

Hej, jag vet inte vad som är praxis på Wikipedia med språk på talk sidor än men eftersom vi båda kan tala svenska tänkte jag att jag använder det...

Du verkar intresserad av artiklar relaterade till Sverige här så jag tänkte fråga dig om du vill titta igenom en Nobel Prize artiklen som jag har arbetat på i några månader nu. Även om du inte hinner titta igenom jättenoga vore jag glad om du bara kunde titta igenom lite snabbt och se om du hittar några problem? Jag försöker nämligen förbereda den för ännu en FA nominering.

Tack på förhand! Esuzu (talk • contribs) 23:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

• News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos

• In the news: Wikipedia influences drug terminology, brief headlines

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup

• Features and admins: This week in approvals

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Gastropods

Hello, I have found interesting higher traffic statistics: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gastropods#Higher traffic. --Snek01 (talk) 11:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

adding wikimedia.org project to grok.se

Hi Henrik, I have yet another suggestion for expansion of your great grok.se site: it would be neat to be able to track wikimedia.org projects via your site as well. Recently Domas added usability.m, strategy.m, outreach.m and quality.m (other .m projects already existsed). Cheers, Erik Zachte (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Hits per day

Hi Henrik!

Could you add the average number of hits per day per article to the stats result page? I.e., total hits for the month divided by number of days counted. Morn (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, how difficult would be to present aggregate counts? Right now, if a file is linked as File:img.png somewhere and as Image:img.png somewhere else, the stats are apparently presented separately. Morn (talk) 09:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Steve Hillier

Hello Henrik

I noticed that you have deleted the article entitled 'Steve Hillier' so I set about rewriting it in a style suitable for Wikipedia.

I have rewritten the article and included many citations. I will be submitting my work this afternoon and I hope that other contibutors will be able to contribute shortly.

I hope this article meets with your approval

Chico —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicoid (talk • contribs) 11:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Article Traffic Statistics

Hi, Henrik, I pretty much enjoyed [4]. Up to the end of March 2010. Would it be possible for you to update this useful tool? Thanks a lot, Fewskulchor (talk) 16:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC).

http://stats.grok.se/

Great tool! Thank you for this.

Any chance you might be able to add a feature to count all redirects some time in the future? For example, Gogo's Crazy Bones has very few views, but Crazy Bones, which redirects there, has a good number. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Viewing statistics

Hi Henrik

The excellent routine for displaying the viewing stistics has a little problem.

It automatically inserts the underscores between the words in the article title but puts one on the end as well. This means it then cannot find the article.

Regards

Peter Lucas

plucas58

edited::

Zdunko (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Here is a Python script that has some of the funktionallity you want. It use a list of articles, checks the iw-links, and count the size of those articles in all languages. --Boivie (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

I like it a lot. It is encouraging feedback to see that an article I researched and created is being viewed by others. Please keep it running. --NaGromOne (talk) 03:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikistats delay

Hi, do you know the reason why the stats do not show the most recent data, like here for example? Brandmeister[t] 15:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Your stats

Very useful. Thank you Skarlet2 (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

citing http://stats.grok.se/

Henrik,

Do you have a preferred way for me to cite the Wikipedia article traffic statistics page at http://stats.grok.se/?

The reference is for a print article scheduled to appear in the Journal of Forestry. The journal's reference style is

author, year, title, access date, URL

which, from what I know presently, would come out as:

Anonymous, 2010. Wikipedia article traffic statistics. Available online at http://stats.grok.se/; last accessed April 13, 2010.

or maybe

Wikipedia User:Henrik, 2010. Wikipedia article traffic statistics.Available online at http://stats.grok.se/; last accessed April 13, 2010.

thanks!

pradtke (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Stats for the days 10 to 13 of April are missing ....

... again. --Chassain (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations

Just to say congratulations for your page visit statistics. Fascinating and very useful.

Taytaybay (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Great stuff Henrik. I'm doing work on UK politicians -in mid election and your counter is fantastic. The counter works even though my signature yesterday didn't!!
JRPG (talk) 07:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

• Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images

• News and notes: Studying German flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case

• In the news: SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

A question

Hello,Henrik. Nice to meet you. Can you tell me if there is a tool that help me to find the total trafic of an especific article? Thanks for your time.--Juan Quisqueyano 14:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan Quisqueyano (talk • contribs)

To my knowledge there's no way to easily get the information you want. Of course, one way to get that information would be to get the number of total views for each month (e.g., http://stats.grok.se/en/201004/Tree, http://stats.grok.se/en/201003/Tree, etc.) for the 28 or so months between now and 12/2007. The number of total views for each month is given in the first sentence -- e.g. "Tree has been viewed 49870 times in 201004."

A slightly more efficient way to get the available 'total view' information would be to get data for each year -- e.g. (http://stats.grok.se/en/2007/Tree, http://stats.grok.se/en/2008/Tree, http://stats.grok.se/en/2009/Tree, http://stats.grok.se/en/2010/Tree). You'll see that some data for months are missing. To find that month-level information, simply go to the page for that specific month. (And be sure to add the total views for that month to the reported number of total views for that year.) Emw (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Very helpfull. Thanks.--190.166.120.129 (talk) 14:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Mahamuni Buddha Temple

I expected this article to have a large number of viewer hits. But the hits on the day the article appeared on DYK main page are very few and also not specifically indicated. Is there a technical glitch or are the figures shown are correct? Can you kindly clarify? Thank you.--Nvvchar (talk) 11:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

question

j'ai essaye plusieurs fois de savoir juste pour consultation le calendrier des jours feries de tunisie de l'annee 1979,mais malheureusement j'ai pas pu,s.v.p.aider moi a ressoudre ce probleme? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.203.148.70 (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

translation : I tried many times without success to consult the holidays days of Tunisia in 1979. Can you help me ?

P.S. : La question est confuse. Avez-vous un lien vers l'article en question ? - Khayman ^(contact) 13:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

• News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits

• In the news: Study of featured article quality, Facebook's integration of Wikipedia, and more!

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Stats grok

First of all, thanks a lot for this tool.

I want to know if there's a page where I can consult the frequentation of an article of wikisource.fr for the whole year. For now, I can only consult month by month (example : for Cinq leçons sur la psychanalyse, I have access to january 2009 http://stats.grok.se/fr.s/200901/Cinq_le%C3%A7ons_sur_la_psychanalyse, february http://stats.grok.se/fr.s/200902/Cinq_le%C3%A7ons_sur_la_psychanalyse, march http://stats.grok.se/fr.s/200903/Cinq_le%C3%A7ons_sur_la_psychanalyse, etc., but I want to know the frequentation for the whole year 2009). - Khayman ^(contact) 13:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khayman (talk • contribs)

Ok, I find it (http://stats.grok.se/fr.s/2009/Cinq_le%C3%A7ons_sur_la_psychanalyse). Sorry for disturbing. - Khayman ^(contact) 13:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khayman (talk • contribs)

Also want to say thanks for the tool! Johnfravolda (talk) 08:42, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Case sensitivity of http://stats.grok.se

Hi Henrik. I like your tool very much but in our German Wikipedia we have a little problem with it, the case sensitivity. Here some example:

• Primus
• PriMus

May you fix this problem? --Jobu0101 (talk) 06:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your work the Wikipedia article stats. Is it possible to get a list of the top 10,000 (as opposed to the top 1,000 currently available?) most viewed Wikipedia articles? Peter Saundry, NCSE

So did you understand what I mean? --Jobu0101 (talk) 16:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jobu0101. I don't have detailed knowledge of how Henrik is collecting his data, but I imagine that being case insensitive allows Henrik to easily group together results for pages like 'James Watson' and 'James watson'. These cases are much more frequent than the 'Primus'/'PriMus' example. Given that, perhaps the selections Henrik is using should be case sensitive, but case insensitive on the first character after a space. On first thought it seems like that would address your problem. Emw (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

• From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars

• Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders

• News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!

• In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!

• Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

userfy article

Hello = could you userfy the article tagged for deletion, "John 'Ole' Olson" for me? I'd sure appreciate it. Thanks- Glenn Glenngnormanorg (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikistats.it

Henrik,

When view the raw data from Wikistats.it, do you know what each column represents? For example:

en Lil_Wayne 1990 90092061 en Lil_Wayne 1891 89170932

The first represents 2pm on Feb 24, 2010, the second represents 3pm (according to the downloaded file from Wikistats.it). I assumed the first number was "new article views" and the second was "overall article views" but that doesn't seem to be the case. Any thoughts or suggestions?

Thank you,

69.112.170.69 (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I think that the last column are bytes transfered, but I'm not sure. emijrp (talk) 22:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

wikistats raw data files

Hi Henrik, Many thanks for the great statistics page with data between 200712 and now. I assume that you do have all the hourly visitor number log files between those two end dates (except for some missing). I could find these data only between 200910 and now at http://mituzas.lt/wikistats. Colleagues and I would like to use these data for academic research. I'm a physicist in a group working on statistical physics and collective phenomena, this is my webpage. Could I download all hourly log files from you? (I've asked Midom about these files, but I'm not sure he has the time to reply)

Thanks --fij (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

They are uploaded to Internet Archive. From December 2007 to September 2009. --emijrp (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Question about http://stats.grok.se

Dear Henrik,

I have found by Googling the web site http://stats.grok.se/ I work as a researcher and would be very interested in getting the access data statistics (for non-commercial, research purposes). I've seen that some data are already available at http://dammit.lt/wikistats/ but the problem is that those older than Oct. 2009 are not available. would be possible to obtain that raw data?

Regards and thanks

Nordez (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

They are uploaded to Internet Archive. From December 2007 to September 2009. --emijrp (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! I think a lot of people have been looking for that data. Emw (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Nordez (talk) 11:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Hallo Henrik! What I can find is how often an article has been viewed during a special month, like 201004. Is there a possibility to find out how often an article has been viewed from the beginning to now? Thanks, --79.255.118.244 (talk) 19:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

German wikipedia user --Špajdelj

You'd have to add up the years, as that's the highest level data that Henrik carries (I believe). See http://stats.grok.se/en/2010/Tree, http://stats.grok.se/en/2009/Tree and so on. Killiondude (talk) 07:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Tracking Chart (Bar Graphs)

Henrik I'm an EE and a Gardener. What a coincidence. I find your Tracking Charts a part and parcel of Wikipedia. So, I'll hate to see them go. If you had to discontinue them, is there a plan to replace it with something similar ?

By the way, I had joined Wiki last month and I have lot to learn. I'm, for the time being, in the process of uploading high-res images (few thousand) of tropical fruits and flowers that grow in Florida.

Thank you for all your work. Langra (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The Toolserver has a way to access page hits, but its system is a bit different. Currently the only tool that I know of that has been written to access that data is located here. Killiondude (talk) 07:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

• Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia

• News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news

• In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

No audience statiscs

Hello, Iam trying to know this article´s audience of may: http://stats.grok.se/pt/201004/Hist%C3%B3ria_das_mulheres

Tks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.21.128.77 (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

See http://stats.grok.se/pt/201005/Hist%C3%B3ria_das_mulheres. Cheers, Emw (talk) 22:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Traffic stats for categories of pages

Hi Henrik. Thank you very much for your traffic stats tool - it's awesome for allowing one to focus one's work on subjects that are of interest to a great number of people. Is it possible in some way to get the top 20 viewed 'Military of X' or 'Army of X' (X Army) articles? Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't think you can use Henrik's tool for that kind of measurement. The closest thing I can think of is this toolserver tool. Just choose WikiProject Military History (or a subproject therein). Killiondude (talk) 07:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

FAQ page

Hey Henrik, I began an FAQ page for your tool, located currently at User:Killiondude/stats. Could you take a look at some point and correct me if any of the info is wrong? I made it by looking at the questions on your talk page and the last talk archive you have. It's not "done" by any means, I may add more questions later, but I don't want to include misinformation. Killiondude (talk) 08:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and I was also thinking that once the FAQ page is completed, it could maybe be linked in an edit notice that I could create for your talk page. I don't want to overstep any boundaries, however. If you'd rather just have a notice at the top of your talk page or something, that's fine. I think that a lot of these questions on your talk page get repetitive, and an FAQ might be helpful. We could also move the FAQ page to your userspace or perhaps the projectspace once it is proofread by you. Killiondude (talk) 08:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

no stats

hello, please i can´t see audience here... http://stats.grok.se/pt/201004/Hist%C3%B3ria_das_mulheres —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.21.128.77 (talk) 05:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

no stats again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.21.128.77 (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

http://stats.grok.se/

A great tool, but it seems that the current month is not available for the first week of that month when searching stats on a particular article. Well, I see a lot of people (about 500 a month according to http://stats.grok.se/en/201004/User_talk:Henrik) write here about the useful tool but Henrik has not edited since March 26, 2010.

I thought I would post here to see if anybody has a suggestion. Sorry Henrik for posting on your page, but this seems to be where discussion is about the tool. Can anybody write a new one? Is there another one that we can use instead? Does anybody have any thoughts? Please reply on my talk as I don't want to be rude to Henrik.

And Henrik: Love the tool. I use it all the time. Thanks!!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

You can manually change the URL to fit for this month. See http://stats.grok.se/en/201005/User_talk:Henrik. Killiondude (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Ahhhhh. Thank you!! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

article traffic statistics

Your article traffic statistics is a most useful and informative tool. Thank you. Handicapper (talk) 13:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Hello Henrik,

The 'Wikipedia article traffic statistics' is great! I see that Wiki's history pages get quite a lot of reading and are among the top runners in number of views.

For example (cut paste):

Thomas_Jefferson has been viewed 269532 times in 201004. This article ranked 549 in traffic on en.wikipedia.org.

(More than a quarter million views in one month!)

I was wondering how many times a day the view recorder is updated. I just finished making a few minor edits in the 'Thomas Jefferson' page and noticed that that page's viewer record number had not changed in the last hour.

Draft Page

I have been an avid reader of Wiki for more years than I can remember and have recently taken up to editing, mostly in the History and Philatelic pages. I have made major contributions in the 'Pony Express' and 'Postage stamps and postal history of the United States' pages. I am currently drafting a page about US History on US Postage in a sub page in my user space. Would certainly welcome some general input about starting up a page if you have the time. All the best, GwillHickers - GWillHickers (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

The traffic statistics data is updated once per day. From what I can tell, it's updated soon after 0:00 UTC. Emw (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

There definitely should be a FAQ created for the traffic statistics, and an editnotice on his talk page linking to it. Killiondude (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Henrik, The page viewer counter is a really great tool. Thanks for making it. I've been using it to follow the interest in the various political issues of the UK general elections this year. I've noticed weekly viewing patterns and I wondered if you could make some mark or colour to indicate weekends? This would help to quickly analyse the data. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewcgirling (talk • contribs) 07:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Here! Here! Yes, some sort of color coding on the bar-graph would be an added asset, esp for us folks with less than perfect eyesight. Also, instead of the year-month indicator being one long number (for example - 201004 = April of 2010) it would be nice to see April, 2010. In any event, the view counter certainly is nice. (Thanks Henrik!) GWillHickers (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Would it be possible to create a longer time scale until i.e. the end of the year. So it would be not necessary each month to wait till the new month is installed. Regards --Geisler Martin (talk) 11:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

What? If you're looking for aggregate data for the last twelve months for an article, you could try looking at http://emw.ath.cx/wikistats/ but that site is still in testing mode, I believe. Killiondude (talk) 07:08, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. But my problem is not to see back for some month but to have to wait after the start of a new month till Henrik has installed this month in his counter. --Geisler Martin (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Traffic statistics

Hi,

does http://stats.grok.se/en/201005/Special%3ABook also track and count parametrized request like these: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=rendering&return_to=Foobar&collection_id=640a433e9888d859&writer=rl

If so, is there any possibility to separate request with different parameters?

We'd be interested in the following differentiations:

Download as PDF bookcmd=rendering

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=rendering&return_to=Foobar&collection_id=640a433e9888d859&writer=rl

Start book creator page bookcmd=book_creator

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=book_creator&referer=Foobar

Book creator start bookcmd=start_book_creator

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=start_book_creator&referer=Foobar

Book creator stop bookcmd=stop_book_creator

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=stop_book_creator&referer=Special%3ABook

Add Article bookcmd=add_article

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=add_article&arttitle=Foobar&oldid=0

Add category bookcmd=add_category

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=add_category&cattitle=Placeholder+names

Open the suggest page bookcmd=suggest

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&bookcmd=suggest

Manage the book

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Book

Any suggestions are welcome --He!ko (talk) 22:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Understanding the statistics

Dear Henrik,

I've seen the great statistics from you at http://dammit.lt/wikistats/

I cannot find anywhere an explanation of how to read the files. What do the two figures mean at the end of the article name, please? As an example:

en Bill_Clay_(baseball) 1 22858
en Bill_Clement 2 116654
en Bill_Clinton 205 49618879
en Bill_Clinton_Supreme_Court_candidates 5 123652
en Bill_Clinton_judicial_appointment_controversies 1 79142

Thanks for the help,

Dora. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleDora (talk • contribs) 11:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

• I don't know what the last number means. The second-to-last number is the number of views for the page listed on the same row, for the hour indicated in the file name. Emw (talk) 12:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Second number is bytes sent. It is not so useful. Erik Zachte (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Possible Glitch for Elena_Kagan

Your traffics stats for Elena_Kagan show 420,800 views yesterday. While this is possible...I find it a bit unlikely.

Could you comment as to whether this is a bug, or the page indeed got almost 1/2 million views yesterday?Smallman12q (talk) 00:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

The page got 420,800 views on Monday, May 10, which makes sense given her US Supreme Court nomination was announced that day. Note that the traffic tool is updated soon after midnight UTC. At midnight UTC, your local time could be something like 4:00 PM / 16:00. Emw (talk) 02:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

• From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted

• Commons deletions: Porn madness

• Book review: Dan O'Sullivan's Wikipedia: a new community of practice?

• Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide

• News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All

• In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Traffic statistics for years

Hello,

i tryed to get statistics for the whole year 2009 with an url like http://stats.grok.se/de/2009/Unendlichkeitsmaschine. This seems to be ok on the first view, but there is a gap in august. Is this method correct?

How can i get the statistics in ascii-format for further statistic examination?

--LoKiLeCh (talk) 20:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. One way to get page view data for that missing month (August) is to go to the data for that specific month (i.e., http://stats.grok.se/de/200910/Unendlichkeitsmaschine) and add the total views for that month to the total views for 2009.

I'm working on a tool similar to Henrik's which will hopefully address some of the more frequent feature requests people have made here. The tool is available at http://emw.ath.cx/wikistats/. It isn't quite ready for widespread usage, but you may want to check there in the near future. I plan on adding support for multiple projects (e.g. German Wikipedia, French Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, etc.) in the next few days. I also plan on giving users the option to get raw page view data so that they can use it for their own analysis. This raw data will likely be available as a .csv file as well as a sortable HTML table. Emw (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot; that's what i am looking for. Due to the zero-limit the distributions are asymmetric. Perhaps you can add the median and further quantiles in addition to the average and the sigma. ?  ;-) --LoKiLeCh (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll add median and other quantiles in the near future. All of the features mentioned in my previous post are now implemented. If there are other features you think would be useful, please let me know. (Note that my server is unstable, so the tool may be unavailable from time to time.) Emw (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Case sensitivity

Your excellent tool at stats.grok.se seems to suffer from case insensitivity. The viewing statistics for Han solo (a trilobite) are identical to those of Han Solo (a Star Wars character), and this is clearly because the two aren't being differentiated. Is this deliberate? Is there a solution? --Stemonitis (talk) 18:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Article statistics tool

Want to collaborate on a tool to present the data as a longer-term line graph, with the ability to view more history and compare articles (kinda like stock symbol sites)? I could just write a wrapper to collect data from your tool and then do the work, but I figure you're probably more skilled and can build a better mousetrap.  :) //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Blaxthos. I've been working on a tool which does what you describe here: http://emw.ath.cx/wikistats/. One can simultaneously compare all available view page data (i.e. page views per day, 12/2007 - present) for two or three pages at a time (or just graph data for one page). There are a fair amount of other features that allow users to easily drill down into the data -- take a look! If you're interested in collaborating on that tool, or even have suggestions, let me know. At the moment I'm refining zoom and pan features for the traffic data graphs. Emw (talk) 01:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh nice, that's exactly what I was talking about. You've done a really great job so far. I do some of the same sort of thing at my job, and one of the things we do for historical graphs like that is to summarize the "zoomed out" views, and then only display detail when user zooms in. The further out you go, the larger the summarization period. It really helps with smoothing the graphs to a more digestible format -- the hundreds of individual pushpins makes it hard to read sometimes. However, in my application the data is already summarized; you'd have to do some heavy math to have it calculated dynamically. Anyway, if you're interested let me know if you want some help. Cheers! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 04:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Raw dump format

Hello.

Can you please tell me what the tho numbers represent form the raw data of http://dammit.lt/wikistats/ ? like: pagecounts-20100502-020000: en Myopic 10 868411 --What is 10 and 868411 ? en Mydriasis 65 1053251

pagecounts-20100502-030000: en Mydriasis 66 1220031

Thanks, James.

BotJmsSawyer (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

The first number is the number of views, the second is (I think), the number of bytes sent. Mr.Z-man 00:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Mr. Z-man is correct. I have it down in my (rough) FAQ page. Killiondude (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

most readed articles

Hi can you please add feature what lists most readed articles? Not for motnth/ year but for ALL times when data is recorded? I mean feature that you need select country first. thnks --Olliii (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Henrik doesn't currently have a tool for that. But you could use the raw data to add it up yourself, if you would like to. Killiondude (talk) 05:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

• News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum

• In the news: In the news

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

This article ranks ...

Is there a lower threshold on when the rank of an article is calculated and displayed? --He!ko (talk) 22:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

How to learn writers/editors of an article

Hello there. I am unsure how to find out who wrote an article, as i want to reference it in a small theses i have written. Any response will be welcome.

Thanks, Raftaman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.8.77 (talk) 08:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

The tool here sounds like what you're looking for. Emw (talk) 12:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Article traffic statistics disappeared

Henrik, your Article Traffic Statistics seem to have completely disappeared. Not only can Firefox not open the page, but the link on every article history page is gone. What has happened? This tool is invaluable and must not be removed. Thanks, Reywas92^Talk 01:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

I was going to complain about the same thing. The link has been removed, and the URL doesn't work. Blackjays1 (talk) 01:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it doesn't work. What has happened ? Thanks a lot for the explanations.

IP, 21 May 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.4.38.148 (talk) 08:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Now it works but days 19 to 21 are missing ... --Chassain (talk) 22:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Article Traffic Statistics

Dear Henrik, or, to Whom it may concern,

I love the new Article Traffic Statistic feature! Please do not discontinue.

Advedom (talk) 07:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Viewing Counter a Vital Tool

I see I am not the only one who has noticed that the view counter has stopped over the last couple of days. Hope it's just a bug in the works as the tool is a valuable asset to Wiki'. It is one of the ways to determine if one of the many frivolous or redundant pages should be removed or merged with another. GWillHickers (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

http://stats.grok.se broken?

Hello Henrik,

I think your website http://stats.grok.se is AMAZING! However, it has not been recording any data for several days now and I am just wondering if it will continue to record data at some later time or if you are planning on taking it down.

(Psd007 (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2010 (UTC))

Yes, I hope it is restored and that the information is not lost.--71.87.158.41 (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

No updates to page view statistics

The Wikipedia page view statistics have not been updated since the 19th. Something may need restarting or access rights granting.

I like checking the statistics on my favourite pages. Thank you for providing the facility.

Andrew Swallow —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Swallow (talk • contribs) 23:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

The stats are dead

No stats for the last five days. Best regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.145.46.132 (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Out of order

Yes, completely out of order. So strange. Thanks a lot for the explanations...

IP, 24 May 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.4.38.148 (talk) 07:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

edit-counter

the edit-counter does not works since three days, does'nt it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.219.55.64 (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Article Traffic Counter

Henrik, please include me among the editors who highly value your traffic counter. I do hope that it can be up again soon. Doc2234 (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Traffic Counter - Ditto

It's a valuable tool. Nothing has been counted since May 19. Have you been on vacation? Maile66 (talk) 01:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello Henrik?

We're beginning to wonder if you are around and know about the view counter not working as there has been no entry from you on your discussion page for some time now. Hope all is well. GWillHickers (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Henrik has been inactive for quite a while; his most recent edit was on March 26. Disruptions to the service at stats.grok.se are most frequently caused by issues with the underlying data at http://dammit.lt/wikistats/. There was an seemingly small abnormality in that underlying data on March 20, the day the statistics service stopped -- it looks like the gzipped pagecounts file got posted about 6 minutes later than usual. To me, this doesn't explain why data for May 21-24 is missing. Usually issues in the underlying data only affect statistics for one day, and the statistics recover the next day.

There was another problem on March 20: grok.se (the parent domain of stats.grok.se) was offline for most of the day (and into the 21st). Any regularly-scheduled processing being done by Henrik's service could have encountered a fatal error caused by that downtime. I don't think this problem will be fixed without Henrik's intervention, which doesn't seem likely in the near future. Emw (talk) 02:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

I wonder why nobody ever uses the E-mail this user link – except myself. Somebody has to tell Henrik that the script needs to be restarted. Henrik has been inactive, so he probably doesn't read this discussion either. E-mail is the way to go. Henrik has repeatedly reacted to my mails when the statistics were down in the past. --Sitacuisses (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

More remarkable - that there seems to be no structure in place, no back up at Wikipedia, to catch something this vital and remedy it immediately. Nobody in the Wikipedia hierarchy who can contact Henrik aside from the standard Wiki email? Is there only one solo individual who has the power over this? Is there no Plan B in case Henrik has walked away? Amazing. Maile66 (talk) 17:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Nothing has been counted since May 19

Unbelievable... I don't understand. Why ? Some explanations would be nice. Thanks.

IP, 25 May 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.91.177 (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

My question, too! GregorHelms (talk) 19:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Ask for a refund? --MZMcBride (talk) 19:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

All sales are final. Killiondude (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

It's back

Looks like page view stats are back, folks -- Boing! said Zebedee 11:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

• News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Simone

Hello, I believe these stats have an audience below its reality. A few weeks ago there was another name for her on WP-PT: Simone_Bittencourt_de_Oliveira --now it´s only Simone, which is the way she is best known really. So this move was correct. But before this happened, her audience was some 100, 125 page views daily --now it´s below 80. So I wonder what happenned and if you could please help me to find out whether the move has also deleted the rest of the page views statistics, since it is now directed to Simone and no longer Simone Bittencourt de Oliveira. I really think that the drop of the audience is related to the move. Thank you very much if you can help!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.21.142.164 (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

traffic statistics

I wanted to tell you that I really enjoy the Traffic Statistics and I'm always surprised with the results.

Thank you

Andy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy2159 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

page ksar hellal on facebook manque une photo; please add a wallpaper to the page "Ksar Hellal" on facebook and thank you ...

page ksar hellal on facebook manque une photo; please add a wallpaper to the page "Ksar Hellal" on facebook and thank you ...

Question on pageview statistics

Henrik - I am curious about the article traffic statistics feature - does this record the number of unique computers viewing the page each day, or the total views (i.e. could include the same person coming back several times in the same day).

I have been watching this for some articles I have written and follow (to see if anyone cares) - got curious about the details.

Thanks

David Clarry DiligentDavidG (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I would be very interested in that fact as well! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.176.148.46 (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Friendly Fire article/ Peg Mullen

Hello This is my first attempt on WikiPedia, so please excuse any mistakes I make. I wanted to ask you about the article you wrote, "Friendly Fire". It was very good, although I thought that Micheal Mullen was killed from South Vietnamese friendly fire. Sgt. Fitzgerald, who as you know informed the Mullen's of their sons death said, "It wasn't American,it was South Vietnamese artillery, that accidentally shelled an American position." After I saw the movie, I went on WikiPedia to look up Peg Mullen, and read your article. It was informative and well written, although I am certainly not an experienced writer as yourself! Please let me know if you or anyone has any views on this matter. Thank you. ~;20:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CAROLINA CATIE (talk • contribs)

Other/more sources for Traffic Data?

Dear Henrik,

I am currently writing my degree (diploma) thesis about Wikipedia. Your traffic statistics at http://dammit.lt/wikistats/ (or webarchive) are very useful and I thank you very much for your great work!

I am just curious if there is any other source or possibility to get data from before 2007?

Regards and thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.176.148.46 (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

• Photography: Making money with free photos

• News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Henrik, my page Canadian Neonatal Network has been speedily deleted becuase of a conflict of interest and copyright infringemnet (much of the material used was from a website that I set up using approved language about the network's bachground, mission, goals, etc). Would it be possible for you to reinstate this, as it seems that I cannot touch it?

Thanks. Smackerella (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Problem with your live edit counter?

Hi. I'm trying to use your "live edit counter" userbox, but I'm not sure if it's working correctly for me. When I look at my own user page, the number displayed in the userbox is always 3,400 (the fixed approximate value I coded in the page source). I'm using Firefox, and I flushed the cache for both my monobook.js and my user page. Any idea what I might be doing wrong? Richwales (talk) 05:43, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

google-search in Vector

Are you able / might I entice you to amend the excellent User:Henrik/sandbox/google-search to work with the new Vector skin? I'd like to use the new skin, but find your google search the single most useful UI feature, pretty much. As far as I can make out, it's not playing with Vector right now. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Smkolins (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I've made it vector compliant, by stealing some code from somewhere else, as you do. diff --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

thanks for stats of page visits

Hi Henrik,

Thanks for the stats on page visits. I consult them every once in a while and it is nice to know how many people have visited the site.

Thanks again for the good work

Endo999 (talk) 22:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

How does one find the current rank of an article? The one listed on "Philanthropy" is constant no matter what year or month I view.

Many thanks! This is an extremely valuable service—I'm wondering whether it might serve as an index of public interest in this subject, which is growing.

George McCully President Catalogue for Philanthropy

GEMcCully (talk) 14:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: User:Petia

Dear Henrik, My name is Petia and I am writing as I need advice on how to proceed with an account i`ve created here and an account that has been created in my name. I am a singer and actress. Last year i`ve realized that someone created an information page about me here on Wikipedia and I think it was someone from Nova TV in Bulgaria (I took part in Celebrity Big Brother that was broadcasted by Nova TV so I guess they`ve created this profile in my name here in Wikipedia). Unfortunately they`ve missed spelled my name and wrote it as PetYa Pavlova instead of PetIa Pavlova. Anyway, now i`ve created my own account under the name Petia Music, which I want to use in order to create a page in my name called just “Petia”. Petia is how as I am known with my music and I release my singles and albums under that name. So, I decided to create a new account in the name of Petia, to which I can contribute and upload information, photos etc. for the people who are interested to know more about me as a performer. I did search in order to know whether someone has created such page already and i`ve realized that there is a profile with the name "Petia" already created, although no one has claimed it or put any information on it. I would like to transfer the page to my account or do whatever is needed so I can link my page accordingly. I will appreciate your help with regards to how could I do so. I look forward to your response Thank you in advance! Regards and Best Wishes Petia —Preceding unsigned comment added by PetiaMusic (talk • contribs) 02:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

• From the team: Changes to the Signpost

• News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more

• In the news: Cancer coverage, cognitive surplus, Wikipedia monarchy, and more

• Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

About wikipedia traffic statistics

I think that the list of differetnt language of wikipedia must be updated because the italian enciclopedia is before the japan with numbers of page.--80.104.2.182 (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Error in statistics?

The Nov. 2009 figures for Kim Yuna have zero one day and over a thousand the next. Three are other zero dayson both sides of high-frequency days for this individual. This really looks like a glitch. Kdammers (talk) 10:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

There are occasional disruptions in the availability of the underlying page view data -- these are caused upstream of Henrik and are outside his control. The three days in 11/2009 with no data occur for all pages, including Kim Yuna. Emw (talk) 12:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Stats drop-off question

I noticed that the last few days the stats on a number of articles I checked dropped off significantly from averages and from same time a week ago. On friday they dropped to 50% and on saturday another 50% from friday (average estimate.) On all the articles I've checked saturday was way below the lowest count so far this year, and is about 10-20% of a typical saturday. Any ideas of why? --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 02:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I noticed the same thing in Wikipedia German. Maybe because of the Soccer World Cup? Or problem with the new skin? Don't know.--KurtR (talk) 03:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm noticing the same thing on the musician and band pages that I watch. Doc2234 (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Meant to swing by last night, but I noticed this as well. After seeing it on multiple pages, I stopped worrying. Btw, Henrik, I love this tool, I use it constantly. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 15:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is caused by a change in the Wikipedia software, there is a reason to worry, or to take some kind of action. However, Henrik is probably not the one who can do something about it. All his tool does is chart the data.--Sitacuisses (talk) 15:57, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Well okay, technically if there's a problem, then I agree it'd be something to worry about. I didn't mean to put it like that; just for me, I thought there was a sudden decrease in interest in some articles relevant to me. Though reading through this talk page finally, I'm not sure how involved Henrik is anymore. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 16:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I've been testing given sites of mine the last few days. Definitely, the system is not reporting correctly. I've emailed Henrik, but not sure what else to do. We have a problem with the system. Maile66 (talk) 01:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I hope it gets fixed soon. I use it daily and was confused why an articles gets ~5k daily and then all of a sudden 800 views. Mike Allen 02:04, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Any word on it getting fixed soon, or at least some sort of acknowledgment that there is a problem? – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I join the chorus who thanks Henrik for his work, and emphasizes the importance of these statistics. RCraig09 (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Short term solution

After doing a random selection, it looks like the counts dropped by around 84%. As a temporary way to compare stats, I multiply the number given by 6, and it seems to equalize fairly well. Hopefully it'll be fixed. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 06:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I was doing something similar, but not nearly as precise. I'll try the 84% technique. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:49, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I emailed User:Midom who collects the underlying data. He answered that the disk had been filled, and he fixed it for now. --Sitacuisses (talk) 08:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

It's not fixed. Stats are still dropped off. Maile66 (talk) 00:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I saw the same problem and thought it was honestly the World Cup that was causing such sharp decreases. But then I checked the article for World Cup... Colipon+(Talk) 00:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Couldn't be a better test page than World Cup. Maile66 (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I think a good number of Wikipedia users, particularly editors, will go on withdrawal if this tool is ever disabled or malfunctions for an extended period of time. Has anyone ever thought about getting Wikipedia to formalize this tool? It's so bloody useful. Colipon+(Talk) 01:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I second that. It's useful for more than just satisfying curiosities. Maybe take it up at the pump or somewhere. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

There are plans to host the underlying data on a WMF- or Toolserver-operated server, and in a more acccessible format. I don't know how far along this process is. Emw (talk) 11:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

• The ideal test page is of course the Main page: http://stats.grok.se/en/201006/Main_page

  June 10: 4.5 million views, June 11: "2.8 million" views, June 12: "904 thousand" views

  --87.79.173.150 (talk) 16:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You got that right! Maile66 (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

It is definitely some problem with Wikipedia; here are some wikistats to compare with Googlestats: Lady Gaga (compare with Google Insights), Barack Obama (compare with Google Insights), Eckhart Tolle (compare with Google Insights). What is important to find out is whether it is just a problem with the stats tool, or whether there is some problem with Wikipedia itself, which is actually stopping certain people from viewing Wikipedia pages. Gregcaletta (talk) 04:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Data for last two days are back in stats.grok.se. Unfortunately still too low, about the half of normal size. --KurtR (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Hello Henrik, I´ve got a question: How sure or rather applicable are data of this tool? At this point a big thank you for being availiable to give answers, conversation with a website is mostly full of missunterstandings :-) Hæggis (talk) 23:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Henrik, thanks for your helpful contributions. Do you have an explanation why your Wikipedia article traffic statistics shows such a sharp decrease on the Main page of (german) Wikipedia? --Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 09:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

It's the same with any other page! The traffic on WP seems to have a lost of ~80 % in the last three or four days. Very mysterious and hardly to believe. -- 79.198.28.33 (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Data for last two days are back in stats.grok.se. Unfortunately still too low, about the half of normal size. --KurtR (talk) 03:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

June 16 Still no stats

Anybody else? I look at various individual pages and see no stats at all for June 15 - not on any page at all. Maile66 (talk) 14:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Data for last two days are back in stats.grok.se. Unfortunately still too low, about the half of normal size. --KurtR (talk) 03:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

• News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news

• In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Stats

Hi,

When viewing page statistics, what does the series of numbers mean? For example (http://stats.grok.se/en/201004/World_cup_competition) , it will say viewed 1,000 times in 201004. What's the 201004?

Could someone install Google Analytics to a wiki page?

Thanks!

Katie 67.220.148.34 (talk) 15:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)weaponryofwords

Hey there. 201004 means 2010 4th month, so April 2010. Coolug (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Coolug.--75.139.106.139 (talk) 00:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Article traffic statistics

Hi.

I really like your page counter tool. It has encouraged me to keep working on Wikipedia. Writing about Serbian rock, certainly is not the thing everybody would browse at Wikipedia to read, but your statistics counter showed me that people are interested, and I thank you for that. Cheers! Milosppf (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denizen (2010 film)

Now that the film has been released, I'd like you as closer to take a look at User:Action grrl/workspace/Denizen (film) to see if the additional work to the article has it ready for WP:Incubation or even perhaps a return to mainspace. Thank you, --Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

addendum

A few months have passed since the article AFD and subsequent userfication. Now that the film has its release, and after User:Action grrl received my input and assistance with expanding, copyediting, re-sectioning, and adding additional sources to the article, I went ahead and moved it to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Denizen (film) where it now awaiting evaluation. Thank you for the courtesy you extended to this editor. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:27, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

File:American Idol Experience Logo.PNG is always made orphaned please help !!!

i wanna use this file in the article "American Idol Experience", but whenever i edit this page using this file, it is made orphaned immediately and i recieve messages in my talk page as follows: "Thanks for uploading File:American Idol Experience Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).". I don't know what to do as the file already has a Non-free media use rationale, please help me to use this file in the above mentioned article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dyn ip (talk • contribs) 08:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

• Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons

• News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more

• In the news: Wikipedia better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject U2

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks !

for having developped stats.grok.se  ! Two little hints : maybe some users would appreciate

• a field "1st quarter 2010" (and in some days, when the second quarter is through, also "2nd quarter 2010")
• a field (2010) saying (today) 1.1. - 23.6.2010
• a field "2009" (= 1.1. - 31.12.2009)

I would appreciate if I could type stats.grok.se/2009 and get the field last mentioned.

This, of course, just as a hint (from a industrious German WP editor)  :-) --Neun-x (talk) 08:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)