significant mistake within the article "Superrationality" edit
The example on "prisoner's dilemma" given doesn't match with
a) the article Prisoner's dilemma Prisoner's dilemma. Especially: The payoff matrix shows -1 /-1 for cooperation - which is a better "system-result" than any other output (-3/0 // 0/-3 // -2 /-2) in this article the cooperation-result is 200$ and the other results are equal (200 / 0 // 0/200) or lower (1+1).
b) In this article the prisoner's dilemma is a zero-sum-game. The principle article on game theory Game theory says in paragraph Zero-sum / non-zero-sum: "Many games studied by game theorists (including the famed prisoner's dilemma) are non-zero-sum games, because the outcome has net results greater or less than zero."
Please consider changing the article super rationality