Hendersonhenderson

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert E. Marvin (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert E. Marvin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert E. Marvin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Hendersonhenderson! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Robert E. Marvin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Robert E. Marvin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

article deleted contest

Robert e. Marvin page was deleted on G11. unambiguous advertisement or promotion grounds. The subject has passed almost 20 years ago and there is not product/bias promotion. The content proposed is similar to the information provided in the South Carolina Encyclopedia. References may be added to create page again. Please restore page for edits.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Robert E. Marvin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Robert E. Marvin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hendersonhenderson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock to make edits. please state why we are being blocked for advertising only. what sources need to be added? the bio of the person the article is about has been dead for many years not promoting. there is a similar article on south Carolina encyclopedia page.

Decline reason:

That was one of the worst violations of WP:PROMO I've ever seen. Totally unencyclopedic in tone. You need to convince us you understand this if you ever wish to be unblocked. I also see a likely violation of WP:COI here. Look, it's great that you are trying to promote Mr. Marvin, and it sounds like he was a good and interesting person. But Wikipedia isn't the place for this. Yamla (talk) 14:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hendersonhenderson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Editor, please note this man, John McKissick was inducted into the South Carolina hall of fame the year after Robert Marvin. Trying to create a page similar. there is no conflict of interest. We also have sources and can rewrite in 'tone' this page has. Thank you for your kindness. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McKissick

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra 15:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note that shared accounts are not permitted. You say "we"; only one person can have access to this page. John McKissick is nowhere near as promotional as the article you were trying to create. If it was, WP:OTHERSTUFF would apply and we'd delete that article, not allow you to create another one violating WP:PROMO. You claim there is no conflict of interest. Please state your exact relationship to Marvin and exactly why you are so interested in creating an article about him. Note that off-wiki evidence shows a clear conflict of interest for someone with the last name, Henderson. --Yamla (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please read User:Deepfriedokra/g11 for more information about WP:CSD#G11 deletions and promotional editing in general. Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID if they apply.-- Deepfriedokra 15:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)