Welcome!

edit

Hello, Heartfield01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

As you will notice I have removed the external link to your vindictive Aftenposten "spoof" web page. Such payback excursions cannot count on Wikipedia for their publicity.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco 19:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Guide to referencing

edit

Click on "show" to open contents.

Image:Vanishing-venice.jpg

edit

You uploaded this image as your copyright. Presumably you are Patrick Hughes. Otherwise, could you explain how you have the copyright. If you own the copyright, you don't have to relinquish all rights to the work for it to be on wikipedia. It can be uploaded under Fair use (though actually not by you, only by another editor), in which case you relinquish no rights. However, its use on wikipedia would then be very limited, probably to just the article on the artist. Public Domain release is fine, if you are happy with that, but Wikipedia is quite content with a free licence, such as GFDL: either option means the image can be used freely throughout wikipedia (e.g. maybe in articles such as Venice). The V&A museum has released a lot of images under GFDL. See User_talk:VAwebteam#GFDL. If you do release under PD (or GFDL) you might want to state that the licence applies only to the specific file, not the original image—unless of course you wish otherwise. I see you have released other images, so the same applies to them. You can reply here, or on my talk page. Tyrenius (talk) 00:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS It would be great to get an angled photo of Vanishing Venice so the 3-d surface was apparent. Tyrenius (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

I noticed you had edited since my posts above, but not replied. It is important that wikipedia establishes confirmation of the copyright status of the images with PD tags. For example, a statement on www.patrickhughes.co.uk that the images were released as PD would suffice and this could be linked to from the image page on wikipedia. Thanks. Tyrenius (talk) 16:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've posted on Talk:Patrick Hughes (artist). Tyrenius (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alternate Account

edit

Are you able to confirm whether James Heartfield (talk · contribs) is your alternate account? Singularity42 (talk) 20:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Yes, Sorry, I made it by mistake. It seems to be harder to get rid of than create.Heartfield01 (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:Cathy Rogers

edit

Well this is interesting, however I fear it falls foul of WP:NOR and therefore inadmissable as a source anyone could have written that and claimed they were Cathy Rogers and wrote that. There was a similar issue here (at the bottom of it) where a user had recieved an e-mail from the subject's creator but could not put it in as it was original research. The Channel 4 broadcast where it was mentioned i'm afraid is the reliable source rather that the screenshot. If you can get something that says what's in the e-mail from a published source (ie. a Newspaper, Channel 4 etc.) Then you can use it but the main problem is that that screenshot can't be used to source that, sorry. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Now that's more like it. Seems reliably published to me. If you want to use the book to source it, make sure you include the ISBN number. There's a template here you can use for that i've lifted from List of sports clubs inspired by others (look at it through the edit view).
Enciclopédia do Futebol Brasileiro Lance Volume 1. Rio de Janeiro: Aretê Editorial S/A. 2001. p. 120. ISBN 8588651017.     

Try to fill in most of the information required here. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply


Culture Vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts. London: Policy exchange. 2006. p. 72. ISBN 0-9551909. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help) 

Heartfield01 (talk) 10:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

You actually do it like this on the SC main page as a reference, like this, (look in edit view) [1] The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Prisonrainbow.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Prisonrainbow.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no use for image

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Films about Race has been accepted

edit
 
Films about Race, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 16:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Heartfield01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Culture Vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts. London: Policy exchange. 2006. p. 72. ISBN 0-9551909. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help)