User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2022/September

JCW-CleanerBot 2

Hello Headbomb. I see you have returned to following me and edit warring with me. Why did you begin at this time with this edit? Why did you then revert that edit and make this one in stead? I note that this includes edit warring using your bot which is certainly against WP:BOTPOL. Invasive Spices (talk) 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't follow you, you simply insist on putting wrong things in the |journal= parameter which gets put in the semi-monthly WP:TYPO report. The name of the journal is Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences not Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I used your Talk: page and you have retaliated with more edit warring ([1] and [2]). No one should discourage Talk: discussion.

You're telling me who owns Wikipedia and it isn't myself. You show a great deal of confidence that I am unable to obtain remedy on Wikipedia. Unfortunately I think you are correct. Nonetheless you should stop being so confrontational and abusive. Invasive Spices (talk) 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I fail to see how I'm being abusive here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Selectively creating trouble with one user's contributions and responding to Talk: discussion with revert warring and escalation of the same behaviour fits the definition. Invasive Spices (talk) 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm literally doing the opposite of 'selectively creating trouble'. If you have nothing productive to say, we're done here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

You continue to Selectively create trouble with one user's contributions. You are further escalating to retaliate because I have attempted to reasonably use Talk: pages in stead of edit warring. That is quite serious.

You ceased behaving in this manner toward me some time ago. Why did you cease at that time? Then you resumed. Why did you resume at that time?

I see that you have a long history of widely observed conduct problems. How do you continue to do things like this? How do you have the necessary support to continue using Wikipedia while doing things like this? Invasive Spices (talk) 8 September 2022 (UTC)

"I have attempted to reasonably use Talk: pages", Talk:Agriculture in California remains entirely devoid of any discussion on this topic. I also note that you yourself, above, accepted consensus was against you on this issue. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

• (Talk page stalker): I had a look at this and I'm wondering why you insist on adding initialisms between parentheses if you have already given the full name of a journal or entity? It's wrong and as has been explained to you, it screws up things in, for example, WP:TYPO. AS for talk page discussions, can you provide me with diffs where Headbomb is abusive or unresponsive to you? Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Headbomb, why did you cease harassing me at the time that you did? Why did you resume harassing me at the time that you did? Because of the seriousness of this particular issue I'm going to ignore any distraction tactics to take us away from that issue until those two questions are resolved. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 September 2022 (UTC)

I never ceased nor resumed "harrassing" you because I never started in the first place. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

You've moved on to boldly lying. The next question is: Why are you selectively creating problems at Agriculture in California? Why are you not engaging in the same type of harassment under the same pretense on other pages I have edited? Invasive Spices (talk) 10 September 2022 (UTC)

• Invasive Spices, I'm losing patience with you. You cannot accuse an editor in good standing of "boldly lying". Headbomb has given a perfectly reasonable explanation for the edits that you consider harassment. Cut it out. Any more personal attacks here or any other disruption and I'll block you. If you cannot let this go, by all means take this to WP:ANI (but I predict a sizeable boomerang in the form of a block. --Randykitty (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Dickonlandia (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Nice try, you have -498 bytes. Dickonlandia (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your point? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 09:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)