User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2017/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
religious interpretation of the big bang theory
http://aboutislam.net/science/faith-science/big-bang-islamic-perspective/ http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2016/04/27/13812/ http://www.irfi.org/articles2/articles_3951_4000/islamic%20concept%20of%20creation%20of%20universehtml.htm http://scienceislam.com/bigbang.php
Here are the source
It would be awful to remove the verses because of some anti-islamic or anti-religious bias Therefore I request you not to remove the verses and not to paste the your unfair zext which smallifies the islamic viewpoint regarding this article relative to the other articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrk786 (talk • contribs) 06:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Pintoch (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Great Annihilator, redux
Hi Headbomb- Did you ever see this post?: User_talk:Headbomb/Archives/2016/July#Great_Annihilator. Eric talk 05:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
That DOI
10.11648 is a company called Science Publishing Group, which is listed by Beall as a predatory open access publisher. As it happens, I watch for links to that DOI root and also to sciencepublishinggroup.com. Most of what turns up is, to put it charitably, unlikely to significantly advance the sum of human knowledge. Guy (Help!) 15:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- OK? Not really sure what you want me to say here... Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Nothing, I was just letting you know in case you were interested. Predatory journals can get DOIs. Guy (Help!) 16:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm fully aware of that. Don't worry, I'm not about to cite anything from International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics (or worse, publish in it). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Some of the titles are amazing, aren't they? Guy (Help!) 16:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- A rose by any other name... and all that. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Dad used to collect odd road names (as in odd names used instead of "road"). He had them ina notebook: a road by any other name would still spell a street. And that is not a joke, he really did. Guy (Help!)
- I wonder if he heard of Whip-Ma-Whop-Ma-Gate. DrChrissy (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Dad used to collect odd road names (as in odd names used instead of "road"). He had them ina notebook: a road by any other name would still spell a street. And that is not a joke, he really did. Guy (Help!)
- A rose by any other name... and all that. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Some of the titles are amazing, aren't they? Guy (Help!) 16:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm fully aware of that. Don't worry, I'm not about to cite anything from International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics (or worse, publish in it). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Nothing, I was just letting you know in case you were interested. Predatory journals can get DOIs. Guy (Help!) 16:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Headbomb, in nucleon I see your point (in undoing my recent changes) about not making it seem like all the nucleons are identical and I agree (my background is in particle physics where they are often considered to be the same particle with a slight difference in that one has a top and the other a bottom quark, for example in nucleon decay there is no difference, but I still agree with your point). For your same reason, I still think the proton & neutron should be mentioned earlier: in the first sentence rather than the third. But I'll make a couple of other changes one at a time so you can comment on each individually if you want to undo it :-) DavRosen (talk) 13:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Message from Girlfromthemain
hello. Took me awhile to understand how you message here. I'll get straight to point.
Rjwilmsi, All connectors leads me to u, headbomb. . I'm looking at obtaining more knowledge in Lymes disease. Activation immunotherapies, B. burgdorferi, C. psittaci, morgellons, are areas of interest. From what I've read, you are quite knowledgeable. .plse let me know if u can be of help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girlfromthemain (talk • contribs) 01:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Girlfromthemain: I'm not really sure where you get the impression I am knowledgeable about these things (I am not). For general information, you can always look up our articles on Lyme disease, Activation immunotherapy, B. burgdorferi, C. psittaci, and morgellons, but if you're looking for medical advice and possible treatments, you'll want to get in touch with a licensed physician since there is no guarantee our articles are accurate. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- @headbomb ..someone referenced you to me.. Guess they mistaken you for another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girlfromthemain (talk • contribs) 03:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)