User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2008/August
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
No thanks for reverting!
Damnit! I don’t like this reverting and re-reverting. I don’t buy your argument that the version you like sufficently covers the issue of mixing ml and mL in the same article. The text you cite as supposedly covering that issue undermines what you say in black & white by using an entirely different example on an entirely different issue: the mixing of ml with L. Read what I posed on Talk:MOSNUM. I don’t give a darn what version of the text is there or who wrote it. If you want verbiage of your choosing, then write it yourself. But stop telling me it’s clear when it’s not. And it won’t unless it contains either A) an explicit example of what not to do, or B) an explicit admonition not to mix ml and mL. Greg L (talk) 02:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
GA Promo
Hey just letting you know that I reviewed your GA nomination for Wetting and promoted it to GA status! Intothewoods29 (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Cool! Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 19:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just a gentle suggestion that you try not to act as though you own articles that you edit a lot or even ones you created. Other editors have a viewpoint and it is a little disconcerting to see perfetly good attempt at improving the wording reverted ... build upon it by all means but reverting because you "didn't like the prose" was just a tad insensitive. :) Abtract (talk) 23:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)