January 2009

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Troy Davis case, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Troy Davis case was changed by Havvic (u) (t) deleting 7858 characters on 2009-01-31T06:47:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Reply

- Peripitus (Talk) 07:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Havvic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No legitimate reason for this bullying and nothing whatsoever to apologise for. Havvic (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No reason for unblocking given, either. (For the record, you have been blocked for edit warring, apparently using multiple accounts.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Havvic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There has been no 'edit warring'. Talk page discussion has been pursued. And if you listen to yourself you may realise how ridiculous you sound to suggest the many persons contending against propaganda viewpoints on these pages are really just one, in order to shut them up. As you admit there is no legitimate reason for the bullyin and nothing to be apologised for, unblock

Decline reason:

Obvious sock of banned user DavidYork71. You are not welcome at Wikipedia. The sooner you realize this, the sooner you can move on with your life. - auburnpilot talk 14:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.