HastyBriar321
 | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
November 2017 edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui 雲水 08:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC) |
How am I a sockpuppet?... HastyBriar321 (talk) 08:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
You guys didn't even open a sockpuppet investigation towards me; what proof do you have? HastyBriar321 (talk) 09:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
HastyBriar321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. I would just like an explanation into how this conclusion was reached. HastyBriar321 (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Placing CU block -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
 |
CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). Comments: To answer your unblock request, |
HastyBriar321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. No one's even answering my question as to how that conclusion was reached. I just want an explanation so then I could properly defend myself. HastyBriar321 (talk) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There's technical information linking the accounts. There's also considerable behavioural evidence. A sockpuppetry investigation is not necessary. Huon (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.