July 2012

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Monica (entertainer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. In addition, as the edit notice stated "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should not be inserted" - The material you added needs a reference that supports what you added. See also WP:BLP Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Monica (entertainer), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Kim Zolciak. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rebecca Black. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rebecca Black, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. added known false info to bio articles - latest is falsifying birth location. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently deliberately adding false information into articles. Please don't continue to do this after the block expires, or you may well be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello, HasanFerdinand, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Patois, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Changed article to state the opposite of what the references support. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Only warning

edit

You've been around long enough and been blocked often enough to know that you need to include sources when adding information to biography articles. If you continue to ignore the concerns raised on your talk page by adding unsourced content you will be blocked.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deliberate falsification of info that is well referenced. This is adding info that is known to be fake, not just a lack of references to support it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Rebecca Black. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Guerillero | My Talk 21:00, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply