Welcome!

edit

Hello, Harry-Oscar2323, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Rocky De La Fuente. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to August by Cake has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Harry-Oscar2323, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Harry-Oscar 1812 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

UKIP

edit

We have a label that reads

"Please do NOT add "Libertarianism" here, even if sourced. Reliable sources dispute whether the UKIP is actually libertarian. Consensus should be achieved on the talk page before it is added. " Please discus on the talk page why you keep adding libertarian on the UKIP talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit
 

Your recent editing history at UK Independence Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Conservative Party (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to John Rees-Evans. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Joobo (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply