Happydaise

Happydaise, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Happydaise! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Your recent editing history at Organizational behavior shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bradv 00:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes i noticed that despite an open-ended dispute resolution process is still underway this other person decided to change the article text under dispute. I decided not to change their edit. however i hope that someone may see that they did this- all the while a dispute resolution is on-going. Do you suggest listing this as edit warring on the noticeboard. Which notice-board if so?Happydaise (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't matter the reason for your edits, The three-revert rule is a hard limit that may not be crossed. You reverted here and here. Don't do it again or you'll be blocked.

The point is: don't dispute over content on the article. Instead, discuss on the talk page in a civilized manner, until you come up with a consensus. What the two of you have done so far is yell and insult each other, and then look for someone else to step in to make a decision. You don't need a moderator — you can figure this out yourselves. Bradv 03:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Happydaise reported by User:Bradv (Result: ). Thank you. Bradv 12:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Organizational behavior

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)