HappyINC

Welcome to my talk page!

Promotional editing

Following up on ClueBot, I found I had to revert several of your edits that had not been reverted already. The pattern, in my opinion, is attempting to promote certain TV shows in a way that does not follow Wikipedia standards. If you continue to edit in this way, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Object Shows (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Object Shows and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Object Shows, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, HappyINC! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cleo & Cuquin (TV series) has been accepted

Cleo & Cuquin (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tiny Pop, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 16:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molang has been accepted

Molang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First Media (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Media (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Object Shows

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Object Shows".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Family Guy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inanimate Insanity (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inanimate Insanity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inanimate Insanity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First Media (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Media (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 15:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Reply

Thanks for your message. You have been warned before about promotional editing, and you are simply not following our guidelines. Your article was pure promo with no indication of how it met our notability guidelines, just a list of brands.

Please read the following regarding writing an article

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Most of your refs appeared to be PR posting, interviews or otherwise affiliated to the company.
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Note also that your article had virtually no facts about the company, such as number of employees, profits or turnover.

• you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Most of your article was just blatant promo like They're [sic] brands... help women live happier, more fulfilled lives ... a fun creativity life hacks DIY channel
• there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
• If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HappyINC. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HappyINC|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI query above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Draft:Untitled Mr. Men & Little Miss film. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Copyright infringement

I can see that you are a relatively new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article BabyRiki. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

HappyINC, this is your third written copyright notice (see here and here for prior warnings). This in addition to another copyvio that I am currently tagging for revdel at Draft:Untitled Mr. Men & Little Miss film. I note you added these last two recent copyvio after you were given two prior copyright warnings. Please consider this a final warning: Do not copy and paste text from other sources into Wikipedia. If there are other articles where you have made edits that violate copyrights, please go back, remove them, and request revision deletion. If there are other copyright violations that have not yet been deleted and don't know how to request a revision deletion, let me know and I will do it for you. Thank you, Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

One more article referred for rev del to deal with a copyright violation at Florrie's Dragons. Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

This is just getting out of hand

Removing premises from my articles are just pissing me off. Every TV show article needs a premise, man! Without premises, It just shrinks the article and have new viewers not know what the show is ABOUT! HappyINC (talk) 03:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

SERIOUSLY, STOP DESTROYING MY ARTICLES!! HappyINC (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Calm down. You don't own these articles, they are not yours. See WP:OWN. All I am doing is removing copyright violations. I don't think you understand how important it is to avoid copyright violations, despite being warned numerous times. Please read the copyright policies that you have been referred to several times now. Regards, Aoi (青い) (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

1. Well, I know they are not my articles, but I created those articles. 2. I did avoid them on some of my articles. HappyINC (talk) 12:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

You must avoid them in all articles, not just some of them. On another note, I notice a lot of the logos you uploaded were done with dubious licenses too. Finally, please take a look at WP:INDENT to learn how to indent comments on talk pages. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CalOtter (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shamrock Holdings, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Don't make assumptions, like you did here--your assumption was entirely false. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

@Aoi: Aoi, I am a well-average editor here. I edit things what I think is true, what I believe is true, and what IS true. And even what I see. I especially prevent vandalism worthy, like in this edit here (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/888578931) About Shamrock Holdings, It was founded by Roy E. Disney, and it did a lot of agreements with The Walt Disney Company, That’s how I think Shamrock Holdings would be owned by The Walt Disney Company. Also, to be fair, Due to you reverting my edits so quickly, I fairly assume that you are spying on my contributions. Thanks, HappyINC (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I never said you were a bad editor; you seem to be an editor acting in generally good faith. You just seem to have trouble understanding certain Wikipedia policies such as WP:Verifiability and WP:COPYVIO. What you think is true or what you believe is true are not relevant; Wikipedia's policies state "Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources." If your contributions don't meet this policy, you should not be surprised if other editors remove them. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Family Guy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 19:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regency Enterprises, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Nick Jr. Too

As you can see here, Wikipedia articles are not suppose to be "[d]irectories, directory entries, electronic program[me] guides, or resources for conducting business. For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc." This means that TV channel articles should not simply be large lists of shows that are/have been broadcast. Even then, things on Wikipedia should have sources to back them up. If you need help learning about sources, etc., I'm willing to give you help. Foxnpichu (talk) 20:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HappyINC reported by User:Electricburst1996 (Result: ). Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

@Electricburst1996: ARE YOU SERIOUSLY KIDDING ME?!? YOU SERIOUSLY FREAKINGREPORTED ME?? ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME? NOW MY ACCOUNT WILL BE BLOCKED! I AM A WELL AVERAGE EDITOR HERE!! YOU CAN’T DO THAT TO ME! I LOVE WIKIPEDIA!! YOU GOT ME FREAKING OUT RIGHT NOW!! HappyINC (talk) 22:17, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jam Filled Entertainment

The article Jam Filled Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP, very limited RS mentions, and those are in passing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jam Filled Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jam Filled Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jam Filled Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Bro, you can’t be serious. There is absolutely NO reason why Jam Filled Entertainment should be deleted, Right now, I expanded the page, and removed copyvio parts. HappyINC (talk) 22:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Sesame Workshop

Where exactly did you get the idea that HBO owns Sesame Workshop, as you said in this edit? Trivialist (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

@Trivialist: I thought that it did. Considering the fact that all of SW’s programs air on HBO’s kids block and produced for Sesame Street and Esme & Roy. And HBO made a deal with SW, so that made me think that HBO owned SW. HappyINC (talk) 22:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

When editing articles, it's best to only add things that you can provide references for, or are things that you're really really sure about. Trivialist (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Animanimals. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aoi (青い) (talk) 11:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Aoi: OK, 1. First of all, I didn’t assume ownership at Animanimals, did you mean the broadcast section? If so, that doesn’t mean anything about ownership. It’s not like all the show’s broadcasters owns the show at once. 2. I am not disruptive editor. My truth is, that I hate getting my hard work erased even when it’s true. And sourced. And yet, I’m just trying to save my articles I created from getting redirected or deleted. And that happens because of “weak information”. 3. Question for you. Are you spying on my contributions? I asked that because when I make an edit, You come immediately and revert it. 4. Another question. Is minimodding on Wikipedia allowed? Cus I say “Reverted edits” and I warn users including IP users for vandalism and unnecessary stuff. 5: Me being accused really gets on my nerves. I’m helping, dude. I am a good editor. Sorry for these mistakes. Thanks, HappyINC (talk) 11:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

(1) See WP:OWN. You are displaying ownership of articles. You consistently edit war to have the articles your way and you refuse to compromise on talk pages. When other people try to fix articles that you feel you have a stake in to meet WP policies, you constantly revert it back and refuse to listen or even consider the policy-based reasons for the changes. This is the type of behavior that gets people blocked. (2) Your behavior is disruptive. (3) I am not "spying" on your contributions; you are editing articles on my Watchlist. Whenever you make an edit to an article on my Watchlist, I get an email notification stating an edit was made. (4) I don't know what you mean by "minimodding." (5) I've said before that I think you're editing in good faith, and I still believe that. Some of your contributions are good and you're contributing in an area that needs more attention. But if people make changes to articles you've started, they're usually making it for a good reason and you should at least consider the reasons before edit warring with ridiculously disruptive edit summaries like "Dude. Doesn't matter." Finally, please indent when discussing things on talk pages. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Aoi: My point is, I’m only trying to be like you guys and the other admin Wikipedians. My edits to be so good, so that one day I could either become an admin, or be a special editor, and earn bannerstars! But I fail due to edit reverts, warnings like these, copyvio problems, and my disruptive behavior. And what I mean by “mini modding”, I mean that I’m not an admin nor a special editor, Using “Reverted *number* edits by *user*: *reason*” in my edit summaries and warning an IP user ([here], user removed all sources from Molang, and added unsourced content). That’s what I’m here on Wikipedia for. HappyINC (talk) 01:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The VeggieTales Show, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Yep, I saw this coming. Also, I didn’t mean to restore the bad grammar (I noticed that once I looked in my edit.) But still, If DWA acquired Big Idea and the classic VT show, then made VT in the House and in the City, then they have to make the new show, too. HappyINC (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

There is a difference between acquiring/owning a company and producing a show. AT&T/WarnerMedia owns Warner Bros., but no one claims that AT&T/WarnerMedia is the production company behind The Big Bang Theory. Unless they are specifically credited as a production company (or are otherwise mentioned as a production company in a reliable source), DWA shouldn't be mentioned as a production company. Aoi (青い) (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Fox owns Regency?

Where does it say that? --LegerPrime (talk) 18:42, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Which article did you read that states 20th Century Fox owned 20% of Regency Enterprises? the ones I read only state their 20% stake in New Regency Productions. --LegerPrime (talk) 20:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Blues Clues & You!

HappyINC, this isn't life and death; it's Wikipedia, and not worth getting all worked up over. Of course, I say that having gotten pissed off about things that have happened here, so I can sympathize. However, it's obvious from your talk page that your behavior on this article, working with the other editors who also care for it, is problematic. The trouble is that you don't take input from other editors and learn from their feedback. I've said this to you before: if you don't correct it, you're working towards a block for disruptive editing. That would be unfortunate because you're obviously dedicated and enthusiastic about editing for WP, and lord knows we need it, especially for kids TV. I think that if you want to continue, you need to learn to take feedback and learn from it. Perhaps a solution is to stick with fighting vandalism, and stay away from research and adding content. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

I do not want to continue my disruptive behavior. I take feedback. And I pretty much did good here on Wikipedia before this happened. Again, I have been reverting and warning users like you guys do, especially Aoi. I don’t see why what I did today became such a big deal. (I will explain more of me later.) HappyINC (Let’s chat!) 23:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Part of the problem is that you are running to hit the revert button too fast. A lot of your issues would be avoided if, rather than instantly hitting the revert button, you first take a minute to consider why an editor made an edit (or reverted your edit), or leave a message asking why your edit was reverted. You seem to be assuming that every single edit you are making is correct, and that every page needs to appear the way you want it to appear, when that is not the case. For example, I reverted one of your edits yesterday because you removed a citation needed tag and tacked on a source that did not support the statement on which the citation needed tag was attached. You didn't even stop to consider this; you just reverted the edit back. Please stop doing things like this, it's very disruptive and will eventually get you blocked if you continue. Aoi (青い) (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

@Aoi: Okay, this took me a while. The reason I am “disruptive”, because I am very sensitive about my edits. When I see my hard work get erased or reverted, I flip out and go crazy. Here’s a lot of things I have to talk about. Now let’s talk about distribution. For Nickelodeon. Nick is owned by Viacom, right? And you say having Viacom there is “unnecessary” because Nick would obviously distribute. If it’s network is going to obviously distribute, and having the original owner there is “unnecessary”, then a distributor parameter for TV shows shouldn’t even exist. It makes no sense to even have a distributor parameter if having the owner of the network is unnecessary. (first discovered at School of Rock (TV series).) In my opinion, that just sounds very stupid and dumb, and doesn’t make any sense. There is a confusion for shows on Nick Jr for what Nick DOES own. Most of their shows are distributed by Spin Master. I barely know what show does Nick own. IT IS VERY CONFUSING FOR KIDS’ TV OF WHAT THEY DISTRIBUTE. Blue’s Clues & You!: It’s produced by 9 Story Media Group and Brown Bag Films. Sourced or not, it’s pretty obvious that 9 Story will distribute in Canada and worldwide. Wayback to The VeggieTales Show, NBCUniversal and DreamWorks owns Big Idea Entertainment, the producer of the show. They produce for the franchise, acquired the original series, made VT in the House and VT in the City, then they have to make the that series too. It’s OBVIOUS. To be honest, you guys just don’t make any sense sometimes. HappyINC (Let’s chat!) 13:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

It is not obvious. I mentioned this on the article talk page a few days ago but I will repeat it here: Just because a company produces a show doesn't mean the same company will distribute it. It depends on the show and, a lot of the time, who owns the intellectual property. In this case, Nickelodeon/Viacom owns the IP and they also have their own Canadian affiliate; it seems very unlikely that anyone except Nickelodeon/Viacom would handle distribution. It is possible for a third party to distribute, but because there is possible ambiguity, I am asking for a source. Everything on Wikipedia must be verifiable. Thanks. Aoi (青い) (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

While it's commendable that you care so much, it's not worth being disruptive. It's not worth it to "flip out and go crazy." Again, it's the very thing that will get you banned. The frustrating thing for me is that I'm spending all this time trying to mentor you, and help you manage the policies and procedures here (including the verifiability policy Aoi cites above), but you seem entrenched in your negative and disruptive behaviors. You don't seem to want to learn. You will be banned if you don't stop. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Molang. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The content you restored is obviously not encyclopedic, properly verified, or neutral. Did you use rollback for these reverts? And did you explain what you were doing? If you did use rollback, that may well be an abuse of the tool. Drmies (talk) 21:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

• Again, I do not understand why you are adding unencyclopedic and unverified information, again. Drmies (talk) 00:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

You can look for yourself now

The numberblocks episodes are out on YouTube If you want to find them . Ok please do not get rid of this talk because as much as You do, I don’t want to ever talk about this again Yours sincerely92.11.248.220 (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

I DON’T HAVE THE URGE TO TALK RIGHT NOW, OKAY?! HappyINC (talk) 15:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC) Ok then STOP BEING SO RUDE AND PUTTING YOURSELF FIRST! DO YOU KNOW WHT ASD STANDS FOR EVEN MEAN? RUDEO!92.11.248.220 (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Signature

Hey, I noticed that you seem to be manually inserting your custom signature (HappyINC) into your talk page comments. If you go into your account preferences (you need to be on desktop rather than mobile to do this), under the "User profile" tab, you can insert your custom signature there so you don't have to manually input every time you sign a post. I hope this helps. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Aoi: Ok, got it. I did the things I could. To be honest, inserting my custom signature manually was kinda stressful. I was wondering how being a miniadmin works, What I mean by “mini-admin”, when I’m not an admin, I try do the things like you guys do, but i end up screwing up by my disruptive editing... HappyINC (Let’s chat!) 23:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The VeggieTales Show, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 05:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Arthurfan828. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User_talk:HappyINC. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. This message is a bit late but you did this to the section “You can look for yourself now” thank you. Arthurfan828 (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry

HappyINC, I wanted to apologize for accidentally reverting your edit here. I was scrolling through my Watchlist and accidentally hit rollback while scrolling. Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Astroblast! can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 22:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Behavior and rudeness

Seems like your behavior has gotten a little more aggressive. You don’t want to get blocked by someone, right? Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

No, I don’t. I am very serious about my edits. As far from now, Each time you and others gotta mess with production in show’s articles, I revert it back then Aoi and Waylif come behind my back. *I* try to ration it out. That’s what pisses me off. And if I got blocked I would be super pissed and leave the internet. These are examples why I deal with a bunch of crap in my life on the internet. HappyINC (💬) 21:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Are you sure? You appear to take Wikipedia like it’s your life from what I have seen (Profanity in edits, raging in all caps, etc.) and most of the time you don’t read the sources correctly (I’m talking about Bluey, I’ve still found nothing regarding it being on CBeebies UK) or keeping in something (Like putting Disney in the Totally Spies! page) just because you want to. Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Happy, you’ve continually used profanity in your edit summaries, and harassed people, just because they don’t agree with your edits or are fixing your mistakes. Also, nobody’s "messing" with production in show’s articles, Wikipedia is a project, editors can edit pages if they want to, wether you like it or not. This isn’t "HappyIncpedia", it’s Wikipedia. Users aren’t gonna agree with you everytime, you don’t have any excuse to be rude. If you’re angry about a edit, keep it to your self and don’t rage over it in your edit summary, that’s not what that’s for. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 20:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

I don't mean to be insulting, but I wonder if this is a case of Wikipedia:Competence is required. Happy, editing Wikipedia isn't for everyone; like I always say, "Wikipedia may be the encyclopedia anyone can edit, but not everyone does." I would add, in this situation, that not everyone should. It may just not be a good time for you to edit Wikipedia. I have a feeling, though, that Wikipedia will always be here when you gain competency and want to return. I'm also sure that you'll be welcomed back. It's a sure way to avoid a ban, since that's the direction you're heading. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 04:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

I’m not heading for bans or blocks. Plus, I never said or taken it like I “own Wikipedia”. I 100% guarantee know that. Like I had said before, what pisses me off is when I make a good faith edit, a few days later someone removes it. I revert it back and try to make you guys understand then the admins come behind my back. Aside from that, I’m barely active on Wikipedia anymore. I do what I do elsewhere. And stuff like this, I always have to deal with a bunch of crap like this nowadays. HappyINC (💬) 04:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Just because your edits are in good faith doesn't mean they’re correct. When somebody reverts your edits, you should read their edit summary, they tell you what you did wrong in your edit and how to fix them. You need to understand that your edits aren’t always correct, it’s nothing to get mad over, they’re just trying to keep the page in good shape and help you. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

A whole year ago about this, from the start of this conversation, I try to get the thing that caused this out my system, but yet you have to bring it up and make me more stressed. HappyINC (💬) 19:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Out Of The Blue Enterprises Is Still In New York, NY

To be honest, there is no 9 Story USA logo. On new episodes of Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood called Margaret's Birthday Buddy and Margaret's Birthday Party, the Out of the Blue Enterprises logo is still alive. The Out of the Blue Enterprises office is still in New York, NY. Blue's Clues & You, future episodes of Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood, Creative Galaxy, and Wishenpoof might both have the Out of the Blue Enterprises logo after the ending credits of those shows. (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Ummm, why are you telling this here? I think you should be looking for the talk page of 9 Story Media Group. HappyINC (💬) 21:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

"Draft:Untitled Mr. Men & Little Miss film" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draft:Untitled Mr. Men & Little Miss film. Since you had some involvement with the Draft:Untitled Mr. Men & Little Miss film redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Why on earth am I keep getting randomly blocked?

I notice that when I try to revert an edit, they say that I am blocked from editing, and I BARELY done anything. Now there’s one with a reason I can’t understand, and I am blocked for 6 months. What is going on? HappyINC (💬) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

I don't see any blocks in your block log. This likely means that the IP address you are connecting from is blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Harold and the Purple Crayon film

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untitled Harold and the Purple Crayon film".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Powerbirds

I have reverted your inappropriate move of Draft:Powerbirds to Powerbirds. It was submitted for review only a few days ago and rejected. Since then, the changes to the article have not resolved those issues. It should not be moved until the problems have been resolved and only then after review. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

I have again reverted an inappropriate move of this article by you. Do not move this article again or you may not be able to edit Wikipedia. It has only been 9 days since you inappropriately moved it last. Let the process take as long as necessary. Wikipedia is not working to a deadline. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:52, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

About your PowerBirds draft

Hello, I see you are having trouble improving your draft of Powerbirds as of now. Unfortunately, as it stands right now, your draft is more likely than not to declined. Let me go over the main reason why it might not go through: You still haven’t added sources for the episode air dates, which is very important. Try to find a reliable, secondary source for these air dates, as well as a source for the production codes. Also, please respond to messages that other editors send you, as they may also be able to help you. And please don’t rush the process, we are not a TV Guide. ShadowCyclone talk 15:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:AnimationEpic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:AnimationEpic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. kingboyk (talk) 18:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ChiveTV

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ChiveTV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your recent edit at Corn & Peg

Please consider undoing your recent edit about Russell Marcus. Read what it says at Talk:Corn & Peg about the usage of pressreader.com to verify this claim. There is a risk that you will be blocked for disruptive editing. There has been a long campaign by IP socks to add Russell Marcus's name to the article. Now you are here to make the same change. This can't be confirmed by what Wikipedia considers to be WP:Reliable sources. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yadirf (Disney Channel)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Yadirf (Disney Channel), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... discospinster _talk 20:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Yadirf (Disney Channel) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yadirf (Disney Channel), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Luo Bao Bei

Hi, I tagged something you wrote in Luo Bao Bei as seemingly contradictory about Mao Mao. Please make the text clearer, or remove it. Hope this helps! – Fayenatic London 10:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Q*bert Rebooted

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Q*bert Rebooted".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Monkey See, Monkey Do (TV series)

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monkey See, Monkey Do".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Claude (TV series)

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Claude".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Belles (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Belles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Belles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mighty Mike

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mighty Mike".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moon and Me

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moon and Me".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kidoodle

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kidoodle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:ChiveTV concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ChiveTV, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ChiveTV

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ChiveTV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Monkey See, Monkey Do (TV series)

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monkey See, Monkey Do".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:EvanTubeHD

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EvanTubeHD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Claude (TV series)

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Claude".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

My issues

I would like to apologize to all the Wikipedians from my past behavior and rudeness, I was always misunderstood and very immature, and too sensitive about my edits, looking back at them, I was deeply disappointed in myself for my past self, been very rude, and always immutare, getting mad every time a “good edit” of mine gets reverted and i revert back and it’s reverted again and I get a warning and that stuff, but I become more understood now and I changed a bit, but my problem still stands. i have mental issues that I always get angry at not a big deal things, i’m still changing from that. again, i apologize to all the Wikipedians I beefed with, i have changed a bit now, but I rarely edit on Wikipedia anymore, i just wanted to write this to everyone. Hope you guys can forgive me. HappyINC (💬) 07:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mickey Mornings

Hello, HappyINC. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mickey Mornings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yadirf (Disney Channel)

Hello, HappyINC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yadirf (Disney Channel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Belles

Hello, HappyINC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Belles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BabyRiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BabyRiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zai ^{(💬 • 📝 • ⚡️)} 21:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

March 2022

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Astroblast!. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:First Media (company)

Hello, HappyINC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Media (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Untitled Harold and the Purple Crayon film for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untitled Harold and the Purple Crayon film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Harold and the Purple Crayon film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 16:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Disney's Magic Bake-Off

Hello, HappyINC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disney's Magic Bake-Off, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:First Media (company)

Hello, HappyINC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Inanimate Insanity

Draft:Inanimate Insanity, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Inanimate Insanity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Inanimate Insanity during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Zerbu ^💬 00:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Inanimate Insanity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Inanimate Insanity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[All the discussions listed at WP:BFDI]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)