User talk:Hannaniakollor/sandbox

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Hannaniakollor
  • Good job on adding the specialty of cementoma.
  • I noticed on the wiki page if there was no information regarding a section, you leave asterisks, it would be a good idea to explain that there is no further research because the reader can be confused.
  • Add information on how cementoma can be prevented.
  • No mechanism section, add so there’s more emphasis on how it affects the body.

Aichakay26 (talk) 20:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • explained sections where not enough info could be provided
  • Cementomas have no known cause/primary care to prevent them
  • Added a pathophysiology section with a few details

Hannaniakollor (talk) 02:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • I think you are headed in the right direction with this disorder, and I think you are using very concise terminology.
  • I would use links to more uncommon terminology if there is already a wiki page on it, or another source, in order to better explain some of the related words.
  • Don't forget to add footnotes and to cite any sources that you may have used.
  • In your "types" section, although it is not your main focus, I would write a few words explaining what each type is and what makes them different from eachother since your oringal topic seems very broad.
  • Since you don't have a mechanism, I would suggest looking into one of the specific types you mentioned, maybe there is something on that? Maybe something that you can use to relate to the overall idea?

--Anicolaie (talk) 00:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Andreea Nicolaie 11/13/2020Reply

  • added hyperlinks to uncommon terms
  • Inserted footnotes for references
  • not sure if I will expand on types since little information could be found on 3/4 subtypes
  • mechanism is not well understood for all types, I did add more details and piece info from a case study for the mechanism.

Hannaniakollor (talk) 02:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • All sections need thorough, in-text citations.
  • Link any term that is important or uncommon to its own wikipedia article the first time it shows up.
  • Obviously, you need to fill in the empty sections.
  • Right now, this is basically a sketch. You need to do a lot of work to fill this out and make it a complete article.
  • Cause: you might be able to get a little more under some of the specific subtypes.

--Sweiner02 (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


  • citations added
  • uncommon terms linked

Hannaniakollor (talk) 02:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply