HandleDePlume

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 02:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Are you the original creator of this page? What exactly is distruptive and what exactly is not backed up by reference? You (assuming you are the original creator) have listed references to 3 items accusing Danino of being Hindutva. But within the reference there is no evidence being presented of his Hindu Nationalist agenda. HandleDePlume (talk) 06:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Also, there were a couple of other items that was just bad English. Those I will correct again now. But, I will wait for your reply on the substantive issues. HandleDePlume (talk) 06:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Sinauli. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adakiko (talk) 08:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

What exactly is unsourced?? HandleDePlume (talk) 08:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

That edit is exactly correct. If you disagree with my edit, then kindly reveal the sources of other main stream scholars who agree with Parpola. I can not prove a negative. HandleDePlume (talk) 08:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at User talk:Aman.kumar.goel. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Doug Weller talk 08:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Kindly explain what was not in good faith. I said that it's inappropriate to revert change with no explanation besides "not needed" or "not important". Is this kind of behavior respect and civility? HandleDePlume (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

You are continuing to add unsourced material

and here[1] for some reason said that something that was in the bibliography wasn't. If this continues you will be blocked. Doug Weller talk 08:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

What unsourced material am I continuing to add? Regarding the note about the bibliography, that was my mistake, and I did thank the individual who reverted my change. HandleDePlume (talk) 08:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

“ No main-stream scholars to date have expressed support for Parpola's interpretation of the finds as evidence of early Aryan migrants using bull-drawn carts. ”

In addition, “Popularly associated” isn’t the same as “ by popular (i.e. non-academic) media,” Doug Weller talk 08:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Sinauli) for Continued adding of unsourced.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 08:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Can you clarify whether the limited block applies to the article talk page? S Philbrick(Talk) 17:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick it does not. But can't you see that? Doug Weller talk 17:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Probably, if I wasn't seriously under the weather, I could figure it out myself. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick As someone still recovering from my second cancer operation and wondering if I will have two more. I sympathise. When you feel bad it’s hard to cope. Doug Weller talk 19:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Thankfully, nothing as serious as cancer (knock on wood), just not thinking clearly, and coping with 2 young grandchildren (which is wonderful, but not good for clarity of thinking) S Philbrick(Talk) 19:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a battleground

You have been blocked for a week for persistent personal attacks combined with egregious misreadings of policy (notably of WP:3RR — or did you actually read it?) on Doug Weller's page. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 08:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC).