Hal Kennedoddy
Welcome edit
|
| This is Hal Kennedoddy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Mein has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
KylieTastic (talk) 16:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)A note on how Wikipedia works edit
Hi, I see you have not only added claims to articles without citing any sources, but have reverted other editors who rightly objected to that with the edit comment that you knew a subject personally, and by implication did not need to provide any evidence. I'm afraid that's not allowed here. Using personal knowledge such as statements from people you know is at best hearsay, at worst Original Research, which is forbidden on Wikipedia. This is because other editors will be unable to verify any such claim: please take a look at the policy on Verifiability, which is central to how Wikipedia works. What we do is to make claims in an article only when these are based, indeed only when fully justified, by the text in Reliable Sources, cited directly in the article. I do hope this is clear as it is critical to all editing: everything you do here must be driven by the need to ensure that articles are verifiably accurate. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, now you've tried citing Wikipedia (Zeb Kyffin) in a reference (in Chiswick). The problem is, that Wikipedia is not itself a suitable source, as it cannot be assumed to be reliable. Why is that? Because it can be edited by anybody, and we don't know if "anybody" is well-informed, forgetful, boastful, commercially-minded, a propagandist, joking, or simply mad. So, we have to insist they are well-informed, by requiring them to cite suitable reliable sources which anyone else can verify, i.e. check that the sources exist and have been described and interpreted correctly. I do hope this is clear as it is the way the whole of Wikipedia works: if you can't do this, I'm afraid you can't edit.
- To sum up (and to repeat): you MUST cite reliable external sources, like a textbook, a national newspaper, the website of a major institution like a national museum, or a peer-reviewed academic research paper. This is ESSENTIAL. Many thanks for your time and for your understanding. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Alex Luhrs moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Alex Luhrs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 02:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Luhrs (December 24) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Luhrs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex Luhrs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Hal Kennedoddy!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 20:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Concern regarding Draft:Alex Luhrs edit
Hello, Hal Kennedoddy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alex Luhrs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Alex Luhrs edit
Hello, Hal Kennedoddy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex Luhrs".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 edit
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jeff Bezos. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jeff Bezos. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest edit
Hello, Hal Kennedoddy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Thomas Mein, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Heyo, I see you created Michael Gill (cyclist) good job. However this cyclist does not meet notability requirement according to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cycling/Consensus_decisions#Notability_guideline_update or Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Cycling. The rider does not also seem notable when I googled looking for sources. All his wins are at amateur level. I found maybe some info about his track results where he placed 2nd or 1st in U23 but nothing that would prove he is notable. In order for the page to remain you should try to find something notable about him. Cheers Paulpat99 (talk) 23:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Minor edits edit
Howdy, thanks for your editing at Thomas Mein. However, some of these edits do not constitute a minor edit so you should not mark it as one. I see you have marked most of your edits as minor edits, please see this Help:Minor_edit#What_to_mark_as_minor_changes for what to mark as a minor edit. Also a friendly reminder to use edit summaries. Paulpat99 (talk) 01:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Lewis Elsdon, 1st Duke of Muggleswick edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Lewis Elsdon, 1st Duke of Muggleswick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Lewis Elsdon, 1st Duke of Muggleswick edit
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Lewis Elsdon, 1st Duke of Muggleswick, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VickKiang (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022 edit
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 21:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to John Spence Community High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 07:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Paulpat99 (talk) 01:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Josh Charlton moved to draftspace edit
Unfortunately, an article you recently created Josh Charlton, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
! Header cell !! Header cell |- | Content cell || Content cell
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Charlton (January 31) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josh Charlton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Concern regarding Draft:Josh Charlton edit
Hello, Hal Kennedoddy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josh Charlton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
November 2023 edit
Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Spence Community High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 07:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Richy Mitch & The Coal Miners moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Richy Mitch & The Coal Miners, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)