You have removed the section of Allegations of Royal Massacre without any references. This must be undone. Allegations are not proven; first people are charged, and they are tried--which is called the due process of law. Hence, an allegation must exist in the page of a person. A news that involves a critical matter which involved a worldwide attention cannot be ignored. People have the right to know these information--which is Wiki's mission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hailbihar (talk • contribs) 18:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You are right allegations are not proven, however Wikipedia is supposed to be a credible encyclopedia. The article you source is from daily people's VIEW, and in a section called "viewpoint", if every article from blogs were posted on an encyclopedia it would lose its credibility as an encyclopedia. Therefore, in this article, which is hardly a page long, it doesn't seem appropriate to include a section called "Royal Massacre Allegations." I will not undo your change however if you have any sources aside of those two references you provided which were by the same author I would no problems reading it. Sharmaru (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
FYI: I had posted an entry in the No original research noticeboard questioning your justifications, if you like to further defend your arguments. Sharmaru (talk) 03:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- The sources you give for this content come from a newspaper that allows readers to submit their own articles and an op-ed piece. Both grossly fail our reliable sources guideline, which means they are absolutely unacceptable sources of contentious information about living persons (please see the biographies of living persons policy). Continued addition of this material without high quality sources will result in your being blocked from editing. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Girija Prasad Koirala. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)