Rodoljupci moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Rodoljupci. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Azarctic (talk) 00:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Haqiqatjou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:The 100 most prominent Serbs according to a committee of academicians at the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

2024 Austrian legislative election

edit

Hello. I don't understand why you only added swings to the results table for five of the twelve parties. Could you add the remaining seven so the rest of the column is not empty? Thanks, Number 57 19:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

hi. I didnt have time. I added the rest Hadjnix 13:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm AkiyamaKana. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Islam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AkiyamaKana (talk) 13:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strahinja Janjić (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hadjnix! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User report to personal talk page. Thank you.CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Islam) for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is a false warning and it has been made to scare me. I've tested that I am still able to edit on Wikipedia. Hadjnix 12:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure you can. Even Talk:Islam. But not Islam. Doug Weller talk 16:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Birthdate incorrect on Dennis Assanis?

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Assanis Born 1967 and BA 1980, MAs in 1982, PhD in 1985? Would have been 13, 15 and 18 years old respectively. This is the date that has been in the entry since 2016, but it can't be right. BD comes up on aggregator sites as Feb 1959. 108.52.214.85 (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright. I appreciate that you’ve found errors in the article. However, I did not put that birth date. You can freely correct the birth date if you want. Hadjnix 20:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I/P restriction notification

edit

Since it is not clear whether you have been made aware of this:

Your unilateral addition to Kamala Harris/FAQ—which you should not have made without consensus or any prior discussion regardless—is clearly a violation of the I/P extended confirmed restriction as such. Please be aware of this going forward. Remsense ‥  06:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prior accounts

edit

Hi Hadjnix. Could you confirm if you have any relation to User:Fournineo, User:Some random serbian, or User:Aca1291? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Hadjnix 12:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
You should appeal your block as Aca1291, they apply to the editor not the account. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don’t have issues with being blocked from editing Islam but ok. Hadjnix 13:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
You misunderstand as long as the Aca1291 account is blocked you should not be editing at all. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 13:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, that's not true. Hadjnix 14:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are incorrect. What you are doing is WP:SOCK. I have blocked this account. Please log in to your original account to appeal. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
My older accounts are inactive, I don't have access to them anymore which is why I made this one. Hadjnix 15:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your older account is blocked. You should not have made this account at all. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I made it at Serbian Wikipedia, and forgot about Aca1291 being blocked on English Wikipedia until now. Hadjnix 17:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

November 2024

edit
 
This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Hadjnix (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It ain’t a sockpuppet because the intention of this account wasn’t to break the rules of Wikipedia but because I lost access to my older accounts so I made this one instead.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It ain’t a sockpuppet because the intention of this account wasn’t to break the rules of Wikipedia but because I lost access to my older accounts so I made this one instead. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It ain’t a sockpuppet because the intention of this account wasn’t to break the rules of Wikipedia but because I lost access to my older accounts so I made this one instead. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It ain’t a sockpuppet because the intention of this account wasn’t to break the rules of Wikipedia but because I lost access to my older accounts so I made this one instead. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hadjnix 15:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply