User talk:HMSSolent/Archive 10
David Mark (Scientist)
editMy entry on David Mark (Scientist) was not accepted because it supposedly reads like an advertisement. I agree that the entry only talks about positive achievements, but he is indeed a legend in the academic field of GIScience, which is easily verifiable from his awards and his status as SUNY Distinguished Professor. Every statement is verifiable from another resource or websites, it's not a personal opinion. A lot of the information on his professional achievements was already published prior in a book (Handbook of Geography). I could take out the interest and hobbies section if it makes it too personal. But everything else is quite easily verified. The page was created to honor his retirement and celebrate his achievements, so of course it reads positive. But it still is factually correct 100%. There is nothing in there that is mere opinion and it's not that it's lifted from his webpage or his CV only. Enlighten me please what would it take to get this accepted. Lomdii (talk) 03:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)lomdii
Confraternities in Nigeria
editSome information I reverted from the topic Confraternities_in_Nigeria was illegally downloaded and doctored by the user assopre. he has previously attempted to edit the following pages Neo_Black_Movement_of_Africa and Nigerian_organized_crime with the exact same information. He is waging a vendetta against the organisation following his dismissal. The references he has included do not reflect the data he has posted. The data he has posted are doctored, factually incorrect, uncited and generally of little of no public value. he has posted the entire constitution of the organisation amongst other sundry information of no public value. Yoweri7 (talk) 08:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi new to this so hope this isn't in the wrong page/ place. You've removed the information I posted for this topic. I have previously undertaken extensive research on this topic. However I no longer have access to the research as I don't live at home. This information is extremely important part of the story as it shows there was a correct forecast available only through a lack of communication, time alignment and technology this information was not present for most of the crews when they made their decision. I currently don't have the time to go and repeat the research which was carried out to back this up but if someone else does then that would be great. otherwise I will do it at some point in the future when i'm not as busy. Murrisk12 (talk) 12:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Fastnet Disaster 1979 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murrisk12 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
J. R. Rix & Sons Ltd
editHi, I wrote the above article as an enthusiast of the company and it has been refused as it reads too much like an advert. I've amended it in a way which I thought took out anything that could be misconstrued as an advert and resubmitted, but it has been refused a second time. I was hoping you might be able to advise me on why, and what I needed to do to have it accepted. I feel it is worthy of a entry as the company has a long and interesting history, of which it is very proud. Thanks and kind regards Gerald — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerald Prosser (talk • contribs) 09:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done Your submission is rated C-class on the project quality scale. hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 14:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
yes you made a mistake
editRead the edit before simply undoing it. StoryEpic (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- That edit has been reverted by another editor, to which didn't appear to be constructive. If you think that the edit was justified in anyway, please discuss with the editor reverting. hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 01:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
editThank you for the support. (Johnny B(Song))Sapountzakis (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
edit- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
Well-being and Nurungji
editYou reverted my edit to the nurungji page in which I inserted a "sic" after the term well-being. The term was being used ERRONEOUSLY as an adjective (as it is often used in Korea). But any fucking moron knows it is a noun. You snooty shit.
- What "ruins the community" is incompetent "editors" (sic) reverting valid edits and wasting my motherfucking time. As you were warned 3 days ago by StoryEpic "Read the edit before simply undoing it."
- Am I allowed to call it my "motherfucking" time? That's not a personal attack, is it? That won't offend you, will it? How about implying that you are incompetent? Is that ok? Or is that an attack, too? When does legitimate criticism become an "attack"? Is it when YOU are the one being criticized? Thought as much.
- If you continue to assume bad faith and use profanity, rest assured, you will be blocked. Consider yourself warned; I may be required to report you to AN/I if you refuse to resolve the issue calmly. Calling some one a "snooty shit" or a "fucking moron" is a personal attack. See WP:NPA. hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 01:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
editNo te entiendo, hablame en espanol por favor!--Bogdan29roman (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
English: I've told him that he will be more successful on the Spanish Wikipedia. Hopefully he'll take it to mind and work over there where he'll have more success.
Espanol: Le he dicho que va a tener más éxito en la Wikipedia en español. Esperemos que lo llevo a la mente y trabajar allá donde va a tener más éxito.
MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) - (Cakes) 09:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Solent, the PROD you placed on Tesses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was contested so I took the article to AFD. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear HMSSolent
editIt would rot help me with these translations. Thank. --Luisvil12 (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear HMSSolent
editLuis Manuel Molina. Thank. --Luisvil12 (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the correction on Concow California. I am a history teacher and I changed and edited it to show my students how wikipedia works. I am going to change it again since I have another class, feel free to change it back at 2:45 PM Eastern. Thank you for your message.
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
edit- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
edit- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Keith Bell Davis
editWhat is wrong with my references? They are from new papers and reputable publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by BryFi (talk • contribs) 05:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Submission
editI have an article here for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Antavious_Wilson 71.180.91.32 (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Another Submission
editI have this other other article here for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Chris_Pantale 71.180.91.32 (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Submission
editI got a article here for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/K.J._Stroud 71.180.91.32 (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)