July 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Legal system of the United Arab Emirates—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. SunDawntalk 11:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Hassan Elhais (July 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 17:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, HElhais321! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 17:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Hassan Elhais

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Hassan Elhais, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 14:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HElhais321 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Kindly request you to please unblock my editing permission. I understand that it is being blocked due to promotional content but the articles that I had linked was informational rather than promotional. I have understood the Wikipedia guidelines now and ensure that I won't be linking and promotional content. I am new to Wikipedia and ask you to please revoke the indefinite block to the account. HElhais321 (talk) 16:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your edits were clearly promotional. Please reread WP:COI and WP:PROMO. You'll also need to tell us what you plan to write about instead, if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 16:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HElhais321 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I now understand the reason behind the block. If my account is unblocked, I ensure that I won't be linking any promotional content and strictly adhere to the Wikipedia guidelines. I am getting hold of the guidelines and learning the do's and don't when editing an Wikipedia article. I have knowledge regarding Legal System and Laws, so I would be contributing to this topic(strictly non-promotional). Therefore, I humbly request you to unblock my account at the earliest.

Decline reason:

That seems to fall within your conflict of interest, so I don't think you'll be unblocked to edit at this time in that area. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HElhais321 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Kindly request you to unblock the editing permission for this account. I now understand the Wikipedia guidelines better and would like adhere to the guideline hereafter. Also, I ensure that I won't be publishing any promotional content for any kind of topics that I would like to contribute. Making myself clear that I won't be contributing to any law or legal topic.

Decline reason:

You're not addressing the issue of sockpuppetry noted above. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock puppet

edit

Noting UTRS appeal #46770 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply