HARRYMAGIC

Kindly guide me that in my contributed articles it is coming Hidden Category - Articles with hcard, I have tried by edits and checked several times the information posted by me, but there is now NO error in articles or any insignificant thing, Kindly guide me regarding the matter of Article with hcard.

It will be highly appreciated, Thanks HARRYMAGIC (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't quite understand your question; to which article are you referring? And what do you mean in your contributed articles? Please replace the helpme tag once you have rephrased your question. Thanks. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Regarding my arctiles I posted in contains relevant information and I would like to post Semi Edit Lock in the articles, as now according to me I have checked the articles many times and editted the errors, now all information there is Relevant. Please guide me in this matter also.HARRYMAGIC (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Semi protection is used to prevent vandalism from IP addresses and non-autoconfirmed editors on pages where such vandalism has taken place, or to encourage discussion where there is an edit war occuring. You can request semiprotection at WP:RFPP, but bear in mind that it's probably not appropriate unless the article is being vandalised or there is an edit war going on. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

HARRYMAGIC (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

HARRYMAGIC (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Harsh Vardhan Jain

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Harsh Vardhan Jain, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: HV JAIN. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Harsh Vardhan Jain

Redirect of HV Jain to Harsh Vardhan Jain, as full name is better in Articles, Kindly see in the matter please. ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 19:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I appreciate that you have tried to improve the Harsh Vardhan Jain but there are still many errors in the use of English. Practically every sentence has an error in it, and some of the sentences that you have "corrected" are still wrong. Until such time as you or someone else can correct these, the tag should remain. Deb (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Article HVJ

It will be higly appreciated if you contribute little from your vast knowledge, if you have little time. Kindly help in solving the problem and please give some guidence, thanks. HARRYMAGIC (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Article Improvement - Jagmandar Dass Jain

Kindly see that User : Ground Zero, has done the corrections for improvement of the Article, Regards HARRYMAGIC (talk) 09:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

This is not true. The article is still in extremely poor English, so much so that in places it is difficult to tell what it is supposed to be about. Articles should be written in correct English when they are first created, and you should not expect other contributors to clean them up for you. I recommend that you approach someone you know who speaks English as their first language, and ask them to point out the errors so that you will understand them. Otherwise you may continue to create articles that need extensive cleanup.

I also recommend that you read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and ensure that you are complying with this guideline.

Deb (talk) 11:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Articles

Actually is not that expecting someone to clean the articles, only the main point was it was requested you to give some guidance in the article Jagmandar Dass Jain and the user:Ground Zero did some corrections in English and it was understood that the user helped in corrections.

As per your guidelines now cleaning up will be done accordingly in perfect English.

As in matter of dispute, it was never intended to dispute with anyone and in future also no disputes, only a guidance was asked as it is provided.

ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 12:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

You have not quite got the idea yet. You cannot use wikipedia articles as references within a wikipedia article. The references quoted must be independent third-party references and they must support the statements you make, not just relate vaguely to them. You should not include the subject's personal website or promotional material among references either. Deb (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Final Artcle after all corrections Harsh Vardhan Jain

Finally all corrections are been done, without your guidance it would not be possible. RegardsHARRYMAGIC (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanking You

Thanks for your regular guidance, how to thank you ? As you have been like a helping hand in guiding and teaching new comers so that they can to follow your steps to contribute in here for good & great articles. Once again thanking you for your support.HARRYMAGIC (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Jain Rolling Mills

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Jain Rolling Mills has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Article is been redirected, it will be highly appreciated if you kindly reconsider the article changes.HARRYMAGIC (talk) 12:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

The redirect is fine. Please be aware of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, in that you seem to be here only to write about yourself, your family, and your family's companies. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Once please contact USER:DEB as earlier Article was not deleted, kindly clear the confusion please. ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 13:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Request for Article Harsh Vardhan Jain

Article has been deleted kindly see in the matter, as earler all the issues regarding Wikipedia:Conflict of interest were solved. Kindly see in the matter regarding the Article and it will be highly appreciated if you kindly solve the problem, as the article was created long time back. RegardsHARRYMAGIC (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Jagmandar Dass Jain for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Jagmandar Dass Jain, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagmandar Dass Jain until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -Addionne (talk) 18:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Article - Jagmandar Dass Jain

Kindly see the Articles in Category:Indian businesspeople may be more than 80% will be deleted due to one or other reasons.

Kindly see the corrections been done in the Articles contributed Harsh Vardhan Jain, Jagmandar Dass Jain etc.

The reason is not known but after 2 mths of Article been posted in Wikipedia, May be due to Contribution by Indians in Wikipedia is not been liked by you, so best of luck.

ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 19:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Jain Rolling Mills listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jain Rolling Mills. Since you had some involvement with the Jain Rolling Mills redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

No One asked for it. ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

AfDs and racism accusations

Hello, HARRYMAGIC. You have new messages at Addionne's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No I dont want to report or dispute with anyone or Administrator.

Only request I made was that there was a confusion today morning by User:NawlinWiki and then others followed it too. I want to express is that approx 4500 view for the Articles and if there was any incorrect information then it would have been come in notice long back.

Explaination of Confusion where User:Nawlinwiki expressed that Article was Deleted earlier :

17:42, October 19, 2010 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Harsh Vardhan Jain" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))

01:12, October 4, 2010 Deb (talk | contribs) deleted "Harsh Vardhan Jain" ‎ (G6: Deleted to make way for move)

But, as on 4 Oct 2010 it was a redirect done by User:Deb, No deletion was done. For further confirmation kindly contact User:Deb.

ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Offer of help

I'm quite certain that your creation of the articles mentioned above is a complex hoax, but if you ever find some sources that meet the requirements at WP:RS I will help you create the articles. Bigger digger (talk) 11:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I will contact the people from Jain Group and will certainly collect more material from them regarding the authenticity of data. Thanks for your support. Regards HARRYMAGIC (talk) 10:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at Bigger digger's talk page.

There is no need to start a new section for each part of the conversation, just edit the section of the conversation. See WP:TPG for more useful information. Bigger digger (talk) 13:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

::Ping! Bigger digger (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Kindly consider once without any Predudice. Article Harsh Vardhan Jain & Jagmandar Dass Jain It is only for explanation that the Article is NOT HOAX or It is Never Ever deliberatity attempted to deceive or trick people into believing or accepting something which is false. If the Articles get deleted no problem, but only request is kindly dont call it as Haux. Verification - Kindly see that person widely known as JD JAIN & HV JAIN 1) VISIT : www.hvjain.com 2) VISIT : www.jaingroupofcompanies.com 3) Visit in person RSA, in London, England. 4) Visit Consul.cc in Vegas, US 5) Visit BBC - 5 Live Investigations in London, England 6) Visit All India Jain Conference, New Delhi, India. 7) Visit The Times of India, Leading News in India. 8) Visit city of Ghaziabad, UP, India 9) Visit Leicester House of Commons, England. 10) Visit 'Udhyog Patra' Self Made Industrialist - year 1975 ( Details of year 1975 Functions attended, present in Office of Vice President of India ) As it was and will in future never attempted to provide any false information, may be the format is not accordingly but the contents are correct. If required FAX or Email ( Scanned Data's ) can be sent for clarification of the contents. Sorry if something wrong is written. Thanks HARRYMAGIC (talk) 13:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 17:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As  Confirmed by CheckUser. –MuZemike 17:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HARRYMAGIC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Reason Stated : That the users you have mentioned may be in a same block of building, but there is a large Wireless Server who provides usage of Internet to the all Staff, Visitors, Residents and others who are in the wireless range of the eqipment, thus the IP address of the server is displayed similar if for example 100's of users are using same server, Kindly consider to unblock. It is been too metioned that till date No harmful or any incorrect information is contributed, Regards

Decline reason:

The entire article you're sadly working to save is about the subject of that other userid. I'm certain that person exists, but promulgating hoaxes by trying to make said person look more important than they are in the grand scheme of things is worthy of a block for disruption on its own. Evidence is too clear: you're a sock. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HARRYMAGIC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is never attempted to provide any false information to wikipedia, may be the format is not accordingly but the contents are correct. If required FAX or Email ( Scanned Data's ) can be sent for clarification of the contents. ThanksHARRYMAGIC (talk) 06:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See Giftiger wunsch's message below. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Sandstein  10:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment: if you do not address the reason for blocking, your unblock request will almost certainly be declined. You weren't blocked for hoaxes, you were blocked because you are a sockpuppet of another user, confirmed by checkuser. Unless you have a very good explanation for why checkuser is incorrect in this case, you should simply accept the block, log in to your primary account, and agree not to use sockpuppets again in future. Depending on why you were blocked on your main account, you may be unblocked if you agree to stop socking and accept why you were blocked in the first place, or you may be given the standard offer. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 08:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HARRYMAGIC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It was, is or will Never in future to provide any incorrect information. It was a try to provide the dats of some persons who are very popular in the region. As regarding the references provided - earlier in 1960's & 70's media was not developed in the region that is why there were some references missing. But once see that in the region there are very very few interent faciliies, that is why maximum people use same wireless router and in concern regarding the sock, people in my region are trying to learn using wikipedia and may be I am many times helping them, so it can be possible that datas match, I can only request you to kindly please once see & review the articles also which were deleted by User:Naulinwiki

Decline reason:

Failure to address the sockpuppetry allegations. If you want to continue, you'll have to do this by email as I have had enough of you wasting administrative time by avoiding the issue of what you were blocked for. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RegardsHARRYMAGIC (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)