Gustavocive

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gloria James-Civetta (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Gloria James-Civetta may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

We have resubmitted the content after thoroughly checking the content and Plagiarism and we found 0 content matching. If you still find the content to be not suitable, kindly let us know which part is a problem. Gustavocive (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Gustavocive! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gloria James-Civetta (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gloria James-Civetta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello Gustavocive. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Gloria James-Civetta, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gustavocive. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gustavocive|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I, Gustavo Pedro Civetta, am the Co-Founder of the company along with my Wife Ms Gloria James. No body else has this information to be able to verify her credentials other than me. This is 100% not a paid promotional content, it is merely based on fact. This information can only be confirmed by us, we have never had any complaints.

I hope this reply satisfies your requirement. Please let me know if there is anything else you require from me.

Regards

Gus Gustavocive (talk) 10:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

@Gustavocive: based on the confirmation you've provided above, you have a financial interest in the firm and therefore must make the declaration described above before you edit the draft further. If the statements you make in the article cannot be verified by readers checking the information in other published sources then they are not suitable for inclusion and must be removed. See WP:V and WP:PUBLISH. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

This page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Shane_Todd clearly talks about Ms Gloria James and here involvement in the case. The information we have provided is available in the following links.

We believe that we have provided the proof of the information. You can check the below links

- https://www.gjclaw.com.sg/about-us/our-staff/gloria-james-civetta/

- https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/shane-todds-death-agc-denies-towel-and-noose-destroyed-to-block-dna-test

- https://doylesguide.com/leading-family-divorce-law-firms-singapore-2022/

- https://www.singaporedivorcelawyer.com.sg/gloria-james-civetta

BR

GUS Gustavocive (talk) 12:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

If I may interject, there are three major issues here that need to be sorted out:

1. You clearly have a conflict of interest, based on what you've said above, and for that reason you must make a formal COI disclosure. I will post another message below with instructions on how to do this, and what it means in terms of your editing of this draft/article.
2. The content of the draft must be supported throughout by reliable published sources; it is not enough to say that you know these things to be true. As this is an article on a living person, every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal and family details and the like must be clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources, or else removed (see WP:BLP). Currently the draft is almost entirely unreferenced, with only two citations.
3. The person in question must be shown to be notable by Wikipedia standards. Per the general notability guide WP:GNG, this requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. The draft currently cites only two sources, of which one is not fully independent, and the other doesn't provide significant coverage.

Hope this helps, but if I can further elaborate on anything, please let me know. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

We understand what you are saying. In order to be fully independent, can you suggest someone who can research and do this article for us. We will pay for it. I think this is the only way forward. They can then possibly contact Law Society of Singapore, Harvard Law School, Oxford Law School for Verification. How does this sound, can you help us out? Gustavocive (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

With respect, outsourcing the writing to a third party will only get you around the first of the issues I've enumerated above. Points two and three will remain, and need to be resolved somehow regardless of who is writing the article.

I would also advise against engaging a paid editor, as that may only make the situation worse, in more ways than one. In any case, I'm the worst person to ask about this, as I'm on record objecting to the whole concept of paid editing.

I also now realise I forgot earlier to post the promised COI message here, so will do that now. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your guidance anonymous; we just wait for someone to take 4 hours and write something out of the blue. Gustavocive (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gloria James-Civetta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gloria James-Civetta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Gustavocive. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Gloria James-Civetta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)