Welcome!

edit
Hello, Gumberoo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Goatmen

edit

Hallo, I've seen your moves around Goatman and I'm sorry but I've undone a lot of your work. There are a couple of things which you seem to have misunderstood about editing Wikipedia:

  1. A disambiguation page can be at the "base title", and in fact it should be there unless there is an agreed "Primary Topic", which is defined at WP:PTOPIC as "if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term.". I don't see evidence that the Maryland creature meets that definition. There's a second criterion for Primary Topic: "if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term", which would possibly qualify Faun. So the disambiguation page was at the right title, and the Maryland creature was at the right title.
  2. To move an existing article from one title to another, you must not just cut and paste the content. That loses the editing history, the record of the contributions made by previous editors - in this case over 10 years of edits. There is a WP:Requested Moves process. That's the process I'm now using to get the status quo reinstated. In some cases it is permissible to copy text from one article to another, but only with great care to leave a trail of attribution so that there is a permanent record of who wrote what - see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it's an interesting journey. Please go back to the Goatman (Maryland) article and improve it, add new sources, etc - but without wiping out the history of work by many previous editors. Thanks. PamD 08:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goatman (urban legend), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lumberwoods for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lumberwoods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumberwoods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

hinnk (talk) 00:48, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Regarding this edit

edit

edit. Anyone can redirect an article, that isn't actually deleting it. You are also allowed to revert that redirection. It is called Bold, Revert, Discuss. But it will most definitely be going to AfD, and if Hinnks doesn't, then I will, unless you can find some substantial, independent coverage in reliable sources. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lenwood S. Sharpe for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lenwood S. Sharpe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenwood S. Sharpe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

hinnk (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Lenwood S. Sharpe. Thank you. hinnk (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Lumberwoodslogo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Lumberwoodslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Tripodero per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tripodero. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply