Please Vote edit

I invite you to vote here for whether or not Ralph Nader should be included in the info-box, @Guiletheme:. Yuri Alexeyevich Gagarin (talk) 22:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Guiletheme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 06:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Skamecrazy123. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Redskins Rule, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Skamecrazy123 (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Redskins Rule with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Usb10 plug me in 22:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Guiletheme. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Redskins Rule. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Redskins Rule. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 22:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Guiletheme. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Guiletheme. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Purple Barnstar
Despite being accused of vandalism multiple times to get a final warning before AIV, you stayed true and dug up a citation to shoo them away. "The Purple Barnstar" is awarded to individuals that had to endure incessant harrassment on Wikipedia and still stayed true to the site. Keep editing! We're glad to have you here. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

A massive apology is owed edit

I owe you one heck of an apology. I didn't twig onto what your page was about until somebody else told me what the page was about. I am truly sorry for the vandalism accusations and I will be more careful in future. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tim Donnelly (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Education (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the updates to the Maxwell_(musician) article edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits to the Maxwell_(musician) article. Unfortunately the 2 articles that you have linked to have cited Wikipedia for their information. These articles will be corrected via their original authors and when they are I'll be returning the article to the state with the correct information. It is most appreciated that you have found these links so we can make sure that Wikipedia has the correct information for him.

Previous edits have been referred to as potential vandalism due to repeated, unattributed attempts by unregistered parties to change the name at a variety of locations within the article. There were no legal threats made at any point. And for the Conflict_of_interest you mention, quoting the referenced article itself "When advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest.", the interest here is only to get correct information about the artist to the world. That includes his name. By correcting wikipedia we are furthering it's reputation as a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopedia with correct information. I'm glad that we have the same goals for both Wikipedia and the Maxwell_(musician) article.

Thanks again for your constructive edits!Lemieux66 (talk) 23:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I cannot find any evidence saying that those articles cited Wikipedia or where they got their evidence from, but those are legitimate news sources. While I'm neutral towards Maxwell in general, it was somewhat acknowledged that Gerald Maxwell Rivera was his real name since his management has already deleted it from his page citing his desire not to reveal his name, even though Wikipedia is not censored. Also, well-meaning editors can have a Conflict of interest especially since "Any external relationship – personal, religious, political, academic, financial, and legal – can trigger a conflict of interest." My goals are Wikipedia's goals, to put out verifiable and well-sourced information about people and topics whether they like it or not. That's journalism and that's writing an encyclopedia. I hope those are yours as well.--Guiletheme (talk) 02:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please note that the only links that are being removed are sources which do not contain this incorrect name. The New Yorker link you referenced does not currently reference this name as it is incorrect. If the name is found on a legitimate news website, it stays on the page. If you can't attribute it, it goes away. I'm neutral to Maxwell as well but this is just how Wikipedia works. That's why references are needed in the first place, especially with information that is contested. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of verifiable facts, not a place for "somewhat acknowledged" and entirely incorrect information. Lemieux66 (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nobuhiko Kawamoto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honda Odyssey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ford Focus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Escort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honda Pilot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honda Odyssey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honda Odyssey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Owning the article edit

I made only small revisions on the Iglesia Ni Cristo article. I only corrected some wrong information. Please do not revert the edits. Thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.156.156 (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have to revert the edits if they contain puffery or unsourced material. Please adhere to all Wikipedia policies regarding that, sir.--Guiletheme (talk) 18:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disruption at Iglesia ni Cristo edit

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathematician 11 for the first in a grand series of reports I plan to make about this chronically problematic article. Thanks for your help in editing it. Elizium23 (talk) 04:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chevrolet Aveo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lyon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gardena, California edit

Hey friend, no offense really. I just like to get the info right. You added that Paul Tanaka is a member of the "Republican Party (United States)", yet the source you cited refers to a state election. In the article you cited, it states that Tanaka is supporting republican "Nathan Mintz" for "California's 66th State Assembly district". On that wiki article--California's 66th State Assembly district--it lists Mintz as a member of the California Republican Party. So, does Tanaka represent the California Republican Party or the Federal Republican Party? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mary Barra edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dizzy Gillespie may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • /web.archive.org/web/20071214053331/http://www.unbf.ca/clubs/abs/dizzy.htm | archivedate = Dec 2007}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Warsaw New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tim Solso edit

 

The article Tim Solso has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Firestone and Ford tire controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firestone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Jay Obernolte edit

Greetings Guiletheme,

Thanks for your recent edits to the Jay Obernolte page. I was just curious why you removed the category "Political candidates" with this edit from the page? Jay Obernolte is running for California's 33rd State Assembly district. I support the other categories you added because they improved the page and were much more specific. Let me know your thoughts and any other edits you would like to make to the page are much appreciated. Thanks! Meatsgains (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Frankie Sullivan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Frank Michael "Frankie" Sullivan III''' 1 February 1955, [[Chicago]]) is an [[United States|American]] [[guitarist]] and [[songwriter]]. He is best known for being a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Eldorado edit

Do you think you could find a notable source for your addition of D. Ruzzin as the designer of that Eldorado?842U (talk) 19:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maruchan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fujio Cho edit

I use the translation machinery. Source of information you have presented is clearly inaccurate. The first evidence is clear upon reading the Source of Japanese that have been presented to the talk page. The second evidence is remark when Cho has appeared on the program called 『World Business Satellite』 TV Tokyo. Cho has been described a Once suspected China or Korea hypothesis about their ancestors, it was argued that can not be assertive is. This claim is exactly the same as the Japanese source that has been presented to the talk page. The person who wrote the source you have presented does not surely understand Japanese.--Unkei6hokusai4 (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sigma Game Inc. edit

 

The article Sigma Game Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 19:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you! edit

  For expanding the article History of Asian Americans I present to you this Cheeseburger. May it fuel you in your continued edits to improve Wikipedia. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paul Chabot for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Chabot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Chabot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep 02:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 18 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Merkur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Fusion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uniform Tire Quality Grading, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trailer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ford EcoBoost engine
added a link pointing to Direct injection
Mazda L engine
added a link pointing to Direct injection

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016 edit

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Davey2010, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Someone who has been here for four years should know better than to make comments such as this -- samtar talk or stalk 10:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I made that comment. But tell me, was this any better or more productive?--Guiletheme (talk) 10:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Guiletheme: I agree, the editor could have phrased that a lot better and I completely understand that it got your back up. An uninvited word of advice? Keep cool, take note of the message behind the less-than-civil remarks and jump into editing something else. Biting back after being bitten only causes more trouble for everyone. Feel free to let me know if there's anything I can do to help -- samtar talk or stalk 11:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016 edit

Make that sort of comment again and I'll have you blocked quicker than you can blink, You may hate me for simply removing your additions on various car articles ..... fine I can live with that .... but I won't tolerate any personal attack against me!,
We're a collaborative project which means we all work together - If you're unable to work with anyone without holding childish grudges I would kindly suggest you find another hobby!,
Consider this a final warning. –Davey2010Talk 10:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

First off, I'm not scared of your threat of you trying to block me. If that happens, so be it. But let me say that while you want to blame this all on me, you are not innocent in this matter with remarks such as this. I don't know how you expect to get a constructive response telling people "source your shit or I'll revert it" and "If you have a problem with that then find another hobby." Before you tell people "we're a collaborative project which means we all work together," practice what you preach. If I get banned, fine. However, I will notify the administrators that your hands are not clean in this matter either which probably has higher stakes for you than it does for me.--Guiletheme (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nope I'm not trying to blame you whatsoever and I realize I've not been amazing myself, I admit I could've worded that much much better however saying stuff like "Dealing with bad faith editors" and "A simple Google search could have found sources, but some are more interested in making a point instead of good faith contributions" is going to rile me up, My reversions were in completely good faith and I even said "rm designed as unsourced & isn't mentioned anywhere in the article" - Alls you needed to have done is come back with a source and that would've been it but instead you readded back with a snarky edit suammry so I left one back,
I don't mean this in a funny way but if any editor adds a name, claim, whatever they need to provde a source - You can't expect editors to go around sourcing after you,
But anyway I sincerely apologize if I've upset or offended you with that comment - Believe it or not It's never my intention to upset or piss off anyone but anyway I apologize for making those comments, –Davey2010Talk 12:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
In my opinion content creators are the most valuable asset we have on Wikipedia. As such, I think every facet should be utilized to make them (content creators) as comfortable as possible on Wikipedia. I identify Guiletheme as a content creator. The more constructive manner in which Davey2010 could have dealt with Guiletheme was to rather than making a blanket wholesale revert, (a) see whether the content is easily verifiable; (b) possible tag it if unsure, or (c) to find a citation yourself. Pwolit iets (talk) 07:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Doves galore :) edit

)

To a new beginning!!!  , Anyway happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 13:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Guiletheme! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:34, Monday, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World car, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fuente enthusiasts edit

For what it's worth, there are a bunch of different accounts that have done nothing but make edits concerning Rocky De La Fuente, including Special:Contributions/Sammythesquirrel123, Special:Contributions/Pablo1291, Special:Contributions/Therealjot, and several IP addresses. Apart from the single-topic focus they don't seem to have an editing pattern in common, so I doubt this is one person with sock puppets. It's more likely that his campaign staff is encouraging their most engaged people to edit Wikipedia, which is annoying but not prohibited. You're free to think otherwise, of course, but it's probably best to just ignore them and not engage. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 03:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Guiletheme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good Work edit

I've noticed how you've made many productive contributions to Wikipedia in regards to background information on development of various brands and models. Thank you, as it's not easy to do it by yourself and you've unearthed information on many designers and engineers I have otherwise not succeeded. I very much empathize in the respect, how other editors are very quick to revert productive contributions such as your various research and often dismissive of design patent registrations. Please keep up the good work, despite how some uncooperative editors try to be obstructive.---Carmaker1 (talk) 21:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

2018 Toyota Camry (010B/XV60?) and Lexus LS (200B/XF50) edit

Cartiabiano, a longtime Toyota designer, was first known for his work on the second generation Avalon he designed in 2002-2003. The design for the new Camry (010B) was approved 18 months before its 2015 design freeze, which somehow points to an early 2014 design approval date. By late 2015, Japanese Kurumagt put out renderings of a silver Camry, which turned out to be extremely identical to the final design. I got ahold of these last (late) April and posted them on a forum to gain coverage, for Amer./EU/Africa/etc consumption in early May (despite public obsession with NS4 concept rendering). Do you think next to Ian Cartiabiano, that (2014) should be added? Development might've begun in 2012, from past research I've done on the car. Styling efforts for the updated XV50 was nearly complete by late 2012, which concluded entirely in 2013. Toyota spent more time on developing it, due to it being the first application of TNGA-K.

Now regarding the LS, I had been extremely certain that the design was finalized very early in 2014, as by October 2014, top Lexus UK personnel were shown the new LS in prototype form behind closed doors, despite it being on schedule for an early 2018 launch. The LF-FC was developed to somewhat preview the 2018 LS and be the basis of a range-topping fuel cell limousine due in 2020, which started at Tokyo's design centre in mid-2014 and sketching first presented done by September 5, 2014. For the time being, I was wondering it would be a good idea to add Kouichi Suga (2014) to the article? Thanks for your time.---Carmaker1 (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, and thank you for the compliment. Just see if you can use a Japanese car magazine as a source for all of this before someone else starts an unnecessary edit war. I also thank you for the wealth of contributions you have made, unfortunately, many editors love starting edit wars over anything that isn't written in stone and it's detrimental to Wikipedia.--Guiletheme (talk) 06:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
You're very welcome, as your hard work is excellent. Thank you, I appreciate that and I apologise for the late response. I will gladly provide you a Google Drive link, to a library of development information of various vehicles. Plus a few articles of past industry news. Seems that Japanese literature delves really deep into discussing development of various generations of Nissan, Mitsubishi, Mazda, Infiniti*, Lexus*, Acura, Toyota, Honda, Subaru and etc.--Carmaker1 (talk) 23:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of O'Keefe & Merritt edit

Hello Guiletheme,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged O'Keefe & Merritt for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Diako «  Talk » 07:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Guiletheme. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for Everything edit

Thanks for your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia. I think I may no longer be editing on Wikipedia (probably not of my own choice lol), so I am hoping you carry the torch for giving background info for R&D on various automobiles. That was my goal, but that has fallen flat and I am tired (lost patience with back & forth, little help). As someone that also has Asperger's, but has never let that hold me back, glad to see one of us here. Wish you well--Carmaker1 (talk) 04:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is a honeypot for folks with Asperger's and my time here made me realize I had the condition. I feel it is important to remember a high number of other editors are also on the spectrum as well, and as someone who works in the mental health world and with fellow autistic individuals as well, it's quite clear to see. The problem with Wikipedia is that everyone here has a personal agenda and I don't see how "not biting the newcomers" is more important than verifiable facts, are we an encyclopedia or a social network? I've been editing Wikipedia for 14 years now under different names, and it is what it is. If I have information to share, I'll share it, but it doesn't matter to me what a bunch of folks who spend too much time behind a keyboard think of me. There are many ways to contribute and share your knowledge and passion on the Internet, Wikipedia is just one of them. Starting a car website or blog might be a great idea, and if you do, please share. For those who care about facts and not social mores, Wikipedia was a better place because you were here.--Guiletheme (talk) 20:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
This is one of the best responses I have read in 11 years on this site. I have not highlighted that I have Asperger's in the ANI discussion there, but I have seen it as a gift, as in most cases it is. I think a website is probably the best idea. Wikipedia being referred to or copied and pasted globally, was one reason I came here. So that I wouldn't have to be going from forum to forum, infinite chat or comment sections, to spread the news myself tirelessly in place of inaccuracies. Thank you, as I am just tired and could've gone about things more civilly, to make a positive lasting impact.--Carmaker1 (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 8 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volkswagen Golf Mk4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autocar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Western Governors University edit

 

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know that I've started WikiProject Western Governors University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of WGU. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Paul Smith111977 (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

XT1095 listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect XT1095. Since you had some involvement with the XT1095 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 19:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Guiletheme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Japanese Patent Database Treasure Trove edit

Go to the JPTO ASAP, so many answered questioned lie in there. Not to mention Motor Fan magazines I keep ordering left and right. I am discovering many patents with dates you'd never expect, usually very close to company internal decision making. For example, the CD 1994 Accord program was reported to Bloomberg in 1993, as getting revisions in the spring of 1992 belatedly to the raise the hood. The original design was approved on December 18, 1990, a very early date for Honda at nearly 3 years before launch. I think between Motor Fan's 1993 report and an April 1992 filing in Japan, I've seen the original version before it got corrected and then re-filed for patent later in 1992. Plus many other very old patents, USPTO and European OHIM/OAMI don't even have. Plus, nearly all of them list the responsible designers. It really helps our research, that is if you haven't noticed this before me already.--Carmaker1 (talk) 04:33, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roméo Dallaire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ford Mondeo (third generation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autocar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 23 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mitsubishi Lancer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daimler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 5 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walt Disney Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Disney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 25 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"5 speed" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 5 speed and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 5#5 speed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 08:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply