AfD nomination of Anomalous operation

edit
 

An editor has nominated Anomalous operation, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anomalous operation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Pyst

edit

I have nominated Pyst, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyst. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TheIslander 19:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mountain God

edit

Hi! I created a page about a Pervian mountain spirit called Apus. Here is link to the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_god Would you mind cleaning it up or editing it? And changing the title? Thanks! Neptunekh (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

No content in Category:Persian gods

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Persian gods, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Persian gods has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Persian gods, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hydrophilite

edit

Hi! I created a page about a mineral called Hydrophilite. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrophilite Could you edit please? Thanks! Neptunekh (talk) 20:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Atmospherics

edit
 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Atmospherics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for the help Gtrmp in reformatting the Bugler (tobacco) article. I have started adding references, which should take care of the notability issue. Shoessss |  Chat  12:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Atheistic agnosticism

edit
 

An editor has nominated Atheistic agnosticism, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheistic agnosticism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Thoul

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thoul, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoul. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Nilbog

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nilbog, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilbog. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Franchise

edit

I realise that it's been awhile, but do you recall the reason for the move above? Looking for more information - researching naming conventions. - jc37 00:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mathematical disambiguation

edit

Hi Gtrmp. You took a crack at deleting "Category:Mathematical disambiguation" back in March 2006. See CfD Mathematical disambiguation and this post. I think I'm on to something and posted a request here to eventually have Category:Mathematical disambiguation deleted. Also, I'm working on having "Category:Educational institution disambiguation" deleted (See CfD Educational institution disambiguation). GregManninLB (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Hindu gods

edit

I have nominated Category:Hindu gods (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Devas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wikidās ॐ 09:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Hindu goddesses

edit

I have nominated Category:Hindu goddesses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Devi (Hinduism) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wikidās ॐ 09:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Live-action role-playing game

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Live-action role-playing game, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — dαlus Contribs /Improve 06:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional thieves

edit
 

Category:Fictional thieves, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

I just discovered that you were never notified about this CFD. Cgingold (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7

edit

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shiliver Rebbe

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shiliver Rebbe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Neelix (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Frankenstein's Monster (Toho)

edit
 

I have nominated Frankenstein's Monster (Toho), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankenstein's Monster (Toho). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Wikipedia Duplicate pages

edit

I have nominated Wikipedia Duplicate pages (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 03:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminiship

edit

I have nominated Wikipedia:Requests for adminiship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 03:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms

edit

Hello. :) If you hadn't heard, Gary Gygax and Wizards of the Coast have recently been promoted to "Good Article" status. I was also thinking of nominating Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms, and I figured I'd contact you since you've done some work on at least one of those. See the project talk page for discussion on that. BOZ (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Talon (Static Shock)

edit
 

I have nominated Talon (Static Shock), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talon (Static Shock). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alternate titles, and columns in Lists of articles

edit

Hi Gtrmp, you where one of the few people that helped to merg the N64 games lists and get the Japanese titles back onto the main list, but the discussioon has arrived again, and I'd like to invite you to contribute to the Talk:List of Nintendo 64 games#Removal of Alternate Titles and Number of Players where we are discussing the use of keeping alternate titles in the "List of...games" some have suggested that they take up too much space and that other columns could seem to be "useful only to fans", and other things that have been mentioned that, and other 'List of' talk pages. I hope you'll come and give you opinion, and hopefully keep these type of concerns from arising again and again at each "List of" pages. (Floppydog66 (talk) 23:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC))Reply