Since you've lined up references, just re-edit the article. If you're just learning the ropes here like me, either just type in your sources "un-formattedly" or else could copy the code others use to magically put stuff into footnotes. --Justmeherenow 22:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

edit

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 15:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Josef Schultz

edit
 

The article Josef Schultz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject notable for only one event as per WP:BIO1E.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --> Gggh talk/contribs 19:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Josef Schultz for deletion

edit
 

The article Josef Schultz is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Schultz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --> Gggh talk/contribs 00:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply