Draft:Hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134ab

edit

This just seems to be a remake of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane in a different title. Is this, by chance, your research topic/thesis? Excellenc1 (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It is not a thesis, I am PhD in physics, but a process I have been working on for 20 years that I want to have everyone aware of. Gstantchev (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also since it is my first edit in WKP I was confused where to put the title. The draft had my name first and I wanted to change it to Plant Extraction with R-134a. But it probably created a copy of the article. Please help me with the proper naming of the article since it does not let me change. Gstantchev (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I guess you should rather create a section in 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethane instead of a new article; you may want to enquire the Teahouse about this. I'll still transfer your draft to the new title. (Edit: I've renamed the page). Excellenc1 (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Plant Extraction with R-134a has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Plant Extraction with R-134a. Thanks! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Changed the language and references. I have an issue publishing the image to illustrate the solubility. The system rejects the image and uses a link. Is there a way to approve the image for the article? It is our research and illustration image. Gstantchev (talk) 14:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
This submission is more detailed on references, but yes, I did not have a confirmation for the first one that went through Gstantchev (talk) 01:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plant Extraction with R-134a (March 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The other instance have been deleted so that is the right instance to be published. There are no conflicts on the topic. All references have been cited correctly Gstantchev (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest / undisclosed paid editing concern

edit

You said above that it is a process that I have been working on so I am obliged to leave this note and concern. The disclosure of any financial interests in the things you edit about are mandatory under the English Wikipedia’s community policies, as well as the Foundation's Terms of Service.

  Hello, Gstantchev. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The topic is educational and not commercial. This is a technology used in the fragrance and flavor field since 1994 and it is a shame you have no publications about it. Instead, I see a lot of self-promoting articles that you let through! Gstantchev (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plant Extraction with R-134a (April 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. S5A-0043Talk 11:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gstantchev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S5A-0043Talk 11:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Plant Extraction with R-134a

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Plant Extraction with R-134a requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pure5extraction.com/plant-extraction-with-hfc-134a/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S5A-0043Talk 11:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The original publication in the cited site I did since you are purposely delaying the article that has pure informational content. There is not copyright infringement on any topics. Gstantchev (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Gstantchev! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 18:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have not sufficiently addressed the COI question, and a look at pages like this one, one of many to that commercial website you linked, makes it clear what you are doing here. Drmies (talk) 18:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply