Gspinty1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gspinty1 (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gspinty1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Gspinty1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero G coffee cup (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zero G coffee cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Reply

I've moved your request to the bottom of the talk page where it should be. Please don't post the same request on multiple page, it just annoys people. I'm surprised you created a draft without waiting for an answer.

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

• Most of your text is unsourced, and therefore pointless. As for the few "references" you do give, please read what an independent source is. Your sources are pages closely associated with him, featuring him, quoting him and his own patent. A patent doesn't confer notability and isn't, obviously, independent of him.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• Unsourced or inappropriately sourced opinions presented as facts include first patent for an object invented in space first legal invention from off Earth... enabling astronauts to drink liquids more naturally... has added quality of life to the daily routines of astronauts by allowing them to enjoy beverages more naturally... provided scientific insights into fluid dynamics... contributing to the broader understanding of how liquids behave in space.

This is an interesting topic and may be notable, but you can't just write down stuff without sources or to sites that are quoting him and expect it to be accepted. The fact that you make totally unsourced claims about its impact just comes across as promo too. It's best to look for sources and then write an article around the facts you can verify, rather than to slap down some text with a couple of links that mention the product, but aren't actuially indepednet third-party sources Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)