I don't understand why you keep reversing my edits. I site references. I have nothing to do with this sock 6ftladder thing you keep mentioning.

Where did you get the information in this edit?   — Jeff G. ツ 19:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 18:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to International Association of Certified Home Inspectors. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 18:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to International Association of Certified Home Inspectors. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to International Association of Certified Home Inspectors. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit war edit

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on International Association of Certified Home Inspectors. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply