User talk:Grnrchst/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Grnrchst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

WP:SQUAT

Hey Grnrchst I see you are busy with List of anarchist communities so I was wondering if you had any time for Wikipedia:WikiProject Squatting? Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Sources

Hi. Please remember to cite reliable sources when adding content to an article. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 18:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Sources

Thanks for contributing to the article Taborites. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. - Epinoia (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Grnrchst, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Anarchism

Hi Grnrchst,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 01:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Grnrchst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• How to add those all-important references
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Sm8900 (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for using rollback

Hi Grnrchst, I accidentaly used the rollback button, my appologies. (Please see Talk:Anarcho-pacifism#Black_and_white_bisected_flag for the reason why I did removed the flag. It's Wikipedia-fantasy. I would also like to know the sources for the other flags like File:Jewish Anarchist Flag.png) Best regards −Sargoth 20:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Hog Farm (talk) 01:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Adding Native American infoboxes

I've noticed a number of small mistakes/factual inaccuracies in your recent additions of infoboxes (specifically the Old Copper Complex and Adena culture articles). Information in the infoboxes should be contained within and cited in the article body. Please be careful what you include in them in the future. Cheers, Heiro 23:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me, apologies Grnrchst (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Translating

Thank you for creating Land and Freedom Column. It appears to be a translation of the Spanish language article "Columna Tierra y Libertad". When you translate text from a foreign language Wikipedia you should provide attribution to the original authors in your edit summary and by adding a translation tag to the talk page, as I have done in this instance. This is a Wikipedia requirement to conform to its copyright obligations. Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Please comply with the copyright requirements outlined by Cwmhiraeth above. I note you have subsequently created Central Committee of Antifascist Militias of Catalonia, a translation of es:Comité Central de Milicias Antifascistas de Cataluña without leaving the attribution that is required. --John B123 (talk) 16:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Apologies. I'll make sure to do this in future,. Grnrchst (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Grnrchst, nice job on translating some of these articles on anarchism. Just one issue: One usually doesn't translate the titles of sources (books and the like), since that can make it impossible to find the source being cited. The only exception would be if one is referencing a translation of a source. So, for instance, when citing Cappelletti and Rama's El anarquismo en América Latina one would use the Spanish title unless one is citing the English translation of this book. In the latter case, one would then give the page number in the translation and not the original. I've gone ahead and fixed this in the article Anarchism in Paraguay, but I see you've created several more articles with the same issue. I can fix those, but it might take me a little while to get around to it. If you could do it, that would be very helpful.--Carabinieri (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for letting me know! I'll be sure to fix any sources I find. Grnrchst (talk) 20:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, nice continued work with your Español translations! In your edit summaries, when the translation largely relies on Google Translate, it's worth noting this for attribution purposes. Google translations of cc-by-sa Wikipedia content remains freely licensed but if the translation is more or less what Google spits out, it helps for posterity to know whether the translation was mostly by machine or by hand. czar 02:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

uvw logo, membership numbers

Hey G

Thanks for doing the infobox on United Voices of the World, I have tried to update the logo today and wonder if there's an easy way to avoid the permissions/copyright hoops. In theory I can have someone edit the website and upload the logo on a blank page and state that it's cool to republish

Also the membership stats. Box 1 states "3,000 (2020)" and Box 2 states "1,200 (2018)". Is there any way to fix Box 2?

Cheers for your time

Carlos — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 18:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Carlos. The membership number in the infobox was changed to 3,000 (2020) by User:Sujalajus but the citation listed only gives information up to the figure of 1,200 (2018). I'll be reverting this change, unless there is published information of more recent membership numbers to cite. Grnrchst (talk) 18:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again. There is in fact published info in the FT saying 3,000 members: https://www.ft.com/content/576c68ea-3784-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4

Can we quickly sort out the unbalanced tag? What needs to be changed? Thanks

-C — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 14:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi again. Thanks for providing a source, I think it's fair to change that now. (Though I don't know if there's any site-wide rules about sources on membership numbers) As for the unbalanced tag, I think much of the language in the article needs to be neutralized, this is something I'm willing to do when I have the time and energy. It's an incredibly well-sourced article, this is something you should be proud of, I just want to make sure there's no remaining bias in the writing before submitting this for review. (For example: I changed the title of a section labelled "Notable victories" to "Campaign history", as it presented an unbalanced perspective) Grnrchst (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

OK, sounds good. I'll do my best with revising the existing text and continue to expand the page in the coming weeks. Will be in touch again soon. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 17:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

I've created a few new sections, and think we're ready to start looking at the balance/bias. Could you take a couple of minutes to scan the page and copy me a couple of glaring examples, to give me a general idea of what needs to change? Also need some help with the infobox - the aforementioned 3,000 members and link needs to replace the old figure which has an invalid citation. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosatUVW (talk • contribs) 11:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Thanks for translating the article Higinio Carrocera Mortera!

(t · c) buidhe 04:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cites in Andorran Revolution

The article cites "Peruga Guerrero 1998", "Jordi Planellas 2013", and "Segalàs 2012", but no such source are listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors) to highlight such errors in the future. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I just added them back in, both on the english language and catalan language articles. Grnrchst (talk) 09:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Similar issue with Enric Pérez i Farràs: citing "Romero 1994" and "Alexander 2007" (is Alexander supposed to be vol 2 of the work cited in bibliography?) Renata (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Can you also clarify what edition of "Engel" (2005 or 1999) is cited in 70th Mixed Brigade and 147th Mixed Brigade. The two articles cite the work with different years but same ISBN. 18:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Josep Negre i Oliveras moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Josep Negre i Oliveras, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 16:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josep Negre i Oliveras has been accepted

Josep Negre i Oliveras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 01:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

"Battle of Vámospércs" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Vámospércs. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Battle of Vámospércs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

"Battle of Yambol" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Yambol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Battle of Yambol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

"Battle of Puigcerdà" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Puigcerdà. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Battle of Puigcerdà until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Olegario Pachón Núñez

Please add full cite for "Pecellín 1979". Also, please do install the script to highlight such errors. Thanks, Renata (talk) 05:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Also 24th Division (Spain) is missing "Zaragoza 1983". Renata (talk) 01:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Autonomous Action

re: your edit to the list of drafts – this page doesn't see much activity (and I think it makes sense to retire eventually) but for now, you might get more activity on your request if you post directly to WT:@. czar 06:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hi I’ve just reviewed Maksim Matveevich Cherednyak. Thanks very much for creating this very interesting article. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

"Tactical unity" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tactical unity. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Tactical unity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Grnrchst

Thank you for creating Socialistenbond.

User:JJPMaster, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I have added the template {{R from alternative language}} to your page Socialistenbond in order to specify where the redirect comes from. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JJPMaster}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your work. Please note that years (and other chronological items) are not generally linked on en.WP. Nor are common words. Tony (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Estonian punk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Estonian punk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anarchism in Costa Rica

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anarchism in Costa Rica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/angel-cappelletti-anarchism-in-latin-america. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anarchism in Nicaragua

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anarchism in Nicaragua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/angel-cappelletti-anarchism-in-latin-america. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anarchism in Panama

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anarchism in Panama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/angel-cappelletti-anarchism-in-latin-america. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anarchism in Uganda

A tag has been placed on Category:Anarchism in Uganda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Great article

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I reviewed your article Anarchism in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Great article, thank you for your contributions. All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 19:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Former country infoboxes

Hi. Please stop adding the former country inboxes to Indonesia articles. The liberal democracy period, Guided democracy, the New Order were political eras in Indonesia, not countries. The country of Indonesia still exists. Thank you. Regards Davidelit (Talk) 14:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I wasn't trying to imply that with the additions, apologies. Would there be a better category of infobox to use to specify that they are political eras (perhaps country, historical era or political system?), or would it be better if I just left them off entirely?--Grnrchst (talk) 15:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Antti Rautiainen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antti Rautiainen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. The issue is, two of the current citations are bad links, which leaves only a single citation. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or ping me and I'll be glad to have another look. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for getting into contact about this. I've added archive.org links to the citations with dead links, so that part should be sorted. Of course, both of those articles were written by Antti Rautiainen himself, so I'm not sure if fixing that adequately deals with the issue of the sources being reliable and independent. I can look into further sources to add to the draft if this isn't satisfactory enough for review submission.--Grnrchst (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of stateless societies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of stateless societies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stateless societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

LukeSurl ^{t c} 15:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Missing cite in 37th Division (Spain)

The article cites "AGMAV et al." but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Ditto "Ramos 1972" in 71st Mixed Brigade -- or is it supposed to be "Ramos 1994"? and "Téllez 1978" in 136th Mixed Brigade. Renata (talk) 03:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for drawing these to my attention, I'll be sure to install that script. I think this is a case of different editions having been cited in the references and bibliography. For example, Ramos 1994 is the second edition of the Ramos 1972 text. Will go through the Spanish Republican Army stuff I've worked on and see if anything else needs fixing. Thanks again.--Grnrchst (talk) 19:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Anarchist Barnstar
		Thanks for all the work to anarchist related wikipedia. SP00KYtalk 14:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Rumor mill

Hi, Grnrchst sorry for making this public but there is no private messaging feature here and I did not know where else to say it, There was somebody in a social media anarchist group a couple of days ago calling you out specifically for your work on List of anarchist communities, probably someone involved in an edit dispute there, and accusing you of being a Marxist who uses Wikipedia with the malicious intent to malign anarchist topics here. This is all insane sounding and whatever ideology you may or may not hold is irrelevant I know but I just thought you should be aware as it may result in brigading of the article mentioned or others that you have put (a lot of good) work into. SP00KYtalk 18:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. That's incredibly strange and really saddening to hear, considering how much work I've put in to the anarchism wiki project thus far. I'm even actively working on a massive article translation right now... I'll keep an eye on the possible brigading of articles, but don't know how else I can action this really. This kind of thing makes me glad I've largely strayed away from social media. :( --Grnrchst (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

No problem, Yes, i'd usually ignore such deranged nonsense on social media but have seen your edits and pages you have made here multiple times, i pointed out publicy the person making such claims you have been an active contributor to wiki-project anarchism with a link to your contributions. I like to think nobody but the person who has edit problems will not take this seriously. thanks and keep up the good work. :) SP00KYtalk 09:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

"Political opening" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Political opening. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Political opening until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Take thy Barnstar!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Fot your amazing work and your articles you created in relationship to anarchism, seriously great job, I was actually intending to create some of the pages you created but was to lazy. Des Vallee (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Anarchism in Africa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Ivan Markov (Ataman) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ivan Markov (Ataman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Inter-provincial autonomy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Inter-provincial autonomy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Free Caucasus Committee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Free Caucasus Committee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, which parts of the article in particular need more citations? Because it already has three independent sources cited and it's only a small article. Cheers.--Grnrchst (talk) 08:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Lucien Tronchet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucien Tronchet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi. What exactly is unsuitable about this article for mainspace? Because there are a large number of citations listed in the "Bibliography and sources" section. Is it because these citations aren't inline? Thanks.--Grnrchst (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Jing Meijiu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jing Meijiu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Antti Rautiainen

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antti Rautiainen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region moved to draftspace

I've moved your article Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 15:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region has been accepted

Federation of Resistance Societies of the Spanish Region, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

czar 12:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 02:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intercommunalism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Intercommunalism, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zoozaz1 talk 17:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Zoozaz1 I'm confused. I don't see a speedy deletion tag anywhere, nor does this stated reason seem to align with the article itself, nor have I had anything to do with this article in the past. Why am I being notified about this and... what exactly am I being notified about? --Grnrchst (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

The speedy deletion nomination was for the previously existing redirect that had to be deleted to make way for a draft. I presume you were the creator of the redirect. Zoozaz1 talk 20:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Ah yes I think so. Thanks for clearing that up, good to see there's an actual article about this now. --Grnrchst (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucien Tronchet has been accepted

Lucien Tronchet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 13:06, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Elite panic has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Grnrchst. Elite panic, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for editing anarchism in Brazil. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elite panic

Hello! Your submission of Elite panic at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jpatokal (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Benjamim Mota moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Benjamim Mota, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Edgar Rodrigues moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Edgar Rodrigues, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Republic of Indonesia during the National Revolution has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Republic of Indonesia during the National Revolution. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 10:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Elite panic

On 3 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elite panic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during disaster events, elites will typically shift the focus away from disaster relief towards measures of command and control, a behaviour referred to as elite panic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elite panic. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elite panic), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your hook got 11,431 views (476 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2021—nice job! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Parviz Nikkhah

Hello Grnrchst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Parviz Nikkhah for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Umakant Bhalerao: I have responded to the speedy deletion request. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party (British Section of the Third International), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ivan Markov (Ataman)

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ivan Markov (Ataman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Inter-provincial autonomy

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inter-provincial autonomy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Free Caucasus Committee

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Free Caucasus Committee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Southern Society of the Decembrists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Southern Society of the Decembrists where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Inter-provincial autonomy

Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inter-provincial autonomy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jing Meijiu

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jing Meijiu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Society of the Decembrists has been accepted

Southern Society of the Decembrists, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 16:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Going to the People

Hello! Your submission of Going to the People at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bowlhover (talk) 01:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South Asia topic

Template:South Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:East Asia topic

Template:East Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Asia topic

Template:Central Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Western Asia topic

Template:Western Asia topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huliaipole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verbiv.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

"Pronouncement of Lacy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pronouncement of Lacy and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 23#Pronouncement of Lacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Going to the People

On 27 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Going to the People, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1874, thousands of Russian students "[went] to the people" in order to agitate the peasantry towards socialism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Going to the People. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Going to the People), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jing Meijiu

Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jing Meijiu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Antti Rautiainen

Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antti Rautiainen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zhang Minquan

The article Zhang Minquan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only covered in brief in one source (Ishikawa) so is lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 17:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Azariqa, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 19:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey @AhmadLX:, thanks for catching this and making the necessary changes to the article. Unfortunately I made the edit in question years ago, at a time when I was still new to Wikipedia and unaware of the policies on OR or RS. I'm almost certain that I sourced the text from a translation of the Russian Wikipedia article ru:Азракиты, which may explain the inaccurate information and polemical style that you noted in your edits. This is not something I mentioned in my edit summary at the time, as you can see above, I did not know the policy on translating from other Wikipedias until some months after. (I also just noticed that only a couple months before I made that edit, an IP editor from Saint Petersburg significantly expanded the Russian article, in an enormous edit that is still pending verification by Russian Wikipedians) Apologies for my past errors and thanks again for taking the time to make improvements to this article, feel free to ping me again at any time. Regards. --Grnrchst (talk) 19:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Okay no problem. On Kharijites, EI3 is the current best source. If you need, I can provide you relevant articles. Regards. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 20:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer! I may be interested in adding more information to the article on the Najdat, as it seems like that one still needs some citations. Does the EI3 have any articles about them? --Grnrchst (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately no. So far they have these articles on the subject: main (i.e. Kharijites in general), Ibadiyya, and Azariqa. However, I looked into our Wiki article on the Najdat. All the cn-tagged info you can find in this, and EI3's main Kharijite article. However, the former is dated and you should be cautious in using it to give opinions of the author; for hard facts it is a very good source. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 21:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok noted, I'll be sure to attribute as needed. Thanks again! --Grnrchst (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexandrovsk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Benjamim Mota

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benjamim Mota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Edgar Rodrigues

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edgar Rodrigues, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anarchist Barnstar
		For your amazing work improving Ukrainian anarchist articles!—blindlynx 20:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vietnamese anarchists

A tag has been placed on Category:Vietnamese anarchists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Benjamim Mota

Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benjamim Mota".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Edgar Rodrigues

Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edgar Rodrigues".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Could you send me ...

an email me here about a Signpost matter?

Thanks,

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi apologies, I'm confused. What would I be emailing you about exactly? Grnrchst (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry - I'm just used to talking about these things in private. I'd like to republish your interview in The Commoner (Part I. with a link to Part II) in the next Signpost (April 23). I do need to get their permission and a CC-BY SA licence from The Commoner, but I'd like your permission as well. Perhaps you might even send them an email as well saying that it's ok with you. Any help appreciated. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 13:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

That's perfectly fine! Yes you have my permission to do that. :) I will get in contact with them and ask. Thanks for dropping me a line. Grnrchst (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey @Smallbones: I got in touch with them, they've given their full permission to use the text and said you can use whichever license you like. --Grnrchst (talk) 07:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Anarchism interview

Thanks for great interview https://www.thecommoner.org.uk/an-interview-the-anarchist-wikipedia-editor-g/

Bluerasberry (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Free Caucasus Committee

Hello, Grnrchst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Free Caucasus Committee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emilian Makhno

The article Emilian Makhno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The references in this article inherit notability from this person's brother, Nestor Makhn. That he was shot in mistaken indentity of hisbrother does not give notability. The references do not address the biography of this person.
Given the mandatory requirements for Biography WP:NBIO, the references in this article do not address the notability of this person. Notability is not inherited from his brother.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Emilian Makhno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilian Makhno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilian Makhno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Makhno comic

Hi there, I went to send you an email but looks like you don't have one specified. I had found a comic about Makhno while digging through some other files and thought you might be interested. I'll leave a link up for a few days in case you'd like to take a peek. czar 17:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Must be the season—an upcoming PM Press book next year too czar 15:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Aye it seems like there's been a renewal in interest about Makhno lately. Part of what motivated me to see through my work on the article was a big spike in viewership it got a couple months ago. (Although it does seem to be back to the normal <1,000 views per day again) I'll certainly look forward to this new book! Grnrchst (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the link! I should point out that it is spectacularly fictional: pretty much everything depicted in the book either didn't happen, happened differently or wasn't quite so dramatic. Decent graphic novel though, the art in particular is excellent. Grnrchst (talk) 16:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Well sourced article (Voldemar Antoni)

(t · c) buidhe 03:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:National Revolution period in Indonesia

Hello, Grnrchst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Revolution period in Indonesia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

"Revolutionary Mexico" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Revolutionary Mexico and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9#Revolutionary Mexico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Furius (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1931 disestablishments in Korea

A tag has been placed on Category:1931 disestablishments in Korea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1930s disestablishments in Korea

A tag has been placed on Category:1930s disestablishments in Korea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tambov Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Past and Present.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nestor Makhno

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nestor Makhno you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnknownVolin -- UnknownVolin (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Do you have any reliable sources for that claim? Grnrchst

Do you consider Ukrainian and Western MSM as reliable source then? That page has no reason to exists unless you live in a fantasy world where "Ghost of Kyiv" is real. Continuation of that page is an embarrassment for wikipedia, even tho it has already lost all of it credibility 5.129.219.95 (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

You what mate? Grnrchst (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For your excellent work, in maintaining and creating anarchist, and anarchist related articles on Wikipedia. Des Vallee (talk) 19:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Grigoriev/Hryhoriev/Hryhoriv/Nykyfor/Matvii Madness

@Grnrchst I thought I would write you direct to ask how a article move exactly works. Am I correct that after the 11 day period a mod does the actual move based on the consensus achieved in the discussion? By the way, I don't know if you noticed but I changed the proposed move from Nykyfor Hryhoriev to Nykyfor Hryhoriv. I hope this was allowed. If not, I apologize.

Another question I have is what is the goal we are trying to achieve? Is it to provide a historically accurate transliteration, a transliteration based on the currently accepted Ukrainian spelling, or the most commonly used variant in English (which would be the current Russian variant)? The answers would be different in each case, being: Nykyfor Hryhoriv, Nykyfor Hryhoriev, and Nikifor Grigoriev. This is where some of my confusion comes from and maybe also some of differences of opinion appearing in the thread. Honestly, I'm fine with Hryhoriv, Hryhoriev, or even leaving it as russified Grigoriev. The only variant I'm totally opposed to is using Matvii as the first name, which is ahistorical and as far as I know is based on a rumoured nickname. Any help clarifying these questions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! UnknownVolin (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Aye that's correct and yes, you're allowed to change the proposed move, it happens a lot.

Wikipedia's common name policy often ends up winning the day in these kinds of discussions, but they can go the other way if consensus leans that way. Just recently there were quite a few move discussions for Odesa, as it had previously been commonly known by the Russian transliteration "Odessa", but the page was moved when it became clear that the academic and journalistic tendency was moving towards the Ukrainian transliteration. Personally I think this can also be the case for Hryhoriv, and well-reasoned arguments for this are the best course. That the Encyclopedia of Ukraine uses Nykyfor Hryhoriv, I think, is the best indication for the spelling we should use. Grnrchst (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

That makes sense. Thanks. I imagine when Ukrainian and Russian wikis collide over toponyms it can get testy. By the way, I read your interview with The Commoner. I really enjoyed it. UnknownVolin (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Eichenfeld

@Grnrchst I read over your Eichenfeld article. It is very well written and balanced so far imo. I just made a few language changes and very minor corrections here and there. If you feel any need to be discussed we can take it to the talk page. UnknownVolin (talk) 06:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for checking it out. That it's not inaccurate or unbalanced is enough for me right now. This was a genuinely difficult thing to read about, due to how harrowing the events described were. I admire your fortitude for the research you have done into this. Grnrchst (talk) 14:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nestor Makhno

The article Nestor Makhno you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nestor Makhno for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnknownVolin -- UnknownVolin (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thnx for the help! ADHD makes me miss the tiny details so thnx so much for your help with the infoboxes! Chefs-kiss (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Lacerda de Moura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maria Lacerda de Moura

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maria Lacerda de Moura you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maria Lacerda de Moura

The article Maria Lacerda de Moura you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Maria Lacerda de Moura for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halyna Kuzmenko

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halyna Kuzmenko you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maria Lacerda de Moura

The article Maria Lacerda de Moura you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Maria Lacerda de Moura for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

My commiserations that the translated sources were plagiarised in the original. Hope you continue to work on the article! Mujinga (talk) 23:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halyna Kuzmenko

The article Halyna Kuzmenko you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Halyna Kuzmenko for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Nicely done! czar 06:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Good work! ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 22:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Halyna Kuzmenko

On 30 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Halyna Kuzmenko, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Halyna Kuzmenko promoted the Ukrainization of the Makhnovist movement, successfully increasing the use of the Ukrainian language by Russian speakers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Halyna Kuzmenko. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Halyna Kuzmenko), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

WiG Editathon Barnstar

		Women in Green Editathon — October '22
		Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nominations Maria Lacerda de Moura, Halyna Kuzmenko and Teresa Mañé and to GA reviews for Nellie McClung, Jennie Scott Griffiths and Marcela Revollo at the WiG Wildcard Edition editathon! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Father (honorific), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batko.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Good article nominations

Hi Grnrchst, thank you for your assistance in reviewing at WP:Good article nominations. When you pass a nomination, please remember to add it to the appropriate list of Wikipedia:Good articles. All steps that should be taken are listed at WP:GAN/I#PASS. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, CMD (talk) 08:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Oh whoops! Thanks for notifying me, I've listed it the now. -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)