Greenwoodma

Welcome

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page General Architecture for Text Engineering, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

General Architecture for Text Engineering

Feel free to reinstate it, but please put it in only if it is the official site (in accordance with WP:EL) and in an external links section at the bottom of the page. Also, I am curious. Based on your message to me it seems that you may be an employee of General Architecture for Text Engineering. We have a policy about conflicts of interest, when editors edit articles to things like their own band, a company they work for, or so forth. If you are an employee, please try to keep the policy for a neutral point of view in mind when editing and try to avoid weasel words and peacock terms. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in keeping the article up to date. I will try and pop in to see how it is developing and fix anything that resembles advertising. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I have added a note that information from the site http://gate.ac.uk/family/coming-soon/ is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence so that other editors do not revert your edit like I did (but later restored). I had feared that it was a copyright violation. My bad. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

After looking for more information, I found here that a non-commercial license is not suitable with Wikipedia's copyright policy and cannot be copied freely. Wikipedia's text is not limited to non-commercial uses so moving it would violate that policy. As such, I am going to have to remove the section you added and ask that you rewrite the information in your own words. Thanks! Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I have tagged the section as a possible copyright violation for review by another editor. As I have noted above, the fact that our license is not non-commercial makes the licenses incompatible (per the SA clause in the license). If GATE.ac.uk wants to allow Wikipedia to use the information, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry that you feel that way. As I mentioned above, I am not an expert in copyright law. To be honest, my major is in literature. However, I have attempted to be straightforward but polite with my concerns. Because you raised a good point at my talk page, I attempted to ask for a second, more expert opinion, with the tag on the main article page for editors who regularly look for copyright violations and would be more expert than I. I did not mean to insinuate that you were "somehow not begin open about (your) interest in the page." I was just concerned that the fact that Wikipedia allows commercial use would violate GATE.ac.uk's Creative Commons license.

With the rewrite, all of the copyright concerns are rendered moot. Thank you, and sorry for wasting your time. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Notification

I have requested a more expert opinion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 May 6. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:N Scale model of BR Standard Class 3 2-6-2T.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:N Scale model of BR Standard Class 3 2-6-2T.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)