June 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Two Brothers Brewing. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 15:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Two Brothers Brewing incomplete

edit

It looks like you have not started the articles deletion discussion page. You will then need to open the articles for deletion log. -- allennames 02:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you. The instructions are a bit criptic, yes.. any rate I do apprciate your help.Greenbreww (talk) 02:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The following line of text (for the second nomination) should have been placed at the end(?) of the current articles for deletion log.

{{subst:afd3 | pg=Two Brothers Brewing (2nd nomination)}}

Please replace 2nd with whatever is appropriate. You can also read WP:AFD as I should have told you earlier. -- allennames 03:06, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I did read the instructions, any rate it is now fixed by Mr. Hammer.Greenbreww (talk) 03:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
The article's AfD pointed to the now deleted 3rd nomination so I edited it. Please feel free to have Mr. Hammer check to see if everything is now correct. -- allennames 03:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Regarding this AfD, please do bear in mind that you're not supposed to "vote" more than once. Thank you. --Bfigura (talk) 00:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, I take that as a yes.--Milowent (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

YOU doing it again... the wiki thing of putting words in other people's mouth. WHY???Greenbreww (talk) 15:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Because the troll alarm is blazing.--Milowent (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The thing which is self evident is, Wikipedia policy is only followed when it suits the majority. The ad humomium attack, the refusal to acknowledge the points I make show the bankruptcy of Wikipedia and how it's lacks the rule of law. MY HYPOCRITE ALARM IS BLAZING.Greenbreww (talk) 04:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Let's go have a beer summit sometime at some place other than Two Brothers, then. Future generations may bemoan this injustice but we'll be dead and won't care.--Milowent (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply