Grav-Leo02
November 2018 edit
Hello, I'm Domdeparis. I noticed that you recently removed content from Italian invasion of France without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of St. Quentin (1557), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Nick-D (talk) 04:43, 10 November 2018 (UTC) |
Request for unblock edit
Grav-Leo02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've been blocked by the user Nick-D for sockpuppetry. I didn't got advised by anyone for this and i'm not sockpuppeting anyone Grav-Leo02 (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
CheckUser evidence indicates that are Kuru666. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- This account has been continuing the edits of blocked Kuru666 (talk · contribs) who has also been block evading via IP editing. Nick-D (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- But i'm not Kuru666
- When asked if they had had another account before this one this editor claimed to have edited with an account for 2 days, 2 years ago [1] but on their 2nd mainspace edit [2] they showed quite advanced editing skills such as piping and citation and on their 6th mainspace edit they were making very complicated edits to infoboxes [3] that were identical to edits made by Kuru666 and various IP users that took over when Kuru666 was blocked. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- But i'm not Kuru666
But i'm not him, i've just took the source that Kuru666 put in because it was acceptable, i checked online.
- The admin who reviewed your unblock request has indicated that check user evidence shows that both accounts are identical. If you wish to be unblocked I would suggest that you make the request from the puppet master account (Kuru666) and make an appeal that doesn't simply deny the evidence. You might like to read Wikipedia:Appealing a block#Types of appeal #2 "Appeals for clemency". Dom from Paris (talk) 13:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)