Gourrohitgour2

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gourrohitgour2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Gourrohitgour2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Gourrohitgour2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gourrohitgour2/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Gourrohitgour2/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 18:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Orange Mike | Talk 01:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

reliable source

That ain't one. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.  Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 05:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Subjects of Wikipedia articles that are about companies must meet WP:NCORP. This subject does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. What else would you like to write about?  Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 05:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gourrohitgour2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I understand your concern that why you blocked me. I'll just say in favor of me that advertising or promotion is not my purpose. I also want to do valuable contribution to make productive content for the wikipedia. The page I had created did not violate of your policy or guidline. Please let me know what you are asking for. Which I can not tell you. The reliable source that you are demanding is given below: https://www.go2sharerestaurant.com Rohit Gour 04:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That is not a reliable source. The fact that you think otherwise is an excellent reason for keeping your account blocked. Yunshui ^雲_水 06:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I also see that you actually own go2sharerestaurant, a fact which you have studiously kept quiet about. Wikipedia is not a platform for you to advertise your own site. You are in breach of both Wikipedia's internal content policies and of the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. If you want a billboard, go elsewhere. Yunshui ^雲_水 06:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gourrohitgour2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Alright, I am really sorry for that. Please unblock me. Give me a chance to make valuable contribution for the wikipedia. Next time you can block me, If I repeat this mistake. Rohit Gour 07:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am administratively closing your appeal as you have not responded to 331dot's question. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:02, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What contributions do you want to make if unblocked? You won't be allowed to edit about anything related to your conflict of interest, and you need to declare as a paid editor. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)