Got a 69 in my wine
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of The cheapo (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
|
January 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lego Group, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lego Group was changed by Got a 69 in my wine (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-25T22:23:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Reliableforever. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 22:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 22:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Attacks?
editYou might want to read WP:CIVIL.... SIS 22:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- BORING!!!!!! Stay out of it sister, go catch vandals elsewhere you ain't gonna find any here! --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind. Whatever.
SIS22:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind. Whatever.
- Giggity Giggity Goo! --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:HexaChord. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord 2 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- I was not making a personal attack I was just expalining your question dude chill out. --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- You attacked an editor who has not been here for a week. You better chill out.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 23:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- you better chill out because nobody cares about that editor --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- You attacked an editor who has not been here for a week. You better chill out.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 23:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Got a 69 in my wine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm so so so sorry! I did not mean to cause any harm! I will never do it again and I am sincerely sorry
Decline reason:
You were warned to stop multiple times, and responded with more incivility. There's also the issue Acro points out below, which seems to be a reasonable conclusion. Declined. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 00:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Probable sock of The cheapo (talk · contribs). First edit was a detailed attack on Reliableforever (talk · contribs), who had contact with The cheapo. Editing patterns are similar. I'm inclined to upgrade to indef. Acroterion (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Upgraded to indef. The first edit shows that the user is not here to edit an encyclopedia. Review welcome, as always. Acroterion (talk) 00:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)