Glycinia, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Glycinia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Psychometrics edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please use reliable sources with your additions, rather than self-published non-English websites. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:51, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please include more information when citing sources, and English-language sources are preferred edit

@Glycinia: I have looked at some of your edits over the past few days, and often you are not including enough information when you cite sources. For a list of information fields that should be included whenever you cite a source, see Wikipedia:Citing sources § What information to include. Author, year, and title are not sufficient.

I noticed that you cited Russian-language sources about subjects where reliable English-language sources are available. English-language sources are preferred over non-English sources on the English-language Wikipedia, because the Wikipedia policy on verifiability requires that readers can check that information comes from a reliable source, and that the source says what Wikipedia claims that it says. For Wikipedia's policy on non-English sources, see Wikipedia:Verifiability § Non-English sources. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 03:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Text edit

Needing a page number. Also does not really fit in the lead. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Dissociative identity disorder is an extreme manifestation of dissociation - a mechanism of psychological defense, in which a person begins to perceive what is happening to him as if it happens to someone else. The mechanism is useful, as it allows one to protect himself from excessive, intolerable emotions, but in cases of excessive activation of this mechanism, dissociative disorders arises McWilliams, Nancy (2011). "Psychoanalytic Diagnosis, Second Edition: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process". The Guilford Pres."

December 2018 edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Caution for spamming books by Oleg Maltsov all over Wikipedia.Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Collective unconscious, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for reference spamming for adding self-published material by Oleg Maltsov as "reference" to a considerable number of articles, including adding the same "references" again even after being reverted.Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Szondi test. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. See text in warning above (they've been spamming self-published material on a personal website as "references" on a considerable number of articles).[1]Tom | Thomas.W talk 18:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply