Glutenfreegoods

January 2019

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Coeliac disease because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coeliac disease. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Scott (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Glutenfreegoods (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry, I honestly had no idea adding relevent links was not allowed (I was told it was okay). I thought they got removed right away from another admin, so I'm not sure why you blocked me hours later, Scott. Understood though. Sorry. Will not do that again. Did not mean to spam as that was not my intention. Glutenfreegoods (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you state there is nothing else you want to edit, there is no need to unblock you. If you later find something you want to edit, you may request unblock at that time. You may want to read about five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about it. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 13:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please describe what your association with the website you linked to is, if any. What do you intend to edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 08:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

None. I won't be editing anything again because I obviously don't understand how wikipedia works. I thought those quality posts were adding to the topic and were relevent.

Wikipedia is not for merely posting and linking to information. If you read some of the policies linked to above, they will help describe when and where external links are appropriate. 331dot (talk) 13:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)