User talk:Glossologist/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

License tagging for Image:Daugavpils Shosejas iela.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daugavpils Shosejas iela.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Subate Catholic church.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Subate Catholic church.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Daugavpils Old Belief Church of Saint Nikola.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daugavpils Old Belief Church of Saint Nikola.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Daugavpils coa.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Daugavpils coa.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Daugavpils0203.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daugavpils0203.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Daugavpils_coat_of_arms.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Daugavpils_coat_of_arms.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 17:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Daugavpils/2

A tag has been placed on Template:User Daugavpils/2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Daugavpils novads

Sveicināti, ja varat ievietot vairāk kā divas bildes, tad ērti lietot veidni GALERIJA (skat. Ozolnieku novads) un raksts izskatīsies pievilcīgāks.--Riharcc (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Pašlaik Vikikrātuvē citu bilžu nav, tuvākajā nākotnē būs jāpievieno. Novadam ir ļoti daudz, ko parādīt.

Kā izskatās raksts, ir tomēr atkarīgs no monitora ekrāna proporcijām. Piemēram, manā laptopā izskatās tīri labi. :) — Glebchik (talk) 18:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Konotop. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 02:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Warning

Please stop deleting referenced text from wikipedia articles, as you did in Belarusian referendum, 1996. Please explain your actions in Talk:Belarusian referendum, 1996 and reach an agreement wth other editors. - Altenmann >t 20:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I've written my explanation twice in the edit summery. However, Czalex preferred to undo my edits without any explanation (2 last reverts). — Glebchik (talk) 01:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

And I didn't delete text (except 1st edit), I made requests for sources. — Glebchik (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your editing in article about Belarusians.

Dear Glebchik, before constantly clicking on "undo" saying that somebody is not Belarusian, please read biography of famous Belarusians (upper left corner section). You keep removing Kastuś Kalinoŭski and Tadeusz Kaściuszko from that section just because you don't consider them Belarusian despite of biographical and historical facts.

First of all, Kastuś Kalinoŭski's family has Polish background which was centuries ago but all his recent ancestors were Belarusian. Me for instance, I have Polish Catholic great-grandmother, all my other relatives are Belarusians. Does the fact that I have Polish background makes me not Belarusian even thought almost all my relatives are Belarusian?

Second, regarding Tadeusz Kaściuszko, again, please, read his biography, even here on Wikipedia. He was born in present-day Belarus, in Kosava to Belarusian parents. Yet, somehow he isn't Belarusian.

Looking forward to hear from you.

With all respect,

     Roscisław R.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscislaw Roman (talk • contribs) 21:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 

Roscislaw Rom 00:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscislaw Roman (talk • contribs)

Vandalism

I have reported 173.54.99.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism#User-reported--Toddy1 (talk) 05:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Susan B. Anthony. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Binksternet (talk) 15:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I wanted to revert the vandalism, made by the anonymous, but I was viewing an old version of the page (the edit was already reverted) and so the system performed completely opposite action. — Glebchik (talk) 15:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Sveiks/Zdrastye

Drop me a note when you have a chance, I see you don't have Wiki Email enabled.  PЄTЄRS VЄСRUМВА ►talk  01:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Adm ctr

Generally yes, but in this case WP:ENGVAR also comes into play. Just because the author of administrative centre preferred the Commonwealth spelling does not automatically mean that all articles linking to it should utilize it as well. Additionally, {{Infobox Russian inhabited locality}} is used in articles which predominantly use the American spelling, so your change introduces mass inconsistency as well. Linking through a redirect in this case is fine or, if it really bugs you, you can pipe the link through using [[administrative centre|administrative center]]. Does this answer your question?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 24, 2010; 20:08 (UTC)

DYK for Ss. Boris and Gleb Cathedral, Daugavpils

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Be objectiv!

You can delete warning but I will continue to observe your further work. You need to be aware that it is not nice what you are doing. If you love Russia then you need to connect Russia and Ukraine rather than work against the friendship beetwen Ukrainans and Russians. Best regard! Stay focus! --SeikoEn (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Please, read Wikipedia:Consensus. If you make an edit adding a new information and get reverted, you have to go to talk page and prove that you're right in discussion, and not just to revert back and start an edit war. And don't call any user “fascist” or “anti-Ukrainian”, this is not a “warning” but a personal attack. Btw, I'm not from Russia. -- Regards, Glebchik (talk) 12:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Honest work

I count on your honesty in future work!--SeikoEn (talk) 09:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Farewell!

You have answered me at Jimbo Wales‎.
First, you aren't right! Has begun the conflict not I, and that person who forbade me to write comments to my actions in my native language. When you beat on the person, you will be silent hardly. Here and I have answered his attack. I don't intend to suffer racism and nationalist prejudices.
Secondly, I won't return to the Russian project. In other, as well as I will refuse participation in Wikipedia. As here a continuous deceit. And first of all that is the free encyclopedia where don't have a place racism and nationalism.
Actually I have faced it: racist attacks.
And me for it also have accused almost of all mortal sins. Moreover have blocked the account of my brother his nickname ΑνΚοράκι, which in what hasn't been got mixed up. He only read your encyclopedia. At us the computer same. He uses the Internet from my computer.
Thirdly, Greeks never and to anybody didn't kowtow. And I too am not going to do it.
I have already got to myself a blog where I will freely write that me interests in any language convenient for me.
So, most likely me here more never will be.Όπως έχω δώσει μια νόμιμη πορεία σε αυτή τη σύγκρουση ...
Farewell! Κοράκι (talk) 07:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

That's sad. But I still hope you'll change your mind. Αντίο. --Glebchik (talk) 09:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)