CS1 error on Rafa Nadal Academy

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rafa Nadal Academy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

İlker Karter Air Base moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to İlker Karter Air Base. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 03:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello.
Well to be super fair, if that's the issue, there is not much that can be done. It's a military base, it was part of the Airports in Cyprus template and Airports in Cyprus template, its mere existence is corroborated on Google Maps. This article was translated from tr.wikipedia.org.
Official source from gov.ct.tr indicates its presence...
If this is not enough to make a military airfield page on the english Wikipedia, then you can delete the draft page, as there is nothing more that I can do about it. Global Donald (talk) 03:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kinga Wyrzykowska moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Kinga Wyrzykowska, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Zénith (balloon)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Zénith (balloon) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein talk 07:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on 1968 Sainte-Marie Douglas DC-6 crash

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1968 Sainte-Marie Douglas DC-6 crash, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Aeronaves de México Flight 111

edit

Hello, Global Donald,

Thank you for creating Aeronaves de México Flight 111.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Very nice article! I suggest changing the passengers section to one for notable passengers, such as the scientist and oceanographer. The article could also benefit from extra sourcing for points such as the fatality count.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|OnlyNano}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

OnlyNanotalk 20:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Citron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hammer & Chisel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Zénith (balloon)

edit

On 19 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zénith (balloon), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the two victims of the Zénith balloon incident are depicted holding hands on their tomb (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zénith (balloon). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zénith (balloon)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 40,069 views (1,669.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aeroflot Flight 1770, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vnukovo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Global Donald. Thank you for your work on Aeroflot Flight 136. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Le Peuple singe moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Le Peuple singe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Le Figaro
added links pointing to Tintin and Causeur
Antoine de Maximy
added a link pointing to Amazon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

1951 Aradan Aeroflot An-2 crash moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to 1951 Aradan Aeroflot An-2 crash. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 23:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

About

edit

i actually created Pélicot affair by --Sunuraju (talk) 04:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
I apologize, I didn't see that the article was already created.
The WikiData related to the french article didn't show your article for some reason when I made the article.
I don't really know what to do, so I asked the help desk.
Sorry for the inconvenience, it's unfortunate. Hopefully it will be sorted out quickly.
Cheers,
--Global Donald (talk) 04:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
yeah I need add sources from latest updates from case by --Sunuraju (talk) 08:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphan article Mélissa Da Costa

edit

Greetings, Today I de-orphaned this article by adding a link at List of authors by name: D article.

Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 12:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Le peuple singe 1989 poster.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Le peuple singe 1989 poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hi Global Donald! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mazan rapes case that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. C F A 💬 17:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi!
You're probably mistaken, the edit in which I added the list was not tagged as minor edit. The one that was consisted in correcting a mistake I did right before, which was unintentionally removing text.
I believe it counts as a minor edit, since the one with extraneous added text was not tagged as such and that I just corrected an error I made prior to that second edit.
Have a good day. --Global Donald (talk) 18:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I hope itlatan Wikipedia will cover case by --Sunuraju (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Le Figaro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tintin and Causeur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Homefront Pictures moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Homefront Pictures. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 1952 Aeroflot Ilyushin Il-12 crash for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1952 Aeroflot Ilyushin Il-12 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1952 Aeroflot Ilyushin Il-12 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 10:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aeroflot Flight 34 for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aeroflot Flight 34 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 34 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 1952 Leningrad mid-air collision for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1952 Leningrad mid-air collision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1952 Leningrad mid-air collision until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lolzer3k 15:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia

edit

Hello, I have looked at some of your recently created articles and they appear to be direct translations of Wikipedia articles from other languages. Please be sure to take a look at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia to familiarize yourself with the attribution requirements when you perform a translation of an article, and please take the time to correct the attribution on the articles that you have already created. Thanks, RecycledPixels (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I see you've made the same error with your recently-created article, Saint Petersburg State University Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty, which appears to be a direct translation of the article from the Russian Wikipedia, but you did not properly attribute the article. These type of translations can be done, but they need to be done correctly. Again, please look closely at the Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia article to learn how to perform such translations properly. Thank you, RecycledPixels (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I see you've attempted to address the issue with Saint Petersburg State University Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty article by using the {{Translated page}} talk page template. However, as it states on that template instruction page, the use of that template alone is not sufficient to satisfy the licensing requirements. You're on the right track, though. The first paragraph of the Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia article describes how to properly provide attribution at the time of the article creation: "At a minimum, this means providing an edit summary at the destination page—that is, the page into which the material is copied—stating that content was copied, together with a link to the source (copied-from) page, e.g. Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution." That is how you would do it on a new edit. You can see how to retroactively meet attribution requirements by seeing how I addressed the issue on the 1982 Sukhumi Dranda Airport runway collision article you created last month; look at the edit history for my recent edit. Hope that helps. RecycledPixels (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aeroflot Flight 112 for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aeroflot Flight 112 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 112 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aeroflot Flight 227 (1956) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aeroflot Flight 227 (1956) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 227 (1956) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aeroflot Flight 227 (1969) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aeroflot Flight 227 (1969) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 227 (1969) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SirMemeGod12:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Aeroflot-Yugavia Flight 519 and Yugavia Flight S-519

edit

You created the article Aeroflot-Yugavia Flight 519. There is also an article Yugavia Flight S-519 with virtualyl the same content. One should be turned into a Wikipedia:Redirect. The two Russian sources give C-519 as the flight number, so maybe Aeroflight-Yugavia Flight 519 should be the Redirect, but I am not an expert on Russian flight numbers. I will also inform User:Ablazc who created the other article. Proofreader (talk) 12:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aeroflot Flight F-637 for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aeroflot Flight F-637 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight F-637 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 08:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 1962 Aral Sea Li-2 crash for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1962 Aral Sea Li-2 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1962 Aral Sea Li-2 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ru:Катастрофа Let L-410 под Костромой to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Aviation accidents in Japan involving U.S. military and government aircraft post-World War II for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aviation accidents in Japan involving U.S. military and government aircraft post-World War II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviation accidents in Japan involving U.S. military and government aircraft post-World War II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Launchballer 13:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply