Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Girly Fungi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Girly Fungi

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Girly Fungi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, Girly Fungi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by InterstellarGamer12321 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Please don't keep submitting a draft article for review without making any changes to address the reason for it having previously declined, as you have done with User:Girly Fungi/sandbox. Doing so serves no useful purpose, and wastes reviewers' time which could otherwise have been spent on more useful work. JBW (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The text in the sandbox appears to have been directly copied from a Google Books profile. I'm afraid it may be a copyright violation. Girly Fungi, what you write on Wikipedia must be a summary of your sources, written in your own words - please do not simply copy and paste. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Thank you for pointing that out. The draft infringes copyright, and I have deleted it. JBW (talk) 09:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to List of ISO 639-1 codes, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Naming list articles as "List of ___" is standard; please see the guidelines at WP:LISTNAME. The name certainly was not a misspelling, as you had indicated in your edit summary. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


I see that you have moved the page User:Girly Fungi/sandbox to User:Real Friends (book). I'm not sure what you were trying to do, but since there is no user account called "Real Friends (book)" it must have been some kind of mistake, so I have moved the page back. JBW (talk) 21:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real Friends (August 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Schminnte was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Schminnte (talk contribs) 18:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Aw! After all those declines, you need a break! Have a PURR-FECT relaxation session :)

StrawberryChi'sCake (talk) 07:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@StrawberryChi'sCakeThank you! Girly Fungi (talk) 07:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why references?

edit

Wikipedia requires that facts be verified by independent, reliable source references. See WP:42. David notMD (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 22:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.