Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Laurelle Mehus. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. You do not have control of the article even if you are Laurelle Mehus. Your recent complaints at the WP:Help Desk are tendentious editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Girlntundra. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Laurelle Mehus, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 22:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Come talk to us.

edit

I see your point about the magazine cover image, and I have gone ahead and re-added it to the page underneath the infobox, while leaving the image that clearly shows her/your face as the main lead image. I would invite you to come to the article's talk page to discuss that and any other issues you have with the recent changes to the article. I and other editors will be very happy to explain why each and every change was made, and what problems we have with the article, both as it was and as it stands. We will be happy to help you understand what Wikipedia is and how it works and all the relevant policies. Our goal is not to destroy the article or make it worse; our goal is to make it better, make it conform with the rest of the encyclopedia, make sure it is accurate, neutral, and verifiable. So please, come talk to us at Talk:Laurelle Mehus and let's work together instead of fighting. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 02:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

In addition; you indicated on the help page that you would like the article deleted. That may be a likely outcome, as there is some question if it meets the guidelines for inclusion. Please come to the talk page and discuss this with other contributors. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 03:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

please delete the page about me and my photos from wiki common - i am blocked from editing the photos- so i did not leave a message there - i did on laureele mehus talk- thank you kindly.

Thank you for responding on the Laurelle Mehus talk page. I have gone ahead and put a template on the article asking for it to be deleted. Once it has been deleted, I will request the photographs on Commons be deleted too. I hope this incident doesn't leave a bad taste in your mouth for Wikipedia. The concern was simply that policies weren't being followed and you seemed unwilling to discuss things with other contributors. If you have questions, feel free to ask me and I can try to help you. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 05:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I requested this article and photos be deleted February 3, 2015. I am requested the article and photos be deleted immediately. The article is no longer factual and needs to be deleted immediately.

Your question at the Help desk

edit
 
Hello Girlntundra. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
Message added on 03:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at WP: Help Desk. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You do not own the article, even if it is about you and even if you (in violation of policy) created it, and your demands that it be deleted immediately are disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


My request for deletion was dated February 3, 2015. The help desk said the deletion would occur after 7 days. On February 10, 2015 when I followed up I was again told it would occur after 7 days. I then pointed out the request date was actually February 3, 2015, hence 7 days had past. Before the request for deletion I pointed out the reason for the request was the article was no longer factual. (After an "editor" had cut 90% of the article and a second editor who came upon the article afterwards could not understood why credits were listed under 2 names - and I no longer cared to try and explain that an "editor" cut the words that explained and if I corrected the article that this "editor" would reverse back to her way.) I do not own the article but the article does need to be factual, and because it was not factual I requested the article be removed. My intention was not to offend you it was to delete the article by your policy. It has been an interesting learning experience.

The article about you has been deleted because of a lack of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 08:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
For the record I closed the debate and deleted the article some 8 hours early. Your interesting experience is not unusual, but it's OK some of us speak noob. PLEASE REMAIN CALM. The images of you ("your images") remain on Wikimedia Commons as a result of being released under licence. You have received several offers of help to get these images deleted. I suggest you calmly accept one of these offers, and find a Commons admin if you can, as Commons is a whole other place and you will have a tougher time there. Please get in touch if there are any further problems here (not there). Good luck. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply