Third-party sources for Rajeev Institute of Technology

edit

Greetings, good work on adding references to Rajeev Institute of Technology. It's now distinctly better than an {unreferenced} article. However, note that you want to track down some WP:RS (reliable sources) which are external to the subject. It can be fine to quote the subject itself regarding basic facts (founding, number of students, etc), but for objective perspective it's also necessary to include neutral, third-party references such as newspaper articles, academic journals discussing the institution, or mentions in published books. Good work, just keep in mind the ways you can use RS to continue to improve the article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


External sources added for Rajeev Institute of Technology

edit

I have added external sources and third party references with respect to the main article, Unfortunately I couldn't get any references from news-publications. Now I want to know about Peacock terms. How can I improve further? Giri 189 (talk) 11:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Reva Institute of Technology and Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply