User talk:Giraffedata/comprised of
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is a subpage of Giraffedata's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This is the talk page for the user giraffedata's user subpage "comprised of", an essay on the phrase "comprised of" and giraffedata's work to keep it out of Wikipedia.
The purpose of this page is to talk about that essay, including any discussion of the subject of the essay, with anyone and everyone who is interested in the topic. If you have something to say to the author of the essay but it doesn't amount to discussion of the essay or the subject of the essay (i.e. it isn't something you intend to discuss with everyone who is interested in the topic), a more appropriate place to comment is Giraffedata's user talk page. Giraffedata is the editor of this page (as a form of user page, unlike an article page, it has an owner). Giraffedata does not manipulate the conversation, but does maintain the format of the page. (In other words, this is NOT an article talk page.) If you add a new comment, please put it in a new section at the bottom of the page. If it turns out that the comments are better organized by subject than by date, we'll reexamine this policy. A response, of course, should go in the same section with the comment to which it responds. |
Start a new discussion thread |
Do you have a whitelist?
editYou've "fixed" a file name in Nadira Ilana four times now. Can you whitelist it or something? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Wow, four times. That must be a record. I guess I'm not used to file names that look just like captions; I'll keep an eye out for those now.
- Yes, the Wikipedia version of a whitelist for copy editing is the hidden sic tag. I will apply that now. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 22:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
An interesting variation!
editSee this one, by an editor who claims that they "quadruply check" all their edits! See also User talk:Crouch, Swale#Careless editing continuing, where I mentioned you and your campaign. PamD 08:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- "Compromised of" really surprised me the first time I saw it, but it actually happens several times a year on Wikipedia -- I search for it twice a year and usually find it. The only reason I know about it is that someone put an entry for it in Wikipedia:Lists of common misspellings/Grammar and miscellaneous. I've always wondered what mental level that error is: a typo where you set out to write "comprised" and your fingers type "compromised" or where you actually think you heard "compromised" when someone said "comprised". Or maybe just careless use of autocomplete by an editor typing out an article with his thumbs. Your exchange with the writer proves it isn't a typo, because the writer calls it a "grammatical error" and suggests the writer just needed to be educated. So thanks for pointing this out to me. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
I love this.
editThat's all. Thank you for removing my "comprised of". I've banished the phrase from my vocabulary. Niplav (talk) 13:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)