Your submission at Articles for creation: Dalood (June 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Dan arndt (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Giorgi.cheminava! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello Giorgi.cheminava. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Giorgi.cheminava. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Giorgi.cheminava|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 09:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Giorgi.cheminava (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Thank you very much for responding to my request, I would like to clarify that I am not getting any compensation for it.
You say "I am General manager of the brand DALOOD" in which case you are deemed to be a paid editor and will need to make the mandatory disclosure. Theroadislong (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Giorgi.cheminava (talk) 11:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Thank you for your feedback, I appreciate it. I have stated it as the paid article. Could you please update me what should I do next?Reply

Draft:Dalood

edit
 

Hello, Giorgi.cheminava. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Dalood.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 09:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply