Giolocam
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Giolocam, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Giolocam! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
Warning about your recent edits in 2 different pages. edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of European countries by average wage, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by average wage, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop making disruptive edits inserting invented data such as in List of European countries by average wage and removing the official order such as in the page List of countries by average wage. You have been warned in the page of a Wikipedia librarian and you still continue to do the same changes even if they're clearly disruptive. You have already broken also Wikipedia:Three-revert rule in the page List of European countries by average wage so try to prove your data to reach a consensus before you do further edits, eitherwise I will have to elevate this message to a real report against vandalism. --Pfarla (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Pfarla (talk) 02:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- permalink for easy reference --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.