Blocked edit

Checkuser indicates that you are behind the recent page-move vandalism spree done with the account User:Ultimate cosmic evil. As this account was created two months ago, and used to disrupt Wikipedia on a massive scale, both accounts have been blocked indefinitely. To be unblocked, please user the {{unblock}} template, and make your case for why you should be unblocked. A couple other checkusers have already reviewed the situation, though others should feel free to do so. In this case, indefinite does not mean infinite, but you will need to convince either another checkuser that there was a mistake made, or the community that this sort of vandalism spree will not occur again. Courcelles 03:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why was checkuser used? Ginsuloft (talk) 04:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
It was used per policy to mitigate the harm done by the mass vandalism. Risker (talk) 05:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
I checked the page-move vandal account to find any sleeper socks that might continue the vandalism spree. I was greatly disappointed to find that it was   Confirmed as you. Accordingly, you are now blocked indefinitely for good-hand/bad-hand sock puppetry and vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unrelated-ish: why did you turn off the bot that removes blocked users from the AIV page? only (talk) 15:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! edit

 
Hello, Ginsuloft. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Sportsguy17 (TC) 16:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Firstly apologies if I am typing this in the wrong place. I received a message from you warning me about vandalizing wikipedia pages. I also noticed other warns and messages saying changes I made have been reversed. However I have never attempted to edit a wikipedia page. Please be more careful about accusing someone in future as on this occasion you have accused the wrong person. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.249.74 (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

What have you done. edit

  What have you done, I thought you could strive to be a successful ht tWikipedia editor, but all hopes have nonetheless......dashed away with the creation of Ultimate Cosmic Evil. Dreth 16:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm very disappointed, Ginsuloft. After your failed RfA, I was hoping that you could try again, but apparently not.   Epicgenius (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about edit

I've never edited any such page! Please explain this [1]. I am on a dynamic IP, FYI.117.194.199.204 (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I'm not sure if Ginsuloft will see this message, so I will try to answer. If you didn't make the edit, please ignore the message; it was posted last September for whoever was connected to that IP address at the time. There is more detail about this in the box at the bottom of User talk:117.194.199.204. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

OER inquiry edit

Hi Ginsuloft, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject! edit

 
Physiology gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

  • Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
  • Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
  • To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 13:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

please help translate this message into the local language
  The Cure Award
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Reply edit

i just post in talk page the other editing was not mine. 183.171.164.39 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

This user is indefinitely blocked. He cannot answer. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vandalism-only accounts edit

Category:Vandalism-only accounts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!!! edit

And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Village: Kasba Kotla Block: Pragpur District: Kangra State: Himachal Pradesh Country: India Continent: Asia Time Zone: IST ( UTC + 05:30) Currency: Indian Rupee ( INR ) Dialing Code: +91 or 01970 Language: Hindi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikas kotla (talkcontribs) 06:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply