Ghazanfarr

November 2017

Hello, I'm Theinstantmatrix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kamalia have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 14:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kamalia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 14:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. David.moreno72 14:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. David.moreno72 14:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ghazanfarr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will remove my promotional link of my profile but website is necessary for City. Thanks Ghazanfarr (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It is not a website it is a Wikipedia article and the fact that you may consider it essential is irrelevant! See WP:GNG. To be unblocked you will need to convince the reviewing admin that you are here to contribute to the wider encyclopaedia and not just to promote your city. Just Chilling (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.