Ggbvv

Don't do this

You don't remove WP: editing templates from the articles, just you did Lucknow Super Giants. It is a ex. Of disruptive editing. If want or your not agree with something in wp article, discusse about it a article talk page. Here Talk: Lucknow Super GiantsSuccess think (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Also, please don't re-add a tonne of empty tables or empty sections - it makes the article look like a joke. Just wait until there is something to add. When you do add, please note that tables require some text to place them context. Some of the tabular data would be best written as prose. Not all of it, but there is no need to have a table for everything. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Indian Premier League, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding that unnecessary table repeatedly. Retained players are already listed in List of 2022 Indian Premier League personnel changes, and we don't need to add Yoga Instructors of teams. Clog Wolf _Howl 13:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Ahmedabad Tigers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ahmedabad Tigers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including making unexplained removals of large amounts of article content and then reverting the removal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sunrisers Hyderabad in 2022

Hi. This is to mention that you are adding completely unnecessary information in the page and would be great if you could avoid this. You don't need to add all the information for the support staff including photographer. Hope this won't be repeated. Thanks. SaGa (talk) 06:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

RedBird Capital Partners moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, RedBird Capital Partners, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 04:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Prathmesh Mishra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Prathmesh Mishra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 04:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gerry Cardinale

Hello Ggbvv,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gerry Cardinale for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RedBird Capital Partners (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RedBird Capital Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RedBird Capital Partners, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ggbvv! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prathmesh Mishra (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prathmesh Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Prathmesh Mishra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmedabad Tigers 2 (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmedabad Tigers 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahmedabad Tigers 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 05:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Zimbabwe national cricket team. David Biddulph (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of 2023 Indian Premier League personnel changes

The article List of 2023 Indian Premier League personnel changes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOO SOON 2022 edition hadn't even started yet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spike 'em (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucknow Super Giants in 2023

The article Lucknow Super Giants in 2023 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON. No sources, & they still haven't played in 2022, never mind 2023.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Biddulph (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Indian Premier League

Hello, Welcome to edit Indian Premier League articles, But do not add or create new articles without any source Mr.Mani Raj Paul - talk 15:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vallabharebel per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vallabharebel. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Prathmesh Mishra

Hello, Ggbvv. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prathmesh Mishra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)